RE: Missing dependency in Makefile

Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; wrote: I think this is a little too strict: given that parallel makes don't work at all at present, any improvement would be worthwhile. The important thing is not to break the existing build. So a patch which makes say 50% of build orderings work rather than say 30% at present (figures plucked from the air) would be worth applying. I may send such patches - next time I build xemacs and get a failure due to a missing dependency I will add it. -- Ed Avis <avised(a)kbcfp.com&gt;