[crash] Corsican-pre4, 24 bpp color
25 years, 9 months
Karl M. Hegbloom
Karl M. Hegbloom
The "Installation" file is at the end, after the `gdb' typescript.
This happens consistently on my laptop, which has a 24bpp 800x600
display.
`gdb xemacs'
`set args -geometry 80x35'
`run'
[ Options | Customize | Face... ] default, STATE, show all, INS, type
X, class color, bg dark, ... somewhere in here it will crash when I
click a button. The graphical buttons (Set, Save, ...) have vertical
stripes through them. It looks like it's not working right for 24bit
color. Here's a picture:
Here's the `gdb' output, followed by the "Installation" file, and a
typescript of the crash run without gdb, to get the lisp stack trace.
I also ran a `gdb' "where" on that core file.
Hope this helps someone who knows XEmacs inside and out to locate the
problem!
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
Re: Why XEmacs 21.0 should not have MS Windows binaries
25 years, 9 months
Darryl Okahata
Darryl Okahata
[ I forgot to cc: the xemacs-beta list. ]
Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> wrote:
> A version of this message in GSM WAV format is located at
>
> http://www.666.com/audio/mail/19980731-5-gsm-8k.wav
In addition to having some installer install a binary XEmacs, what
about add-on packages? While it would be nice to select packages to
install at install time, what about adding packages after installation
(or upgrading existing ones)? Having to go back to the installation
program to install packages isn't friendly, and it doesn't address
upgrades.
What if we modified package-get.el to optionally look on a local
disk before trying to download a remote file? If this is done, PC users
could have a CDROM with all of the packages on it. We wouldn't even
have to change the distribution format (e.g., .tar.gz files), as there
are some freely available PC programs that understand .tar.gz files.
[ For example, I've got a WIN32 version of djgpp's djtar (it's compiled
with MS VC++, not djgpp) which extracts .tar.gz just fine. ]
Of course, we'd need subprocesses to work in NT XEmacs. ;-(
-- Darryl Okahata
Internet: darrylo(a)sr.hp.com
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
Re: User Poll: Do you have access to PNG libraries?
25 years, 9 months
Oliver Graf
Oliver Graf
Oliver Graf <ograf(a)fga.de> writes:
> This could be solved with a colour scheme adaption by using a private palette
> tag withing the png. png allows the user to define his own tags. This does not
> break the png for standart viewers, but adds extra info for enhanced viewers
> (for example a extinsion which save the formular and edge params of a fractal
extension -------^^^^^^^^^
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
Re: User Poll: Do you have access to PNG libraries?
25 years, 9 months
Oliver Graf
Oliver Graf
Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk> writes:
> > What does 'normal colors stuffed' mean?
>
> By `normal' colours, I mean light background, dark foreground. If
> (like me) you have a dark background, then you need to use light
> foreground colours. Doing this for text is simple enough. Doing it for
> Xpm images is also straightforward (via xpm-color-symbols), provided
> that they have symbolic colours defined.
I understand (I also use a black background for all my XEmacsens and terms...)
> However, if all of the images simply contain hardcoded colour
> settings, the overall appearance tends to get worse the further your
> colour scheme is from that of whoever designed the images.
This could be solved with a colour scheme adaption by using a private palette
tag withing the png. png allows the user to define his own tags. This does not
break the png for standart viewers, but adds extra info for enhanced viewers
(for example a extinsion which save the formular and edge params of a fractal
to recreate the graphic).
> Worse still, once people start using full-colour images as icons and
> doing things like blending the edges of an image against a specific
> background colour, you end up with images that look crap against any
> other background colour. The one from the splash screen is a good
> example:
For this png provides full alpha. So the software can do the blending.
> > > > PNG provides lossless, highly compressed graphics with 24 bit color. It
> > > > is superior to everything that we are currently using.
> > > Except Xpm.
> >
> > Why is XPM superiour to PNG? Cause it's plain text?
>
> That's an advantage (IMHO), but the main issue for me is symbolic
> colour names.
We can also do this using png.
Regards,
Oliver.
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
Re: XEmacs Button
25 years, 9 months
SL Baur
SL Baur
Cool! Thanks. I'm adding this to XEmacs 21.
Did you see the "created by XEmacs" logo in the XEmacs distribution
etc/cbx.gif (cbx.png in XEmacs 21)?
Dave Finton <dfinton(a)d.umn.edu> writes in xemacs-webmaint(a)xemacs.org:
> I would like to thank the people responsible for XEmacs... a very nice
> piece of work indeed. :)
> At any rate I thought I'd let you know I created a "XEmacs Enhanced"
> button using the GIMP. I did this because I conducted several web
> searches yet failed to locate any such buttons on the web (seems to be
> several thousand "VI Enhanced" buttons lying around however). So I
> loaded up the image editor, and half an hour later came up with the
> final design. You can view it at:
> http://www.d.umn.edu/~dfinton
> It's at the bottom of the page. If my homepage looks like it's not
> completed yet, it's because it isn't. :)
> Feel free to use it, distribute it to your friends, make it a flag and
> display it to the whole world on top of Mount Everest, whatever you
> want.
> Thanks!
> - Dave
- 1 participants
- 0 comments