January 2018 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Including "vc-fossil.el" in vc? 4 years, 1 month

Hauke Fath

Hi, I nave been banging a bit on vc-fossil.el from <http://chiselapp.com/user/venks/repository/emacs-fossil/doc/tip/doc/index...>, and got it to work with Xemacses "slightly-older vc. Provided there is interest: What would be the procedure to include the fuke with the XEmacs vc? Cheerio, hauke -- The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath () No HTML/RTF in email Institut für Nachrichtentechnik /\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-21344

2 participants
4 comments

is speed a concern? 4 years, 4 months

Julian Bradfield

Another possibly silly question arising from perusal of the great Mule merge... Is speed (or small linear factors in memory) ever actually a concern nowadays? The whole deal of supporting multiple internal buffer formats seems to be justified by speed for multi-lingual processing, and there are various tricky things scattered around the rest of the code to improve speed. The last time I can remember being disturbed by XEmacs' slowness was sometime in the mid 90s when I was running Lucid Emacs 19 on a 68040. (The days when a full compile was a go-out-for-long-dinner job rather than a you-may-just-have-time-to-make-coffee job.) On the other hand, I don't do extensive non-English processing. Do people find XEmacs noticeably slow in any normal usage pattern? -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

6 participants
9 comments

Xft dpi font scaling 5 years, 3 months

René Rebe

Hi there, since years I use xemacs-beta, currently 21.5.34: https://t2sde.org/packages/xemacs-beta Except the lack of updates I am quite happy with that setup, however one details drives me increasingly crazy. Namely HiDPI font scaling when I switch between old displays and newer, 4k+ HiDPI, 192++ dpi screens. I have this font selection in my .xemacs/init.el (set-face-font 'default "Source Code Pro-13") ; or -22 for HiDPI Ideally I want this -13 to be pt, so that I do not have to edit the file each time I switch my desk or continue coding on the road. Googling around suggest others alternative forms which either do not work in xemacs-beta, or do not prove the situation. I tried to read the lisp files, but could not find anything that would help me there either. Is there anything "pt" like so that a 13pt would result in say 13 pixels on a low resolution display, and 26 (or whatever) pixels on a HiDPI screen with the X server dpi set accordingly? PS: Surprisingly the Xemacs menus and such sale automatically, just not this most important, main edit buffer, ..? Best regards – and greetings from Europe, René -- René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10117 Berlin http://exactcode.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de

3 participants
11 comments

Summary of XEmacs Issue Tracking System Issues 5 years, 3 months

XEmacs Issue Tracking System

ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2018-01-23 - 2018-01-30) XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue number. Do NOT respond to this message. 574 open ( +0) / 323 closed ( +0) / 897 total ( +0) Open issues with patches: 13 Average duration of open issues: 3034 days. Median duration of open issues: 3245 days. Open Issues Breakdown new 266 ( +0) deferred 6 ( +0) napping 3 ( +0) verified 57 ( +0) assigned 145 ( +0) committed 19 ( +0) documented 3 ( +0) done/needs work 15 ( +0)

1 participants
0 comments

Mule enabled Xemacs for windows 5 years, 4 months

Uwe Brauer

Hi Is there any pre-compiled-easy-to-install Xemacs (21.4.X) with mule enabled? I only know about Mule disabled ones. Thanks Uwe Brauer

2 participants
4 comments

Summary of XEmacs Issue Tracking System Issues 5 years, 4 months

XEmacs Issue Tracking System

ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2018-01-16 - 2018-01-23) XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue number. Do NOT respond to this message. 574 open ( +0) / 323 closed ( +0) / 897 total ( +0) Open issues with patches: 13 Average duration of open issues: 3027 days. Median duration of open issues: 3238 days. Open Issues Breakdown new 266 ( +0) deferred 6 ( +0) napping 3 ( +0) verified 57 ( +0) assigned 145 ( +0) committed 19 ( +0) documented 3 ( +0) done/needs work 15 ( +0)

1 participants
0 comments

GTK XEmacs vs GTK bug 85715? 5 years, 4 months

Evgeny Roubinchtein

Dear XEmacs users and developres, The message I am citing below piqued my interest: does the GTK version of XEmacs not suffer from the infamous GTK bug 85715 ( https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85715) which affects, e.g., GNU Emacs? Or does the GTK version of XEmacs presently suffer from too many bugs to worry about that one bug? :P Ar an naoiú lá de mí na Nollaig, scríobh René Rebe: ... <https://list-archive.xemacs.org/archive/list/xemacs-beta＠xemacs.org/threa...> The current development GTK code is here: https://bitbucket.org/jsparkes/xemacs-gtk Which is, thankfully, a bit more recent. I plan to merge this into the trunk soon. It’s not as polished as even the Xft code, but has more potential in the longer term, as it includes Pango support for various scripts that we would otherwise have to provide ourselves. -- Best, Evgeny

2 participants
1 comments

Summary of XEmacs Issue Tracking System Issues 5 years, 4 months

XEmacs Issue Tracking System

ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2018-01-09 - 2018-01-16) XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue number. Do NOT respond to this message. 574 open ( +0) / 323 closed ( +0) / 897 total ( +0) Open issues with patches: 13 Average duration of open issues: 3020 days. Median duration of open issues: 3231 days. Open Issues Breakdown new 266 ( +0) deferred 6 ( +0) napping 3 ( +0) verified 57 ( +0) assigned 145 ( +0) committed 19 ( +0) documented 3 ( +0) done/needs work 15 ( +0)

1 participants
0 comments

Summary of XEmacs Issue Tracking System Issues 5 years, 4 months

XEmacs Issue Tracking System

ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2018-01-02 - 2018-01-09) XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue number. Do NOT respond to this message. 574 open ( +0) / 323 closed ( +0) / 897 total ( +0) Open issues with patches: 13 Average duration of open issues: 3013 days. Median duration of open issues: 3224 days. Open Issues Breakdown new 266 ( +0) deferred 6 ( +0) napping 3 ( +0) verified 57 ( +0) assigned 145 ( +0) committed 19 ( +0) documented 3 ( +0) done/needs work 15 ( +0)

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Some XEmacs notes 5 years, 4 months

Jerry James

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, I'm out of time tonight, but in the next couple of days I will > sync up to mercurial head and try again. If it still doesn't work, > I'll provide details. The gtk2 and gtk3 builds both work fine. The failure I saw is in the glade code. I got rid of the -I directive pointing to the glade header files and all is fine now. I presume the glade code only works with gtk+, then. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

1 participants
0 comments

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta January 2018