May 2001 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Ben Wing

I've compiled a short list of bugs that I consider to be showstoppers for the 21.0 release. It's located at: http://devel.xemacs.org/xemacs/showstoppers.html Ben (typed by Martin)

6 participants
6 comments

Re: Commenting out code in lisp 5 years, 9 months

Adrian Aichner

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Krause <paulkrause1(a)mediaone.net> writes: Paul> Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes: >> >> Do we want to make C-u M-x comment-region smarter? >> Paul> No! Make indentation smarter. If a comment begins in column Paul> 1, don't Paul> indent it when reindenting a region. This solves the Paul> problem without Paul> style-changes or hacks to comment-region. >> Paul> Have I overlooked anything? >> >> This, maybe? >> >> (Info-goto-node "(xemacs)Comments") >> >> Adrian Paul> Could you be a little more specific? I don't what you're Paul> referring to. Maybe this? Paul> You can also use `Meta-;' to align an existing comment. If a line Paul> already contains the string that starts comments, `M-;' just moves Paul> point after it and re-indents it to the conventional place. Paul> Exception: Paul> comments starting in column 0 are not moved. Yes, that, and also the following paragraph. Some major modes have special rules for indenting certain kinds of comments in certain contexts. For example, in Lisp code, comments which start with two semicolons are indented as if they were lines of code, instead of at the comment column. Comments which start with three semicolons are supposed to start at the left margin. Emacs understands these conventions by indenting a double-semicolon comment using TAB and by not changing the indentation of a triple-semicolon comment at all. You have a valid point, though. single-; comments srarting in column 0 should not be moved and comment-region would work as advertised! You opened my eyes! To All: Isn't this what we should do? Martin? Stephen? Best regards, Adrian Paul> The trouble is, it doesn't work as documented. Here's a sample. Paul> ;;; header comment Paul> ;; This function is just an example. Paul> ;;; Here either two or three semicolons are appropriate. Paul> (defun foo (x) Paul> ;;; And now, the first part of the function: Paul> (lambda (foo bar) Paul> (if (foo bar) Paul> 'bif Paul> 'baz)) Paul> ;; The following line adds one. Paul> (1+ x)) ; This line adds one. Paul> ;; This function is just an example. Paul> ;;; Here either two or three semicolons are appropriate. Paul> (defun foo (x) Paul> ;;; And now, the first part of the function: Paul> ;; The following sexp is commented out using comment-region. Paul> ; (lambda (foo bar) Paul> ; (if (foo bar) Paul> ; 'bif Paul> ; 'baz)) Paul> ;; The following line adds one. Paul> (1+ x)) ; This line adds one. Paul> I get the same indentation using either M-; or C-M-q. Paul> Testing using xemacs -vanilla on Paul> XEmacs 21.2 (beta37) "Pan" (win32) of Sun Dec 03 2000 on PAULKRAUSE Paul> as well as Paul> XEmacs 21.0 "20 minutes to Nikko" (win32) of Fri Mar 26 1999 on Paul> BLACKBIRD Paul> (which I just happen to have lying around) -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/

4 participants
3 comments

pcl-cvs buglet 21 years, 5 months

Neal D. Becker

I marked a bunch of files in pcl-cvs mode. Then I chose "undo changes" from the menu. It prompts "Delete 8 files?". Rather misleading.

4 participants
13 comments

Help test EFS 21 years, 11 months

Michael Sperber

Steve Youngs has just released EFS package version 1.25. This is an experimental prerelease of EFS available as /ftp.xemacs.org:/pub/xemacs/beta/experimental/packages/efs-1.25-pkg.tar.gz In order to turn this into an official package release, I urgently need your help in testing it. I've tested EFS on a number of servers, but I only have access to Unix machines for client testing. So I especially need some reports from Windows users, connecting to both Unix and Windows ftp servers. This is especially as some subtle but possibly crucial aspects of the EFS<->client interactions have changed. I'm slowly working towards a testing suite, but it is not yet done and the urgency of the XEmacs/Cygwin situation has prompted me to try to release earlier. Let me emphasize that, if I cannot get some testing done by the community, the release will be significantly delayed, as we cannot risk putting out a faulty EFS to the general user community, given its current prominent role in the XEmacs package system. I appreciate your help. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

12 participants
29 comments

Re: Update to last message 21 years, 11 months

James LewisMoss

>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2001 10:04:21 -0700, Andy Piper <andyp(a)bea.com> said: Andy> At 12:54 PM 5/8/01 -0400, James LewisMoss wrote: >> >>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2001 08:56:19 -0700, Andy Piper >> >>>>> <andyp(a)bea.com> said: >> Andy> So I can't reproduce this on RH 7.0, so maybe there is Andy> something extra in your environment. I started XEmacs -vanilla Andy> and then brought up the file and switched on font-lock. Is Andy> there anything else I should do? >> >> Not sure. Maybe something else in the elisp stuff makes a >> difference (from two or three messages ago I'll resend if you >> like). Could it be a dark/light/auto background mode thing? >> Maybe the combination of faces I have? Maybe something broken on >> Debian. Andy> So can you reproduce it using vanilla? If not try building up Andy> your .emacs until it breaks. I couldn't. Adding just that code to -vanilla I could reproduce. Jim -- ＠James LewisMoss <dres(a)debian.org> | Blessed Be! ＠ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl! ＠"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

2 participants
2 comments

RE: Help test EFS 21 years, 12 months

Jerker Haglund

> I've been having trouble with this on a machine running the native > build of XEmacs (from the current CVS trunk) on Windows NT 4.0 using > the cygwin ftp client. When I try to open a file on an FTP server > (I've tried several and it doesn't seem to matter which server) the > file is truncated at a random location a few thousand bytes into the > file. If you look at the ftp log everything seems to be ok, but efs > doesn't seem to wait for the file to be transfered before using the > result. I've tried to debug this a bit, but haven't learned very > much. Has anyone else seen problems like this? I've noticed that EFS says 'Done' long before the result is visible. That's with an ADSL connection, native 21.4.3 on Win2k. If it doesn't wait properly, this could explain why the experimental EFS seems shaky, with both cygwin and windows ftp. Things fail 1st time, try again (when things are cached) and it works. /J. Haglund > > I'm connected via an ISDN line so ftp transfers are not too fast. > This might have something to do with it. I'll try it on other > machines with faster net connections and see if that affects things. > If I can provide any more information let me know.

5 participants
7 comments

Re: [PATCH] fix compile errors, C-g problems, etc. 22 years

Paul Stodghill

> NOTE: This patch has been committed. I've checked out the changes and recompiled. (while t) - C-g works - C-Sh-g works (let ((inhibit-quit t)) (while t)) - C-g doesn't works - C-Sh-g works as expected. Excellent! Two additional things: First, I've started noticing the dreaded "random lockups" since the change to set BROKEN_SIGIO. I will let you know if I continue to observe them with the most recent set of changes. Second, I had to make a few changes to get event-msw.c to compile under cygwin. I will post these to xemacs-patches separately.

3 participants
5 comments

Packqage Problem with 21.4.3 22 years

Jake Colman

I 've been installing my own (that is, not root) versions of XEmacs for quite some time. I configure with --prefix=$HOME and install it for personal use withput a hitch. I've just upgraded from 21.1.12 to 21.4.3 and have a problem with package updates. With 21.1.12, if I updated the packages list and/or packages, the update would be applied to the XEmacs distribution as whole, i.e., $PREFIX/lib/xemacs. When I do the same think with 21.4.3, it wants to apply the update to $~/.xemacs. This would only update my personal copy of XEmacs but not the installed copy. Since I've installed this copy personally, the end result won't matter except for: 1) Anyone that points to my XEmacs binary. They won't see those updates since they've not been applied to $PREFIX/lib/xemacs 2) How would my SA who installs this as root in /usr/local update the official installation and not root's private packages? Thanks! -- Jake Colman Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 946-0300 Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320 902 Plaza II Beeper: (800) 928-4640 Jersey City, NJ 07311 E-mail: colman(a)ppllc.com E-mail: jcolman(a)jnc.com web: http://www.ppllc.com

