Re: [PATCH] Portable dumper fixes for NT
"Kirill 'Big K' Katsnelson" <kkm(a)dtmx.com> writes:
> > PDUMP is incompatible with USE_UNION_TYPE, right?
>
>It shouldn't, actually.
So that the union type is becoming obsolete?
I think what Olivier tried to say is: TPD shouldn't be *incompatible*
with USE_UNION_TYPE, i.e. the new dumper is supposed to work fine with
the union type.
Olivier, correct me if I've misunderstood you.