Re: patch: minor fix for ABBREV-HACKING-NEXT-LINE
greg(a)itasoftware.com (Greg Klanderman) writes:
--- mail-abbrevs.el.bak Wed Dec 3 20:43:47 2003
+++ mail-abbrevs.el Wed Dec 3 20:44:12 2003
＠＠ -607,7 +607,8 ＠＠
(if (and (looking-at "[ \t]*\n")
(= (char-syntax (preceding-char)) ?w))
(expand-abbrev))
- (next-line (or arg 1)))
+ (next-line (or arg 1))
+ (setq this-command 'next-line))
Looks good to me. Maybe we should add a short comment, so that
someone who looks at the code later doesn't wonder, "what the hell is
this here for?" Something like
;; because line-move checks last-command
would be more than enough.