* "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org>:
That's correct. It is not obvious to me that recursive commit
desirable unless Norbert *never* makes local changes of his own in
packages in that tree, only changes related to releases and build
infrastructure. The point is that he needs to pull in the package
repo anyway, and he needs to do the ChangeLog and Makefile updates
there, so he may as well commit there too. Then back up to the top
level, make any needed changes there, commit, and push.
Hmm, how should I commit the Makefile and ChangeLog changes I make to
the packages? Right now after I've uploaded the new set I get
nk＠vserv:test% hg st -qS
because these changes have been committed locally.
I can revert them and commit/push from the top level. Would this then
be correct? Or do I have to push the changes individually (but what'll
happen to my top level repo then)?
Heck, I'll never understand it :-)
XEmacs-Beta mailing list