April 1998 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

[PATCH] Re: [SUCCESS] 21.0 "Pygmy-pre1" XEmacs Lucid (beta37) on i586-pc-linux 26 years, 8 months

Michael Sperber

>>>>> "Moiself" == Michael Sperber <sperber(a)Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De> writes: >>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: Stephen> However, according my understanding of something Steve Baur wrote, it Stephen> should be possible to run XEmacs with _nothing_ except the binary Stephen> itself, and at least manage the functionality of MS-Edit under DOS. Stephen> If that is a goal, then crashing just because it can't find any Stephen> packages, or even core Lisp, is not acceptable. Steve? Moiself> Right. This has little to do with path searching, but I have a set of Moiself> patches that make it go a lot further than it did. Still, it's very Moiself> much hardwired into the system that it can get at the core Lisp Moiself> auto-autoloads. Questions for Steve: Moiself> - Is being able to run a naked executable a priority? Moiself> - What's the rationale of auto-autoloads not being dumped? Strike all that. Here's how to make it both a naked executable and --no-autoloads work, along with some minor misc cleanups. lisp/ChangeLog 1998-04-23 Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> * x-menubar.el (default-menubar): font-menu-this-frame-only-p and font-menu-ignore-scaled-fonts don't have to be bound now; this gets us one step further towards making --no-autoloads work. * startup.el (normal-top-level): Load auto-autoloads only if lisp-directory is non-nil. * setup-paths.el (paths-construct-load-path): Made it robust against nil lisp-directory. * startup.el (startup-setup-paths-warning): Added `lisp-directory' to the list of variables that cause a warning when nil. * toolbar.el (init-toolbar-location): Now works even when there's no toolbar icon directory. Index: lisp/setup-paths.el =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs-20/lisp/setup-paths.el,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 setup-paths.el --- setup-paths.el 1998/04/23 02:07:55 1.9 +++ setup-paths.el 1998/04/23 17:37:44 ＠＠ -72,8 +72,9 ＠＠ (paths-find-recursive-load-path (list site-lisp-directory) paths-load-path-depth))) (lisp-load-path - (paths-find-recursive-load-path (list lisp-directory) - paths-load-path-depth))) + (and site-lisp-directory + (paths-find-recursive-load-path (list lisp-directory) + paths-load-path-depth)))) (append env-load-path early-package-load-path site-lisp-load-path Index: lisp/startup.el =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs-20/lisp/startup.el,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 startup.el --- startup.el 1998/04/17 07:17:03 1.18 +++ startup.el 1998/04/23 17:37:54 ＠＠ -395,7 +395,8 ＠＠ debug-paths)) (startup-setup-paths-warning)) - (if (not inhibit-autoloads) + (if (and (not inhibit-autoloads) + lisp-directory) (load (expand-file-name (file-name-sans-extension autoload-file-name) lisp-directory) nil t)) ＠＠ -1132,45 +1133,40 ＠＠ (erase-buffer) (buffer-disable-undo (current-buffer)) - (insert "Couldn't find an obvious default for the root of the " + (insert "Couldn't find an obvious default for the root of the\n" "XEmacs hierarchy.") - (let ((fill-column 76)) - (fill-region (point-min) (point-max))) - (princ "\nWARNING:\n" 'external-debugging-output) (princ (buffer-string) 'external-debugging-output))) (defun startup-setup-paths-warning () (let ((lock (if (boundp 'lock-directory) lock-directory 't)) - warnings message) + (warnings '())) (if (and (stringp lock) (null (file-directory-p lock))) (setq lock nil)) (cond - ((null (and exec-directory data-directory doc-directory load-path lock)) + ((null (and lisp-directory exec-directory data-directory doc-directory + load-path + lock)) (save-excursion (set-buffer (get-buffer-create " *warning-tmp*")) (erase-buffer) (buffer-disable-undo (current-buffer)) + (if (null lisp-directory) (push "lisp-directory" warnings)) (if (null lock) (push "lock-directory" warnings)) (if (null exec-directory) (push "exec-directory" warnings)) (if (null data-directory) (push "data-directory" warnings)) (if (null doc-directory) (push "doc-directory" warnings)) (if (null load-path) (push "load-path" warnings)) - (cond ((cdr (cdr warnings)) - (setq message (apply 'format "%s, %s, and %s" warnings))) - ((cdr warnings) - (setq message (apply 'format "%s and %s" warnings))) - (t (setq message (format "variable %s" (car warnings))))) - (insert "couldn't find an obvious default for " message - ", and there were no defaults specified in paths.h when " - "XEmacs was built. Perhaps some directories don't exist, " - "or the XEmacs executable, " (concat invocation-directory - invocation-name) - " is in a strange place?") - (let ((fill-column 76)) - (fill-region (point-min) (point-max))) + (insert "Couldn't find obvious defaults for:\n") + (while warnings + (insert (car warnings) "\n") + (setq warnings (cdr warnings))) + (insert "Perhaps some directories don't exist, " + "or the XEmacs executable,\n" (concat invocation-directory + invocation-name) + "\nis in a strange place?") (princ "\nWARNING:\n" 'external-debugging-output) (princ (buffer-string) 'external-debugging-output) Index: lisp/toolbar.el =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs-20/lisp/toolbar.el,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 toolbar.el --- toolbar.el 1998/04/23 02:07:56 1.7 +++ toolbar.el 1998/04/23 17:37:55 ＠＠ -94,9 +94,10 ＠＠ (defun init-toolbar-location () (if (not toolbar-icon-directory) - (setq toolbar-icon-directory - (file-name-as-directory - (locate-data-directory "toolbar"))))) + (let ((name (locate-data-directory "toolbar"))) + (if name + (setq toolbar-icon-directory + (file-name-as-directory name)))))) (defun init-toolbar-from-resources (locale) (if (and (featurep 'x) Index: lisp/update-elc.el =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs-20/lisp/update-elc.el,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 update-elc.el --- update-elc.el 1998/04/14 07:47:03 1.15 +++ update-elc.el 1998/04/23 17:37:55 ＠＠ -81,12 +81,6 ＠＠ (cons src update-elc-files-to-compile)))) (setq autol (cdr autol)))) -;; We must have some lisp support at this point -(let ((temp-path (expand-file-name "." (car load-path)))) - (setq load-path (nconc (directory-files temp-path t "^[^-.]" - nil 'dirs-only) - (cons temp-path load-path)))) - ;; (print (prin1-to-string update-elc-files-to-compile)) (let (preloaded-file-list site-load-packages) Index: lisp/x-menubar.el =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/CVSroot/XEmacs/xemacs-20/lisp/x-menubar.el,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 x-menubar.el --- x-menubar.el 1998/04/23 02:07:57 1.18 +++ x-menubar.el 1998/04/23 17:37:56 ＠＠ -619,7 +619,8 ＠＠ (customize-set-variable 'font-menu-this-frame-only-p (not font-menu-this-frame-only-p)) :style toggle - :selected font-menu-this-frame-only-p] + :selected (and (boundp 'font-menu-this-frame-only-p) + font-menu-this-frame-only-p)] ;; Why is this commented ? ;; ["Line Numbers" (line-number-mode nil) ;; :style toggle :selected line-number-mode] ＠＠ -674,7 +675,8 ＠＠ (customize-set-variable 'font-menu-ignore-scaled-fonts (not font-menu-ignore-scaled-fonts)) :style toggle - :selected font-menu-ignore-scaled-fonts] + :selected (and (boundp 'font-menu-ignore-scaled-fonts) + font-menu-ignore-scaled-fonts)] ) ,＠(if (featurep 'toolbar) '(("Toolbar Appearance" -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

