March 2000 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: EFS 1.19 prerelease checked into CVS 24 years

Andreas Jaeger

>>>>> Michael Sperber writes: > Subject pretty much says all. There aren't many changes since 1.18, > but Jan's `insert-file-contents' changes are in there as well as a > gross hack to support wu-ftpd 2.6.0 which is broken as usual. > Andreas: I'd like there to be a 1-2 week period before this gets > rolled into a new binary package. Ok, I try to remember it - but the period might be a bit longer. I'm trying to release this week a number of new packages and will omit efs. The next major update should come in a months time. The only problem which I do have is that I can't make a sumo tar ball since otherwise efs would be part of the sumo tar ball. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj(a)suse.de private aj(a)arthur.rhein-neckar.de

1 participants
0 comments

EFS 1.19 prerelease checked into CVS 24 years

Michael Sperber

Subject pretty much says all. There aren't many changes since 1.18, but Jan's `insert-file-contents' changes are in there as well as a gross hack to support wu-ftpd 2.6.0 which is broken as usual. Andreas: I'd like there to be a 1-2 week period before this gets rolled into a new binary package. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

1 participants
0 comments

Problem compiling packages from CVS 24 years

Robin S. Socha

[lart＠socha xemacs-packages] make all "Makefile", line 40: Need an operator "Makefile", line 42: Missing dependency operator "Makefile", line 44: Need an operator "Makefile", line 64: Missing dependency operator "Makefile", line 68: Need an operator "Makefile", line 69: Missing dependency operator "Makefile", line 73: Need an operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue FreeBSD socha.net 3.4-RELEASE, updated from CVS like described at cvs.xemacs.org last night. Anyone?

2 participants
2 comments

Re: [PATCH for 21.[12]] Re: Can't install packages produced on WindowsNT 24 years

Jan Vroonhof

Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes: > (with-temp-buffer > ;; What ever happened to i-f-c-literally > (let (file-name-handler-alist) > (insert-file-contents-internal full-package-filename)) > (if (not (string= (md5 (current-buffer)) > (package-get-info-prop this-package > 'md5sum))) > (error "Package %s does not match md5 checksum" base-filename))) > > Do you know how to interpret the i-f-c-literally comment? Yes. I wrote it. I would have sworn that at the time 21.0.bsomething my XEmacs did not have that function (but maybe I was confusing it with find-file-literally, which is indeed gone). > Will this work in an XEmacs without file-coding? Yes. > I will devise a patch for package-get.el and package-info.el to use > insert-file-contents-literally if nobody objects. Perfect. However it needs my patch to insert-file-contents-literally to actually work (currently i-f-c-l does not set the coding system!) Jan P.S. If all goes well I can actually apply patches from thursday or so. I am in the middle of moving.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Problem compiling packages from CVS 24 years

Adrian Aichner

>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.de> writes: Andreas> Strange - I'm using the same version of make without a Andreas> problem. The messages really look as if either make or Andreas> your Makefile is broken :-(. Maybe TABS in Robin's copy of the makefile got converted to spaces by accident? TAT Adrian

2 participants
1 comments

Re: Problem compiling packages from CVS 24 years

Andreas Jaeger

>>>>> Robin S Socha writes: Robin> Quoting Andreas Jaeger (aj(a)suse.de): >> >>>>> Robin S Socha writes: >> >> > [lart＠socha xemacs-packages] make all >> > "Makefile", line 40: Need an operator Robin> [...] >> Which make version? Robin> pkg_info | grep -i make Robin> gmake-3.78.1 GNU version of 'make' utility Strange - I'm using the same version of make without a problem. The messages really look as if either make or your Makefile is broken :-(. Sorry, no further ideas for now from my side, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj(a)suse.de private aj(a)arthur.rhein-neckar.de

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Problem compiling packages from CVS 24 years

Andreas Jaeger

>>>>> Robin S Socha writes: > [lart＠socha xemacs-packages] make all > "Makefile", line 40: Need an operator > "Makefile", line 42: Missing dependency operator > "Makefile", line 44: Need an operator > "Makefile", line 64: Missing dependency operator > "Makefile", line 68: Need an operator > "Makefile", line 69: Missing dependency operator > "Makefile", line 73: Need an operator > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > FreeBSD socha.net 3.4-RELEASE, updated from CVS like described at > cvs.xemacs.org last night. > Anyone? Which make version? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj(a)suse.de private aj(a)arthur.rhein-neckar.de

2 participants
1 comments

Re: [PATCH for 21.[12]] Re: Can't install packages produced on WindowsNT 24 years

Adrian Aichner

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: Jan> Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes: >> +;;; APA: Stolen from package-get in package-get.el >> +;;; Does this still lose under Mule? >> +;;; Will package-get lose too? Jan> Yes. Please use insert-file-contents-literally Hello Jan, package-get.el as of 21.2-b32+ currently has this: (with-temp-buffer ;; What ever happened to i-f-c-literally (let (file-name-handler-alist) (insert-file-contents-internal full-package-filename)) (if (not (string= (md5 (current-buffer)) (package-get-info-prop this-package 'md5sum))) (error "Package %s does not match md5 checksum" base-filename))) Do you know how to interpret the i-f-c-literally comment? Somebody obviously took it out. Was i-f-c-literally removed and brought back later? Will this work in an XEmacs without file-coding? I will devise a patch for package-get.el and package-info.el to use insert-file-contents-literally if nobody objects. Best regards, Adrian Jan> Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [PATCH for 21.[12]] Re: Can't install packages produced on WindowsNT 24 years

Jan Vroonhof

Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes: > +;;; APA: Stolen from package-get in package-get.el > +;;; Does this still lose under Mule? > +;;; Will package-get lose too? Yes. Please use insert-file-contents-literally Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [CRASH] steve's crash reappeared 24 years

Didier Verna

Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.org> wrote: > Well, at least it was intentional this time. I'm wondering actually whether > this check is correct. If you get an instantiation error then the assert > will fail, even though this may be a valid thing to happen. > > What happens if you simply #if 0 the ERROR_CHECK_GLYPHS part? Everything works fine again. Appart from `xemacs -nw' which still crashes, with the assertion in `string_instantiate' triggered. -- / / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/ - / / - / / /_/ / EPITA / LRDE mailto:didier＠epita.fr /_/ / /_/ / /__ / 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77 94276 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta March 2000