May 1998 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: msw graphics patch [supercedes cygw2.patch] 27 years, 1 month

Kirill M. Katsnelson

[I move this away from XEmacs-review, ok?] Some time ago, Hrvoje Niksic wrote... |+ | Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes: | | > My feeling is that we *should* postpone this to 21.1 at which point | > we can introduce system defined icons, flush right buttons etc and | > make the toolbar look *really* beautitful. | | I could agree with this, but I also have a plea: don't make it | excessively ugly, either. Please bear in mind that for most Windows | users this will be the first sight of XEmacs, and it is *crucial* that | we present XEmacs in a good light. I agree with Hrovje here. If this was not the first release, I definitely postponed this to 21.1. Kirill

1 participants
0 comments

build of xemacs-packages fails 27 years, 1 month

Michael Harnois

My effort to make bindist on the xemacs-packages cvs tree came to an abrupt and painful end when it hit skk: make[3]: Entering directory `/src/xemacs-packages/mule/skk/texi' /usr/src/xemacs/src/xemacs -batch -vanilla \ -eval '(setq buffer-file-coding-system-for-read (quote euc-jp))' \ skk.texi \ -eval '(unless (featurep (quote mule)) (kill-emacs 0))' \ -l texinfmt -f texinfo-format-buffer \ -eval '(setq buffer-file-coding-system (quote iso-2022-7))' \ -eval '(save-buffer 0)' File mode specification error: (void-function texinfo-mode) xemacs exiting.Cannot open load file: texinfmt make[3]: *** [skk.info] Error 255 make[3]: Leaving directory `/src/xemacs-packages/mule/skk/texi' make[2]: *** [texi] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/src/xemacs-packages/mule/skk' make[1]: *** [bindist] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/src/xemacs-packages/mule' make: *** [bindist] Error 2 -- Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA mharnois(a)sbt.net aa0bt(a)aa0bt.ampr.org Never, "for the sake of peace and quiet," deny your own experience or convictions. -- Dag Hammarskjold

1 participants
0 comments

[experimental PATCH] GC-Leak in tooltalk 27 years, 1 month

Gunnar Evermann

Hi everyone, I've finally found the bug which makes XEmacs crash if compiled with SUN-CC, -gung-ho and workshop support (as reported by Georg and myself, e.g. <13638.20762.848751.664065＠verve>, <199805041403.QAA00409(a)nats7.informatik.uni-hamburg.de>). I spend two days single-stepping through the GC and FByte_code :-) The two Lisp_Objects mentioned below get collected (before dumping I guess). In the dumped binary Tooltalk_Pattern_plist_str points to some string (in the locate-file-hashtable of some string of of the load-path vars), if a GC occurs before TT-Initialization it points to nowhere and everything goes to hell... I posted this to XEmacs-beta as well because I'm a complete novice to XEmacs-C-Internals and I guess the GC-stuff is a rather dangerous place to start hacking :-) So maybe the GC and/or TT-experts can comment -- is this the right way and why doesn't this show up when not using gung-ho? Anyway this fixes the problem for me (XEmacs starts up OK and after installing the pc and vc-packages TT-communication to workshop seems to work. Gunnar 1998-05-26 Gunnar Evermann <Gunnar.Evermann(a)nats.informatik.uni-hamburg.de> * tooltalk.c (vars_of_tooltalk) added staticpro for Tooltalk_Message_plist_str and Tooltalk_Pattern_plist_str --- src/tooltalk.c~ Fri May 1 03:11:07 1998 +++ src/tooltalk.c Tue May 26 15:31:36 1998 ＠＠ -1421,6 +1421,9 ＠＠ Tooltalk_Message_plist_str = build_string ("Tooltalk Message plist"); Tooltalk_Pattern_plist_str = build_string ("Tooltalk Pattern p plist"); + staticpro(&Tooltalk_Message_plist_str); + staticpro(&Tooltalk_Pattern_plist_str); + #define MAKE_CONSTANT(name) do { \ defsymbol (&Q_ ## name, #name); \ Fset (Q_ ## name, make_int (name)); \

