Re: -hook or -functions?
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> wrote:
if you have a hook that takes arguments or otherwise departs from
being a "normal hook", FSF says you should call it -functions, not
-hook. unfortunately, many existing FSF hooks don't follow this [e.g.
they use -hooks instead]. furthermore, xemacs convention in this
regard is just -hook.
if i'm creating new such hooks, what do people think i should use?
As an end-user of the Lisp, '-functions' makes sense to me. They are
different from '-hook' things, and I like that to be obvious.
Daniel
--
If you do what you should not, you must bear what you would not.
-- Ben Franklin