Should fsf-compat contain faces?
16 years, 1 month
Marcus Harnisch
Marcus Harnisch
Hi all
Still having annoying issues with CVS CEDET.
Functions in the code refer to faces that XEmacs doesn't know about
(e.g. region). Would it be a good idea to maintain a collection in
fsf-compat? What would be recommended: Creating a new face altogether?
Copying a similar XEmacs face (e.g. (copy-face 'zmacs-region 'region))
or making aliases by setting the `face-alias' property?
Regards
Marcus
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
- 2 participants
- 1 comments
Re: Mule (21.4/5) french ç and oe
16 years, 1 month
Julian Bradfield
Julian Bradfield
In mail.xemacs-beta, you wrote:
> But I am not sure, another idea would be to use
>
> "o--> [oe ligature]
Bad idea. Although French does not use odiaeresis, French writers may
well want it for borrowings from German. And it's completely
unintuitive.
I think it would be better to go with
oei -> oelig i
oeu -> oelig u
Then find a french wordlist with frequency data, and decide whether
oe anything else should be oelig or oe by default ;-)
I would say oe, since writing a word like coefficient with oelig
is absolutely wrong and hard to read, whereas writing a word like
coeliac with oe instead of oelig is not hard to read, although
officially incorrect.
You might then reverse Aidan's suggestion, and use
oee for oelig.
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
- 2 participants
- 1 comments
Re: is speed a concern?
16 years, 1 month
Raymond Toy
Raymond Toy
SL Baur wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Raymond Toy <raymond.toy(a)ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Julian Bradfield wrote:
>>> Do people find XEmacs noticeably slow in any normal usage pattern?
>>>
>> Yes, GNUS.
>
> Have you tracked this one down to a specific operation?
Basic operations seems reasonably fast. The slowest part is opening a
folder (group). Once I have the summary displayed, everything works
fine. But some of my mail folders are large, so I expect it to be slow
to generate the summary. However, some some newsgroups (comp.lang.lisp)
with only 25 (?) messages per day take a minute or more to open. I
don't know if this is because of the nntp server, but other newsgroups
with many more messages open fairly quickly. I don't know what makes
comp.lang.lisp so special.
I no longer remember the exact details of when this happened. It was
definitely an update to a new beta, but I probably also grabbed a new
sumo tarball, so it could have been an gnus update that caused the slowness.
Ray
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
Re: is speed a concern?
16 years, 1 month
Olivier Galibert
Olivier Galibert
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 12:15:56AM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > Saving and loading is horribly slow with text files in the tens or
> > hundreds of megabytes. That's under mule (I haven't used a non-mule
> > xemacs in years).
>
> (Greetings, OG!)
Hi Steve :-)
> Was this ever a reasonable speed?
Not that I know of. It always sucked. I *think* it sucked less with
non-mule, but I'm not entirely sure.
OG.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
What is with this error message?
16 years, 1 month
Wei Weng
Wei Weng
Hi All.
I just checked out xemacs 21.5 from CVS, and tried to build it, with
"./configure --with-mule --with-xim=yes --with-xft --with-menubars=gtk
--with-scrollbars=gtk; make"
I got the following error:
gui-x.o: In function `popup_selection_callback':
/home/wweng/Projects/xemacs-21.5/src/gui-x.c:310: undefined reference to
`x_focus_timestamp_really_sucks_fix_me_better'
menubar-x.o: In function `pre_activate_callback':
/home/wweng/Projects/xemacs-21.5/src/menubar-x.c:515: undefined reference to
`x_focus_timestamp_really_sucks_fix_me_better'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I thought at least CVS code should be build-able?
Thanks
Wei
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
- 3 participants
- 4 comments