July 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: [patch] "config.values" belongs in --docdir 25 years, 5 months

Karl M. Hegbloom

>>>>> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes: APA> can you please send me a note in case you get this patch APA> approved? APA> I will have to make some adjustments for the Windows NT APA> native build then. Well, ok. Here's a note, even though you've already heard from Steven. :-) +- | O| <grin>

1 participants
0 comments

Tabs 'n widgets screenshot 25 years, 5 months

Andy Piper

... for anyone who's interested. andy -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Andy Piper Senior Consultant Architect, BEA Systems Ltd

4 participants
3 comments

Re: completions vs. space in dir name 25 years, 5 months

Neal D. Becker

Hmmm... Can't seem to reproduce it.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: completions vs. space in dir name 25 years, 5 months

Adrian Aichner

>>>>> "nbecker" == nbecker <nbecker(a)fred.net> writes: nbecker> It seems that completions won't work if a dir has a space nbecker> in the name. For which (emacs-version)? Works fine for me in "XEmacs 21.2 (beta18) \"Toshima\" [Lucid] (i586-pc-win32) of Thu Jul 15 1999 on ZJ75T" Completing with c:\prog SPACE SPACE mi SPACE SPACE leads c:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\ for me (shudder!). Adrian

2 participants
1 comments

Re: package standards version 1.1 25 years, 5 months

Michael Sperber

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: Jan> SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: >> If there's anything else that someone needs changed regarding info in >> the package-info.in files, now would be a good time to request it ... Jan> Well, weak and strong runtime dependencies would be nice. A mechanism Jan> to automatically determine the provides line (such that all modes are Jan> included etc) would nice. A conflicts entry would be cool too. Let's save this for the big overhaul---we don't have any code to *use* this information yet. All of these things are sensible, noted and on the list. -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

1 participants
0 comments

Re: tar-mode and crypt revisted [ patch included ] 25 years, 5 months

Jan Vroonhof

Darryl Okahata <darrylo(a)sr.hp.com> writes: > > * When tar-mode.el is loaded, it overrides the definition of > "normal-mode" with it's own definition: tar-normal-mode. Ouch. The best fix would probably to get rid of this. Overriding basic XEmacs functions is always bad. If there is some functionality missing built it into to XEmacs proper. Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Tabs 'n widgets screenshot 25 years, 5 months

Jan Vroonhof

Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes: > This is real cool, but looking at this, it's clear that it doesn't look the > way tab widgets are supposed to work. In particular, of course, they should > have the proper borders around the stuff displayed. I've attached a screen > shot of a typical Windows dialog box with a tab widget in it. The problem > lies with this "expanded gutter" concept. Tabs are *NOT* extra > graphical I think in this case the extra border would just be wasted space. The buffer tabs are more like the tabs used to select between various sheets in modern spreadsheets. They also do not use extra borders. Anyone remember the text base DOS IDE's that did MDI in text mode, wasting a character on every side of the text window, so that you actaully had a 50x10 window to edit in? Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: package standards version 1.1 25 years, 5 months

Jan Vroonhof

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > If there's anything else that someone needs changed regarding info in > the package-info.in files, now would be a good time to request it ... Well, weak and strong runtime dependencies would be nice. A mechanism to automatically determine the provides line (such that all modes are included etc) would nice. A conflicts entry would be cool too. Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: The plague is back: "Attempt to delete the sole visible or iconified frame" strikes again 25 years, 5 months

SL Baur

Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: ... > Cool. The next thing to figure out now is why Steve can duplicate > the problem even when allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame is t. I can't. What I cannot duplicate is Hrvoje's results with WindowMaker. Regardless of the value of `allow-deletion-of-last-visible-frame', I can C-x 5 0 a frame when another frame is open in another workspace, i.e. WindowMaker always does the Right Thing. I just retested with CDE and if I manually set the value to t, then everything works as expected. -- 泣き面に蜂 (When it rains, it pours)

2 participants
1 comments

EUDC 1.29 25 years, 5 months

Oscar Figueiredo

I just committed EUDC 1.29 to the CVS package tree. This release which is on the main trunk is also tagged as `r1-29' and as `current'. The NEWS file says: * Release 1.29 ------------ ** Support for non-textual values Right mouse button pops-up a contextual menu of functions to handle those values. Note: internal support for LDAP binary values in XEmacs 21.1 is corrupted *** Images can be displayed inline or as buttons (jpegPhoto LDAP attribute) *** Sound can be played (audio LDAP attribute) *** URLs are clickable (needs browse-url) ** Code has been splitted across several files to make loading faster ** Selecting an LDAP server with an empty search base asks for configuration ** You can import a batch of directory entries into BBDB in a single operation See `eudc-batch-export-records-to-bbdb' ** Miscellaneous bug fixes Oscar

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta July 1999