Re: [xemacs-psgml 1.0.1 PATCH] Removing req. for ISO_8879:1986
>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
sb> Well done, Adrian! Thanks!
sb> Jareth, we have to perform some CVS magic to make this patch work.
sb> The directory oa/psgml/etc/ISO_8879:1986/ needs to be renamed to
sb> oa/psgml/etc/ISO_8879=1986/ as in the XEmacs core CVS tree. IIRC,
Hello Steven, and thanks!
Oops, my patch is designed to transliterate ?: to ?- as this would
seem well in line with http://www.sil.org/sgml/sotr9401-a2.html (look
for hyphen in the text).
Is there a reason why we would want ISO_8879=1986 instead of
ISO_8879-1986?
sb> some of the files in CVS/ have to be changed as well. I'm going to
sb> make this change in my tree. Please let me know when it is safe to
sb> attempt a CVS commit.
sb> Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes:
> Hello All,
> Here's my shot at it. See my recent mail to xemacs-beta and xemacs-nt:
>> Subject: Two xemacs-psgml issues (ISO_8879:1986,
"sgml")
>> Date: 04 Jul 1998 14:51:08 +0200
>> Message-ID: <rxs7m1t7pab.fsf_-_(a)tomorrow.ecf.teradyne.com>
> This patch makes it possible to rename etc/psgml/ISO_8879:1986
to
> etc/psgml/ISO_8879-1986, which is legal on Windows NT and 95.
sb> ...
> -(defvar sgml-public-transliterations '((? . ?_) (?/ . ?%))
> +(defvar sgml-public-transliterations '((? . ?_) (?/ . ?%) (?: . ?-))
sb> You mean (?: . ?=), right? This directory was renamed with an equals
No.
sb> sign in the XEmacs core Attic.
Was this done before my patch? Can we still use ?- instead of ?= ?
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Aichner
Applications Engineer
Teradyne GmbH
Semiconductor Test Group Telephone +49/89/41861(0)-208
Dingolfinger Strasse 2 Fax +49/89/41861-217
D-81673 MUENCHEN E-mail aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com