Re: point-at-{eol,bol}
karlheg(a)inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
Lars> Yes. But I think these names are better names than the
ones
Lars> I originally came up with -- point-at-{eol,bol}.
Hmmm. It works well with completion and apropos though, to name them
using `point-at-.*'. If I'm looking for functions that do things
with "point", that's what I'd grep for.
There is some presedence for the new names -- extent-start-position,
extent-end-position, marker-position, etc. -- and having abbreviations
in functions is something, I think, that should be avoided if
practical (and there are no historical reasons why it's neat having
them).
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi(a)ifi.uio.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen