December 2003 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Discounted seminar places 20 years, 11 months

Robert Seviour

We are an international sales training company and we are taking bookings for our seminars in the New Year. (Discounts available for bookings paid before the 24th December) Send us a reply to this email and we will send you our information pack Best Regards Robert Seviour Tel 0044 (0)1481 720 294 Fax 0044 (0)1481 720 317 Email rob.seviour(a)virgin.net If sales training is not an issue for your company then please reply putting the word "Delete" in the subject box and we will remove you immediately.

1 participants
0 comments

HOT dates romance xxess women and YOU lkty 20 years, 11 months

Basil Youngblood

1 participants
0 comments

''You can improve your looks n rwuawl qdxz 20 years, 11 months

Corey Kennedy

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Build failure XEmacs 21.5.16 on Cygwin 20 years, 11 months

Rick Rankin

--- Martin Boeker <boeker(a)sun11.ukl.uni-freiburg.de> wrote: > Hello Rick, > > thank you. --pdump lets me build xemacs 21.5.16 without problems on Cygwin. > > I tried some different configuration options under Cygwin/WinXP and made > following observations: > > (1) --debug=no --error-checking=none --pdump --use-kkcc build fine but > resulted in a total crash of WinXP without bluescreen on loading files with > xemac (reproducible total crash). Starting xemacs and loading plain text > files worked fine, but in the moment I loaded an lisp or caml file the > machine crashed. > > (1b) So I thought it would be --pdump or --use-kkcc, but changing these > options resulted in OS-crash, too. > > (2) --debug=no --pdump --use-kkcc works fine, no errors; "stability" is > achieved by error-checking (I think you made it the default because of that). > > Perhaps --pdump should be made default for Cygwin? Martin, Please keep the discussions on the list. Yes, I think --pdump should be the default for Cygwin. Other than by submitting a patch, however, I have no control over the default configuration (or anything else, for that matter). Just an interested participant, like you. I'll try to submit a patch for this in the next few days. --Rick

1 participants
0 comments

XEmacs Packages have been pre-released (2003-12-09-07) 20 years, 11 months

Norbert Koch

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey there everyone. I have just added the following packages to the 'Pre-Releases' directory: New Packages in Pre-Release: =========================== prog-modes-1.92-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none psgml-1.42-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.3.1 sml-mode-0.11-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 3.9.5 x-symbol-1.09-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 4.5.1 Previously Announced Packages Still in Pre-Release: ================================================== auctex-1.36-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 11.13 cc-mode-1.42-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 5.30.8 ecb-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.11 erc-0.02-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: Version 4.0 Revision: 1.584 fsf-compat-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none gnus-1.75-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 5.10.2 hyperbole-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 4.18 mail-lib-1.64-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none mh-e-1.28-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 7.4.2 net-utils-1.35-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: N/A riece-1.13-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 0.1.5 text-modes-1.72-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none tramp-1.17-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.0.35 x-symbol-1.08-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 4.5.1 xemacs-base-1.83-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none Detailed Changes: ================ - ------- ChangeLog Entries from xemacs-packages/prog-modes/ChangeLog ------- 2003-12-09 Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> * Makefile (VERSION): XEmacs package 1.92 released. 2003-12-08 Ville Skyttä <scop(a)xemacs.org> * php-mode.el (php-mode): Make autoload hack autoload-only, add interactive flag. - ------- ChangeLog Entries from xemacs-packages/psgml/ChangeLog ------- 2003-12-09 Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> * Makefile (VERSION): XEmacs package 1.42 released. 2003-12-08 Ville Skyttä <scop(a)xemacs.org> * psgml.el (xml-mode): Make autoload hack autoload-only, add interactive flag. - ------- ChangeLog Entries from xemacs-packages/sml-mode/ChangeLog ------- 2003-12-09 Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> * Makefile (VERSION): XEmacs package 0.11 released. 2003-12-08 Ville Skyttä <scop(a)xemacs.org> * sml-mode.el (sml-mode): Make autoload hack autoload-only, add interactive flag. - ------- ChangeLog Entries from xemacs-packages/x-symbol/ChangeLog ------- 2003-12-09 Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org> * Makefile (VERSION): XEmacs package 1.09 released. 2003-12-09 Steve Youngs <sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au> * man/x-symbol.texi: Update to latest edition. Installing These: ================ Manually: - -------- 1) Download the packages that you want to install from: /ftp.xemacs.org:/pub/xemacs/beta/experimental/packages/ 2) Unpack them to: [1] /usr/local/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages/ 3) Re-start XEmacs. Using XEmacs Package Tools (XEmacs 21.[245].x): - ---------------------------------------------- 1) Tools -> Packages -> Add Download Site -> Pre-Releases 2) Tools -> Packages -> List and Install 3) Select the packages you wish to install (there are brief instructions at the bottom of the packages buffer). 4) Packages -> Install/Remove Selected 5) Re-start XEmacs. Using XEmacs Package Tools (XEmacs 21.1.14): - ------------------------------------------- 1) Options -> Manage Packages -> Add Download Site -> Pre-Releases 2) Options -> Manage Packages -> List and Install 3 - 5) As per XEmacs 21.[245].x. norbert - XEmacs Package Release Manager. Footnotes: [1] Note: Mule packages should be installed into: /usr/local/lib/xemacs/mule-packages/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/1X5Ygu3ywdHdhM0RAtPgAKDgjl/076TD7HFkNpaGGRvIRdoMvQCeJR9w H7287ow1YwXmBQy9eU5TJJ4= =Ez6W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 participants
1 comments

