dvorak worth the effort? (was: dvorak mule)
> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Uwe Brauer writes:
> I just looked, mule does not contain dvorak as an input method or do I
> miss something? GNU emacs 23, seem also not.
grep finds mule-packages/leim/quail/latin-post.el:
;; Dvorak (dvorak)
"english-dvorak" "English" "DV＠" t
"English (ASCII) input method simulating Dvorak keyboard"
Oops I tried out grep in the mule directory. And apropos.
Ok and it is called via english-dvorak!
I would recommend avoiding this except when you're stuck on
somebody
else's machine, though. There are surely console keyboard configs for
this.
Yes of course. Now since some of the list members are long time (Xemacs)
users I would like to hear their experience: when I have a lot to type
and pain starts, the switch to dvorak comes into my mind. However that
would mean,
- to undo and redo neuronal structures which are almost hard wired
into my brain (touch typing)
- getting stacked when using somebody else machine.
So did anybody actually tried dvorak out successfully?
Uwe Brauer
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta