Ville Skyttä writes:
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Ok, I'll take your word for it. If it was vc.el or vc-hooks.el,
suppose it would be a different story as GPLv3+ would AFAIU cascade
into all other packages in our packages tree that use vc for
I meant the whole vc package. I guess a good first try would be to
grep package REQUIRES for vc, and see what we have to upgrade.
But at this point I think we just have to go ahead and relicense the
whole shebang. We should go back to Mats Lidell's grep he did in the
summer and see if there are any files that don't carry "or later", and
then think about how we want to deal with the possibility that there
are files that were forcibly relicenced to "or later" without the
I hate copyleft. Never liked it in principle, now it's a major PITA.
XEmacs-Beta mailing list