3 participants
5 comments

GTK+ and 21.2 22 years

Doug Alcorn

After seeing the "Call for Testers" for 21.2/22.0, I thought I would jump on the bandwagon. I'm primarily interested in the GTK+ port. So, I went out and grabbed the latest xemacs from cvs with: $ cvs -d :pserver:xemacs＠cvs.xemacs.org:/usr/CVSroot checkout -d xemacs-21.2 -r release-21-2 xemacs When I run ./configure, I don't see anything about enabling gtk+. Has the gtk+ port been merged in with 21.2 yet? Is it the default toolkit? How do I compile xemacs with GTK+ support? -- (__) Doug Alcorn (mailto:doug＠lathi.net http://www.lathi.net) oo / PGP 02B3 1E26 BCF2 9AAF 93F1 61D7 450C B264 3E63 D543 |_/ If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait.

4 participants
3 comments

Re: smtpmail.el fix for AUTH LOGIN (PR#1687) 22 years

Gunnar Evermann

Simon, could you look into this? Gunnar donpellegrino(a)computer.org writes: > Full_Name: Don Pellegrino > OS: Windows 2000 Pro > Version: 21.4 Solid Vapor > mule: no > severity: Aggravating > Submission from: (NULL) (151.197.120.90) > > > The current version of smtpmail.el in the mail-lib package > (mail-lib-1.37-pkg.tar.gz) only supports the SMTP AUTH mechanism "cram-md5". > There is code in the file to handle the SMTP AUTH "login" mechanism but due to > bug/typo the login mechanism is never used. Below are pasted the ediff of the > changes I made and the original file. AUTH LOGIN is now working fine for me. > On another note, perhaps there is an easier way to implemented all of the AUTH > SASL mechanisms by tying some sort of SASL package with the SMTP AUTH function? > Let me know if you need more info on this bug. > > *** C:\DOCUME~1\don\LOCALS~1\Temp\smtpmail.el Wed May 16 15:09:58 2001 > --- C:\DOCUME~1\don\LOCALS~1\Temp\smtpmail.elIUAeow Wed May 16 15:09:58 2001 > *************** > *** 185,191 **** > (defvar smtpmail-queue-index (concat smtpmail-queue-dir > smtpmail-queue-index-file)) > > ! (defconst smtpmail-auth-supported '(cram-md5) > "List of supported SMTP AUTH mechanisms.") > > ;;; > --- 185,191 ---- > (defvar smtpmail-queue-index (concat smtpmail-queue-dir > smtpmail-queue-index-file)) > > ! (defconst smtpmail-auth-supported '(cram-md5 login) > "List of supported SMTP AUTH mechanisms.") > > ;;; > *************** > *** 510,516 **** > (not (integerp (car response-code))) > (>= (car response-code) 400)) > (throw 'done nil))))) > ! ((member 'auth=login supported-extensions) > (smtpmail-send-command process "AUTH LOGIN") > (if (or (null (car (setq response-code (smtpmail-read-response > process)))) > (not (integerp (car response-code))) > --- 510,518 ---- > (not (integerp (car response-code))) > (>= (car response-code) 400)) > (throw 'done nil))))) > ! ( > ! ;(member 'auth=login supported-extensions) > ! (eq mech 'login) > (smtpmail-send-command process "AUTH LOGIN") > (if (or (null (car (setq response-code (smtpmail-read-response > process)))) > (not (integerp (car response-code))) >

3 participants
3 comments

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta May 2001