Re: Other packaging issues I've been slapped in the face with

sb> Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de&gt; writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: >>sb> 1. My decision to base primary package searching off of $prefix appears sb> to be have a suboptimal one, but probably too late to fix for 21.0. sb> I'm not sure I fully like the package-path hard-coding from $prefix. sb> It makes it somewhat difficult to transport binaries. Fortunately the sb> relative path searching appears quite adequate. Now, we went around and around with this issue in the original discussion, and you finally convinced me it was necessary. Too bad :-) You could easily avoid hard-coding $prefix into the binary kit if you only propagated it to src/paths.h. This is a trivial change but, IMHO, too late for 21.0, and not terribly important. I'll submit a patch for 21.1. -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla