December 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: Merging customize support 24 years, 4 months

Jan Vroonhof

wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > So to make a face in Emacs 21 now, you do: > > (make-face 'foo) > (set-face-attribute 'foo nil > :family "lucidatypewriter" > :width 'normal > :height 200 > :weight 'normal > :foreground "red" > :background "pink" > :strike-through t) What happens if the attribute list is incomplete? Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: update packages screws gdb-mode 24 years, 4 months

Gunnar Evermann

Raymond Toy <toy(a)rtp.ericsson.se> writes: > Jan> Do you have the Sun package installed? > > Yes. Does that matter? I don't use the Sun sparcworks/XEmacs > debugger integration. (Users here report that it eventually crashes > xemacs.) Strange, I don´t use the gdb mode but the Sun workshop stuff all the time and don´t have any problems. Could you convince your users to submit a real bug report, please? Gunnar

1 participants
0 comments

Re: update packages screws gdb-mode 24 years, 4 months

Jan Vroonhof

nbecker(a)fred.net writes: > Sun 1.12 1.12 Support for Sparcworks. > > Yes I have this package. I'm not sure, but I suspect I have always > had it before I saw the problem with gdb. Should I remove it? No. > Clearly, something changed with xemacs gdb package. I'm still using > the same underlying OS and gdb-4.18 as before. This very weird. Nothing has been changed in gdb.el as far as I can see. Can you see this also directly from "xemacs -vanilla"? Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: update packages screws gdb-mode 24 years, 4 months

Neal D. Becker

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: Jan> nbecker(a)fred.net writes: >> I guess I didn't explain it well. Why not try it yourself? Jan> I did. It works for me. >> have used M-x gdb. I know it's a somewhat raw interface - but now >> it's a lot rawer. And kindof broken. Two things in particular: Jan> It think you get hit by gdb not initializing correctly because of some error. Jan> Do you have the Sun package installed? >> >> I'm running on Linux. I *may* have downloaded the package for sun - I >> don't think I am using it. Jan> Could you please check? gdb.el has incestuous relation with eos from Jan> the Sun package. Sun 1.12 1.12 Support for Sparcworks. Yes I have this package. I'm not sure, but I suspect I have always had it before I saw the problem with gdb. Should I remove it? Clearly, something changed with xemacs gdb package. I'm still using the same underlying OS and gdb-4.18 as before.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: update packages screws gdb-mode 24 years, 4 months

Raymond Toy

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: Jan> nbecker(a)fred.net writes: >> >> Instead of talking to gdb for me, it's acting as if I'm using raw gdb >> >> with just a terminal interface. It didn't display the source (at >> >> least, not at this point in the interaction), but it's asking me to >> >> hit return or quit. Is M-x gdb hosed, or do I need to set some >> >> variables to get reasonable behaviour? >> Jan> Are you sure you didn't want to type M-x gdbsrc ? >> >> I'm sure the behaviour of M-x gdb has changed, and it's not an >> improvement. Jan> What you are describing (i.e. raw gdb with a terminal interface) is Jan> almost exactly what M-x gdb does. The displaying the source part is Jan> part of M-x gdbsrc. Apparently for you gdbsrc sort of replaces M-x gdb Jan> (or at least used to). Does it still work if you do M-x gdbsrc. If not Jan> something else is broken. I have not tried the latest gdb package, but for as long as I've been using gdb, M-x gdb always displayed the source, just as Neal says. I've never used gdbsrc (explicitly, anyway) and didn't know of its existence until now. Jan> Do you have the Sun package installed? Yes. Does that matter? I don't use the Sun sparcworks/XEmacs debugger integration. (Users here report that it eventually crashes xemacs.) Ray

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Modules (was: Re: How about a feature freeze) 24 years, 4 months

William M. Perry

Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk> writes: > Jan Vroonhof wrote: > > > I think we should push Glynn Clements[1] to release his patches that > > make XEmacs have the right signal behavior for init and allows it to > > reap processes. > > > Footnotes: > > [1] I think it was him. > > I don't. Oh yeah? And who do you expect us to believe. :) -bp

1 participants
0 comments

Re: update packages screws gdb-mode 24 years, 4 months

Jan Vroonhof

nbecker(a)fred.net writes: > I guess I didn't explain it well. Why not try it yourself? I did. It works for me. > have used M-x gdb. I know it's a somewhat raw interface - but now > it's a lot rawer. And kindof broken. Two things in particular: It think you get hit by gdb not initializing correctly because of some error. > Jan> Do you have the Sun package installed? > > I'm running on Linux. I *may* have downloaded the package for sun - I > don't think I am using it. Could you please check? gdb.el has incestuous relation with eos from the Sun package. Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: update packages screws gdb-mode 24 years, 4 months

Neal D. Becker

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: Jan> nbecker(a)fred.net writes: >> >> Instead of talking to gdb for me, it's acting as if I'm using raw gdb >> >> with just a terminal interface. It didn't display the source (at >> >> least, not at this point in the interaction), but it's asking me to >> >> hit return or quit. Is M-x gdb hosed, or do I need to set some >> >> variables to get reasonable behaviour? >> Jan> Are you sure you didn't want to type M-x gdbsrc ? >> >> I'm sure the behaviour of M-x gdb has changed, and it's not an >> improvement. Jan> What you are describing (i.e. raw gdb with a terminal interface) is Jan> almost exactly what M-x gdb does. The displaying the source part is Jan> part of M-x gdbsrc. Apparently for you gdbsrc sort of replaces M-x gdb Jan> (or at least used to). Does it still work if you do M-x gdbsrc. If not Jan> something else is broken. I guess I didn't explain it well. Why not try it yourself? I always have used M-x gdb. I know it's a somewhat raw interface - but now it's a lot rawer. And kindof broken. Two things in particular: 1) It pauses insisting that I hit return to continue. It did not do that before. 2) It has strange garbage in the output, look: Starting program: /home/nbecker/TES/Test14 Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- arg-name-end =0xbffffd24) at Test14.cc:23 Jan> Do you have the Sun package installed? I'm running on Linux. I *may* have downloaded the package for sun - I don't think I am using it.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: update packages screws gdb-mode 24 years, 4 months

Jan Vroonhof

nbecker(a)fred.net writes: > >> Instead of talking to gdb for me, it's acting as if I'm using raw gdb > >> with just a terminal interface. It didn't display the source (at > >> least, not at this point in the interaction), but it's asking me to > >> hit return or quit. Is M-x gdb hosed, or do I need to set some > >> variables to get reasonable behaviour? > > Jan> Are you sure you didn't want to type M-x gdbsrc ? > > I'm sure the behaviour of M-x gdb has changed, and it's not an > improvement. What you are describing (i.e. raw gdb with a terminal interface) is almost exactly what M-x gdb does. The displaying the source part is part of M-x gdbsrc. Apparently for you gdbsrc sort of replaces M-x gdb (or at least used to). Does it still work if you do M-x gdbsrc. If not something else is broken. Do you have the Sun package installed? Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: update packages screws gdb-mode 24 years, 4 months

Neal D. Becker

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: Jan> nbecker(a)fred.net writes: >> Instead of talking to gdb for me, it's acting as if I'm using raw gdb >> with just a terminal interface. It didn't display the source (at >> least, not at this point in the interaction), but it's asking me to >> hit return or quit. Is M-x gdb hosed, or do I need to set some >> variables to get reasonable behaviour? Jan> Are you sure you didn't want to type M-x gdbsrc ? I'm sure the behaviour of M-x gdb has changed, and it's not an improvement.

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta December 1999