On 2/17/2011 6:40 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Michael Sperber writes:
> I'd then suggest moving towards a model more in line what many other
> projects have concluded is a good strategy for producing releases:
I'm sorry, Mike, but the mere word "release" does not excite me.
"Producing releases" really sounds like pointless work to me.
I have to agree with Stephen. The release model you've proposed works great if
you have sufficient developers which I do not believe is the case here. Instead,
I would recommend a "pick three most important items, develop, make stable and
Mark stability point in version control" approach. This approach has the lowest
overhead and minimizes time between with the stable code.
XEmacs-Beta mailing list