1 participants
0 comments

[Failure '--external-widget=yes'] XEmacs 21.0-b37 "Pygmy-pre1", sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 26 years, 8 months

Adrian Aichner

Building (from CVS) with '--external-widget=yes' leads: "frame-x.c", line 2502: undefined symbol: popup Adrian > XEmacs Build Report as generated > by build-report-version $Revision: 1.39 $ follows: > Contents of /export/home/tmp/CVSroot/xemacs-20/Installation: > (Output from most recent run of ./configure)

1 participants
0 comments

coding-system lossage with eterm 26 years, 8 months

Glynn Clements

I installed eterm-1.04, and noticed that the CR characters are being eaten without eterm actually doing a carriage return, resulting in the `staircase effect'. Using (setq process-coding-system-alist '((".*" . binary))) fixed the problem, but it smells as if eterm is assuming that the coding system is appropriate rather than making it so. Is this MULE-related? Did anyone actually test eterm-1.04 on a MULE XEmacs? -- Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk>

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [SUCCESS] 21.0 "Pygmy-pre1" XEmacs Lucid (beta37) on i586-pc-linux 26 years, 8 months

Michael Sperber

>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: Stephen> However, according my understanding of something Steve Baur wrote, it Stephen> should be possible to run XEmacs with _nothing_ except the binary Stephen> itself, and at least manage the functionality of MS-Edit under DOS. Stephen> If that is a goal, then crashing just because it can't find any Stephen> packages, or even core Lisp, is not acceptable. Steve? Right. This has little to do with path searching, but I have a set of patches that make it go a lot further than it did. Still, it's very much hardwired into the system that it can get at the core Lisp auto-autoloads. Questions for Steve: - Is being able to run a naked executable a priority? - What's the rationale of auto-autoloads not being dumped? -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

1 participants
0 comments

Re: options menu port to Custom 2/2 26 years, 8 months

Jan Vroonhof

Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes: > OK. Then, we should keep the functionalities related to saving the > faces that were not customized too (I mean in the option saving process). No. Just ditch is from the options menu altogether but keep the M-x edit-faces command somewhere. > [ using lazy-lock-mode as a customize variable] I still am not sure this is a good thing to do. The trouble is that a lot of other stuff tests these variables and probaly don't like it that they suddenlky have a default value. Can you not use lazy-shot-auto-enable or some other variable that is not used internally in lazy-shot. > > Please look at the use of global-font-lock mode and the major-mode stuff in > > lazy-lock from current FSF EMacsen. > > I will. However, it sounds more like a kludge. What is it compared to > font-lock-auto-fontify ? It allows a way to turn lazy-lock and font-lock on and off based on major mode (i.e. combining font-lock-auto-fontify and the font-lock-mode-enable-list font-lock-mode-disable-list variables). This makes it easier to Customize probably. Or even switch to the "f-l-support-modes" stuff. Jan P.S. I still think it would be nicer if one could just customize the approprate mode specific hook.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: XEmacs-20.4; [Bug] char syntax `inherit' 26 years, 8 months

Ben Wing

This is probably something that I messed up in the process of emulating FSF Emacs. Oops. Christoph Wedler wrote: > [Sorry, if this has been fixed in XEmacs-21.0.] > > The meaning of char-syntax seems to have been changed in XEmacs-20.X > (probably all 20.X). It now seems to mean: inherit from > (standard-syntax-table) at the time when the char/code for inherit is > set, which isn't useful at all. > > It follows a file which shows this: > > xemacs -no-site-file -q -l ~/emacs/.bugs/bug-inherit.el.el & > > If you answer the question with `y', you get > > Char syntax: , TeX syntax: ＠, standard syntax: \ > > which is strange, since ＠ means inherit => the Char syntax should be the > same as the standard syntax. This is the case when you answer the > question with `n': > > Char syntax: \, TeX syntax: ＠, standard syntax: \ > > ;;; bug-inherit.el --- XEmacs-20.4; [Bug] char syntax `inherit' > > (load "tex-site") ; AucTeX w/ `TeX-mode-syntax-table' > (if (y-or-n-p "Show sequence with bug? ") (require 'latex)) > (modify-syntax-entry ?\237 "\\" (standard-syntax-table)) > > (find-file "~/.junk-or-empty.tex") > (message "Char syntax: %c, TeX syntax: %c, standard syntax: %c" > (char-syntax ?\237) > (char-syntax-from-code (get-char-table ?\237 TeX-mode-syntax-table)) > (char-syntax-from-code (get-char-table ?\237 (standard-syntax-table)))) -- This message composed using voice recognition software and foot pedals. (No keyboards were harmed while composing this message.)

