* Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer(a)xemacs.org>:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> 7. hg commit. (This should update the subrepos, see below.) I think
> you should be able to check with "hg diff -S" in the top directory.
> 8. Tag (I don't think we do this now, but I wonder if it's not a good
> 9. Make new packages and upload them. Announce availability.
There should be another push to bitbucket somewhere in there, I think.
After step 8?
That's right, an interesting point.
Should I push the local changes in the subrepo (e.g. ruby-modes like I
just did) or should I push all my changes from the top-level?
After my push in ruby-modes, on the top-level I get
% hg status --added --modified --subrepos
I can discard the changes in the subrepo and try to merge/push, but that
doesn't sound correct.
Another question arises. You said I should not update on top-level, but
sometimes people check in changes in this directory. How do I get
these? Or should I get patches and submit them myself?
BTW, would it be easier - for now - to get the repository in state, to
get a new clone?
XEmacs-Beta mailing list