1 participants
0 comments

Re: 21.0 beta41, cygwin32, error on exit 27 years, 1 month

Paul Stodghill

> Paul Stodghill <stodghil(a)CS.Cornell.EDU> writes: > > > I am getting the following error from XEmacs when I exit. I doesn't matter > > whether I invoke XEmacs from tcsh or bash. > > > bash.exe-2.01$ /usr/local/bin/xemacs -vanilla -f kill-emacs > > Error: No ExtNode to pop! > > bash.exe-2.01$ > > That's a known problem with linking XEmacs against Lesstif (a Free > Motif clone). What libraries are you linking? An old version of Lesstif. Consider this problem solved. Can't wait until the '-beta mail archive is up and running. :-) -- Paul Stodghill <stodghil(a)cs.cornell.edu> http://www.cs.cornell.edu/stodghil/

1 participants
0 comments

Re: 21.0 beta41, cygwin32, error on exit 27 years, 1 month

Paul Stodghill

> Paul Stodghill wrote: > > > I am getting the following error from XEmacs when I exit. I doesn't matter > > whether I invoke XEmacs from tcsh or bash. > > > > bash.exe-2.01$ /usr/local/bin/xemacs -vanilla -f kill-emacs > > Error: No ExtNode to pop! > > bash.exe-2.01$ > > This error is traditionally associated with linking XEmacs with older > version of Lesstif (<= 0.82). Are you linking against Lesstif? (Hmm, > seems like rather an odd question on Windows). Yup, that's the problem. #define LesstifVERSION_STRING "GNU Lesstif 0.81 alpha" And, yes, this is under Windows (NT, anyway).

1 participants
0 comments

Re: custom-file 27 years, 1 month

Jan Vroonhof

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes: > Just for the record, I agree with this. Even without `.xemacs/', > custom-file should default to something other than `.emacs'. To do > so, we must make sure that: > > 1) Old `.emacs' files with custom options are handled gracefully; > > 2) The new `.xemacs-custom' file is loaded automatically, after > `.emacs'. I suggest not using an .xemacs-custom file but use .xemacs/options.el even if we do not use .xemacs/init.el, because 1. We already have been doing it (unintentionnaly) and it seems to work. 2. Having an .xemacs-custom file is making the (eventual) migration to .xemacs/ based system even more difficult as it is yet another file to care for. 3. We have .xemacs anyway for the package system. Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: A couple of rebuilds later.... 27 years, 1 month

Hrvoje Niksic

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: > ... `custom-put' is an obsolete function not used anywhere in the core > lisp in xemacs-21/lisp. It was marked obsolete in 21-b39, now grep > doesn't find it at all. Yes, custom-put was introduced in early 20.3 (!) cycle, and I figured it was a good time to remove it now. The beta testers should just rebuild their `custom-put' files, and the rest of the world will never see custom-put anyway. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- "Silence!" cries Freydag. "I did not call thee in for a consultation!" "They are my innards! I will not have them misread by a poseur!"

1 participants
0 comments

b41 tarball missing add-little-package.sh 27 years, 1 month

Samuel Mikes

I downloaded and built b41 from the tarball in a fresh directory, and without my old lisp directories, to get a feel for how the package system works from scratch. While installing packages, I got errors about a missing 'add-little-package.sh', which I supplied from my xemacs-20.4 dist. Is this file intentionally not present, or is it an oversight? -- Sam Mikes smikes(a)alumni.hmc.edu

1 participants
0 comments

package question 27 years, 1 month

Andy Piper

I need to add jde-mode to auto-mode-alist for .java files when jde is installed. What is the correct way to do this? Can arbitrary code be added to auto-autoloads.el? andy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- " .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think" Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp

1 participants
0 comments

customize question 27 years, 1 month

Andy Piper

I would like to trap the customize "save" operation so that for my packages stuff "save" actually goes and gets the package. Is this possible? andy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- " .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think" Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp

1 participants
0 comments

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta May 1998