Account Info 20 years, 11 months

carlo-bachmann＠lightspeedcredit.com

The Hottest Lesbian Movies All at Mega-sixtynine for Just $1 Visit our site below: http://www.regalwebhost.com/open/?m69:99366:K no more of these http://www.regalwebhost.com/open/?us

1 participants
0 comments

RE: When display-buffer has been changed to four args? 20 years, 11 months

Berndl, Klaus

Here is the patch for window-xemacs.el against XEmacs 21.4.13: --- window-xemacs.el 2003-12-09 11:05:17.000000000 +0100 +++ window-xemacs.el.patched 2003-12-09 11:03:35.000000000 +0100 ＠＠ -385,7 +385,7 ＠＠ ;; and does `returns' all over the place and there's no sense ;; in trying to rewrite it to be more Lispy. (catch 'done - (let (window old-frame target-frame explicit-frame) + (let (window old-frame target-frame explicit-frame shrink-it) (setq old-frame (or (last-nonminibuf-frame) (selected-frame))) (setq buffer (get-buffer buffer)) (check-argument-type 'bufferp buffer) ＠＠ -622,8 +622,11 ＠＠ 2) (window-height upper)) nil upper)) - (if shrink-to-fit - (shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer window))))) + ;; Klaus Berndl <klaus.berndl(a)sdm.de>: Only in + ;; this situation we shrink-to-fit but we can do + ;; this first after we have displayed buffer in + ;; window (s.b. (set-window-buffer window buffer)) + (setq shrink-it shrink-to-fit)))) (setq window (get-lru-window target-frame))) ＠＠ -636,7 +639,13 ＠＠ (set-window-buffer window buffer) - (display-buffer-1 window))))) + ;; Now window's previous buffer has been brought to the top + ;; of the MRU chain and window displays buffer - now we can + ;; shrink-to-fit if necessary + (if shrink-it + (shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer window)) + + (display-buffer-1 window))))) (or (equal wconfig (current-window-configuration)) (push-window-configuration wconfig)) result)) Ciao, Klaus -----Original Message----- From: Vin Shelton [mailto:acs＠xemacs.org] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 2:46 AM To: Adrian Aichner Cc: Berndl, Klaus; 'xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org ' Subject: Re: When display-buffer has been changed to four args? Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes: >>>>>> "Klaus" == Klaus Berndl <Berndl> writes: > > Klaus> Hi, > > Klaus> can anybody tell me, when display-buffer gots its forth > Klaus> argument SHRINK-TO-FIT (same for get-frame-for-buffer)? > > Klaus> In 21.4.6 get-frame-for-buffer does not accept these 4 > Klaus> arguments - so i assume display-buffer doesn't too. In my > Klaus> 21.4.13 version display-buffer and get-frame-for-buffer > Klaus> accept this SHRINK-TO-FIT argument. > > Hi Klaus, I commited your SHRINK-TO-FIT fix to 21.5 and recommended it > for 21.4. > > See > http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-cvs/200309/msg00050.html > > The display-buffer SHRINK-TO-FIT argument has been there for a long > time. > > cvs annotate will tell you for how long. > > Hope this helps, > > Adrian > > Klaus> So my question: In which version of XEmacs 21.4 this has > Klaus> been changed? Or which version of window-xemacs.el is the > Klaus> last one which contains display-buffer *without* the > Klaus> SHRINK-TO-FIT-argument. Same for frame.el (which contains > Klaus> get-frame-for-buffer) Klaus, If there's a bug in shrink-to-fit for the 21.4 implementation of display-buffer, I would happily accept a patch for 21.4. The patch you submitted in September, 2003 does not apply cleanly. Thanks, Vin

1 participants
0 comments

Show her the REAL you!! rjxnfmphjqgqwplf 20 years, 11 months

Ava Boston

1 participants
0 comments

Re: gnus-util.el loads rmail 20 years, 11 months

Steve Youngs

|--==> "KY" == Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka(a)jpl.org> writes: KY> Loading of rmail is only for the `rmail-select-summary' macro, KY> isn't it? If so, it can be solved by not compiling that section: KY> --- gnus-util.el~ 2003-12-03 23:28:53 +0000 KY> +++ gnus-util.el 2003-12-05 00:44:47 +0000 KY> ＠＠ -864,8 +864,9 ＠＠ KY> (narrow-to-region (point) (point-max)) KY> (rmail-count-new-messages t) KY> (when (rmail-summary-exists) KY> - (rmail-select-summary KY> - (rmail-update-summary))) KY> + (dont-compile KY> + (rmail-select-summary KY> + (rmail-update-summary)))) KY> (rmail-count-new-messages t) KY> (rmail-show-message msg)) KY> (save-buffer))))) KY> How about it? So this would be as a replacement to Jerry's patch or in addition to it? And the doc string from `dont-compile' troubles me a little... ,----[ C-h f dont-compile RET ] | `dont-compile' is a compiled Lisp macro | -- loaded from "/usr/local/lib/xemacs-21.4.14/lisp/bytecomp-runtime.elc" | (dont-compile &rest BODY) | | Documentation: | Like `progn', but the body always runs interpreted (not compiled). | If you think you need this, you're probably making a mistake somewhere. `---- ...that last line in particular. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---| | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. | | The proof of the pudding, is under the crust. | |------------------------------<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au>---|

3 participants
7 comments

Impress the daylights out of her! meibqpwsout 20 years, 11 months

Ava Boston

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta December 2003