Mike Kupfer writes:
> Though come to think of it, I guess we're already facing
> possibility because of the GPLv3 issue.
Maybe. If I remember correctly though there was an opening that would allow
individual packages to be upgraded to GPLv3. I think Stephen wanted to
consult a lawyer on the issue first though before we could go along wih that.
Do I remember correctly Stephen? Any news on that?
> So I'm okay with reverting the troublesome packages for now.
> that's easy for me to say since none of my packages would be reverted.
> (And I'm not on the Review Board.) ;-)
No I'd rather go with the fix and go forward approach.
XEmacs-Beta mailing list