"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Rodney Sparapani writes:
> On 02/14/11 01:15 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> > I don't think you did anything wrong. 5dd1ba5e0113 is in
> > http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs
, but not
> > http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs-beta
. (Pushes are done to the
> > "xemacs" repo, then given a little soak time before being made
> > from the "xemacs-beta" repo.)
AFAIK, xemacs-beta is no longer being updated, because it turned out
that xemacs only very rarely stayed unbuildable across an xemacs-beta
update boundary. VCSes don't provide a way to say that, though.
No, I still update it once a week, after checking that it builds. But
you're right, it's very rare that I hold up the push.
I know you've said it many times before, but do we have a release plan?
My favorite would be to merge over the GPLv3 stuff (not your favorite, I
know), clone the repo to "xemacs-stable", and start release engineering
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
XEmacs-Beta mailing list