Re: Package documentation and skeleton.el
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
The *.rules files definitely need to have all the comments moved to
texi, to be replaced with a reference to the info/html docs and terse
memory-jogger comments.
Seconded. In texi files we can extend the documentation if we want to
and don't hinder the impatient ;-)
In other news, I've written a couple of skeleton definitions to
create
Makefile, package-info.in, and .el files. I think the skeleton syntax
really sucks, and am leaning toward rewriting from scratch, but I'll
check these in within a couple of days for people to look at. What do
other people think?
This sounds great. I'm not sure I can be of much help but I
definitely like to have a look at it.
norbert.