On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:36:39 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
Sean MacLennan writes:
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:23:50 +0900
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> > Anybody with feelings about this, please let us know!
> If with-mule becomes the default, will the xemacs-mule-sumo be
> rolled into the xemacs-sumo? It seems to me that if with-mule is
> the default, the "default" sumo should just work.
I'll have to think about it. For the packages the main issue is that
it's just deadweight, I think, although there *may* be some packages
that conditionally require Mule packages if they're available (rather
than when (featurep 'mule)). That would be *bad* as Alan discovered.
> Not sure how that would affect us without-mule users.
Shouldn't affect you at all. You'll just have some deadweight files
Cool. I if I get some time.... I may just try installing the mule sumo
just for giggles.
I take it then there are no byte compile issues with mule versus
XEmacs-Beta mailing list