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Re: [SUCCESS] b36 on MS Windows native 26 years, 8 months

Michael Sperber

>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: sb> Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes: >> Now that Stephen Turnbull also thinks core Lisp should precede >> packages, I'm inclined to change it (trivial to do). This will >> coincidentally fix the above problem. Steve? sb> No. The current behavior of having packages override the core lisp is sb> the correct one, I believe. If you need core lisp in front packages, sb> can't you use the very-late-package technique used to run with sb> packages from previous XEmacs versions? Since the auto-autoloads compilation problems seems fixed in b37-pre1, I concur. (One less patch to cook up ... :-} ) If you've got shadowings between packages and core Lisp, there's a high chance you're screwed either way. -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

2 participants
1 comments

Re: Failure b36 on BSDI 3.1 26 years, 8 months

Ben Wing

Don't do this, instead just rename the XEmacs function using pre-processor defines. Kirill M. Katsnelson wrote: > Some time ago, William M. Perry wrote... > |+ > | realpath.o: Definition of symbol _realpath (multiply defined) > | getcwd.o: Definition of symbol _realpath (multiply defined) > | make[1]: *** [temacs] Error 1 > | > | The comments in configure.in seem to indicate there are problems with > | bsd/os 3 with realpath, so I don't want to just remove realpath.o :) Is > | there some voodoo we should be passing to the linker to make it shut up? > > -zmuldefs? -- This message composed using voice recognition software and foot pedals. (No keyboards were harmed while composing this message.)

1 participants
0 comments

Re: [Q] standard-display-european ? 26 years, 8 months

Ben Wing

Old Didier Verna wrote: > Does this function still make sense with mule, or is it an old stuff ? -- This message composed using voice recognition software and foot pedals. (No keyboards were harmed while composing this message.)

1 participants
0 comments

[Success] 21.0 "Pygmy-pre1" XEmacs Lucid (beta37) on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00 26 years, 8 months

Marcus Thiessel

Fine! But the 'allocate_nearest_color returned 0!!!' message was once again droped just as XEmacs comes up. > XEmacs Build Report as generated > by build-report-version 1.35 follows: > Contents of /opt/src/xemacs-21.0-b36/Installation: > (Output from most recent run of ./configure) uname -a: HP-UX tmbbwtx B.11.00 A 9000/720 16954192 two-user license ./configure 'hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00' '--dynamic=no' '--prefix=/usr/local/xemacs' '--with-x' '--with-dialogs=motif' '--with-xface=yes' '--with-tty=yes' '--x-includes=/usr/include/Motif1.2_R6 -I/usr/include/X11R6' '--x-libraries=/usr/lib/Motif1.2_R6 -L/usr/lib/X11R6' '--with-database=dbm' '--with-pop' '--mail-locking=lockf' '--site-includes=/usr/contrib/include -I/usr/local/include' '--error-checking=none' '--extra-verbose' '--site-libraries=/usr/contrib/lib -L/usr/local/lib' '--with-sound=no' '--with-xmu' '--with-mule=yes' '--with-cde=yes' '--with-session' '--with-tooltalk=yes' '--with-gcc=no' '--with-gnu-make=no' '--gung-ho' '--package-path=/opt/src/packages' '--cflags=+DA1.1 +DD32 +O2 +Onolimit +Odataprefetch +Oentrysched +Oprocelim +Olibcalls' XEmacs 21.0-b37 "Pygmy-pre1" configured for `hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00'. Where should the build process find the source code? /opt/src/xemacs-21.0-b36 What installation prefix should install use? /usr/local/xemacs What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use? `s/hpux11.h' and `m/hp800.h' What compiler should XEmacs be built with? cc -Ae +DA1.1 +DD32 +O2 +Onolimit +Odataprefetch +Oentrysched +Oprocelim +Olibcalls Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? yes What window system should XEmacs use? x11 Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/dt/include /usr/include/Motif1.2_R6 -I/usr/include/X11R6 /usr/contrib/X11R6/include Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/dt/lib /usr/lib/Motif1.2_R6 -L/usr/lib/X11R6 /usr/contrib/X11R6/lib Additional header files: /usr/contrib/include -I/usr/local/include Additional libraries: /usr/contrib/lib -L/usr/local/lib Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for X-Face message headers. Compiling in support for JPEG image conversion. Compiling in support for DBM. Compiling in Mule (multi-lingual) support. Compiling in XIM (X11R5+ I18N input method) support. Using Motif to provide XIM support. Compiling in support for CDE. Compiling in support for ToolTalk. Compiling in support for OffiX. Compiling in support for proper session-management. Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Motif dialog boxes. Compiling in DLL support. movemail will use "lockf" for locking mail spool files. Using POP for mail access Using Lisp_Objects with minimal tagbits. Using indexed lrecord implementation. Compiling in extra code for debugging. Compiling in code for checking XEmacs memory usage. > /opt/src/xemacs-21.0-b36/beta.err does not exist!

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta April 1998