Re: Xft and X-Symbols???
20 years, 1 month
Stephen J. Turnbull
Stephen J. Turnbull
>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Holst <holst(a)mathematik.uni-mainz.de> writes:
Stefan> I was very happy, when I first saw your xft branch did
Stefan> compile.
Ahh, it's not really mine; my initials got on it for historical
reasons. Credit goes mostly to Matthias Neubauer and Eric Knauel and
a couple of Russian guys whose names I forget (mea maxima culpa).
Stefan> And even more after I saw the antialiazing result! The
Stefan> reason for me doing this was, that I wanted to have the
Stefan> same look of xemacs on windows and on linux. The truetype
Stefan> font that I got adicted to under windows did look really
Stefan> ugly with anti-aliazing.
You mean "without anti-aliasing", right?
Stefan> At the moment I' mainly using xemacs to finish my PhD
Stefan> in. A package that has become indispensible for me is
Stefan> x-symbols. This symbolic fonts increase the readability of
Stefan> the readability of my latex files extremely.
Stefan> I would really like to know how to get these fonts
Stefan> displayed in xemacs with your xft patch. I would
Stefan> appreciate any suggestion! Sincerely yours
IIRC, x-symbol defines a charset then uses an x-symbol-specific font
(distributed with x-symbol) to display it.
Unfortunately, the way things work currently is that the Xft
font-finding code _always_ returns a font, but it comes first in the
process, so the code to find a legacy X11 font never gets invoked.
I'm not sure how to deal with this, as the documents for fontconfig
and Xft are very unclear. It would be nice to tweak a parameter and
let Xft do all the work, but probably I need to check for a legacy
XLFD and if so find and use the X font using our old code.
I don't know when I'll have time to work on this (maybe late next
week, maybe not for 6 weeks), and I don't know how long it will take
to come up with a good solution. So I'll CC to xemacs-beta, where one
of the other Xft hackers may be able to use the hint to get things
moving for you.
If you want to help track this down, first cvs update to current
version of sjt-xft which has some important fixes, then edit the file
src/xft-fonts.c, find the initialization
int debug_xft = 0;
and change it to
int debug_xft = 1;
Then when you're using x-symbol, watch the console output which should
show Xft trying to find the x-symbol font and substituting some other
font for it. (I don't know when x-symbol loads its fonts, so this
could happen at initialization, or when your latex files get loaded by
session.el or desktop.el, or when you turn on x-symbol mode, or even
at some apparently random time.)
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- 2 participants
- 2 comments
non-xpg4 compliant /bin/sh and Sun compilation ?
20 years, 1 month
Sylvain Mazet
Sylvain Mazet
Hi,
compiling XEmacs-21.5.19 on Sun (solaris 5.8),
I get this error when gnumaking:
--------------------------------------------------
Dumping under the name xemacs
if test -f dump-size; then \
../lib-src/insert-data-in-exec temacs xemacs.dmp xemacs ` ./temacs -si`; \
ret=$? ; \
if test ${ret} -eq 2; then \
rm -f dump-size ; \
else \
if test ${ret} -eq 1; then \
exit 1; \
else \
chmod +x xemacs ; \
fi ; \
fi ; \
fi
dumped_data found at offset 0x45c208, patching.
dumped_data found at offset 0x45c208, patching.
if ! test -f dump-size; then \
../lib-src/insert-data-in-exec -s xemacs.dmp > dump-size ; \
rm -f dump-data.o xemacs xemacs.dmp temacs;\
gnumake xemacs; \
fi
/bin/sh: !: not found
--------------------------------------------------
And then compilation goes on to completion....
I did set
CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/xpg4/bin/sh
in my environment before configuring.
I found that changing
SHELL=/bin/sh
to
SHELL=/usr/xpg4/bin/sh
in src/GNUmakefile
removes the error.
It seems to me that
SHELL=/bin/sh
is hard coded in the Makefile.in.in files,
and triggers the same kind of problem as for
the configure script.
I can provide more info if needed,
Sylvain Mazet.
- 4 participants
- 5 comments
[PATCH] Time to consider pending-del default
20 years, 1 month
Ben Wing
Ben Wing
I'd like to get this resolved. I know that Mike Sperber doesn't like this,
but I think we need to come to a vote.
Comments?
Index: xemacs-packages/pc/pending-del.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/packages/xemacs-packages/pc/pending-del.el,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 pending-del.el
--- xemacs-packages/pc/pending-del.el 2002/05/23 04:41:58 1.10
+++ xemacs-packages/pc/pending-del.el 2005/01/31 20:56:08
＠＠ -37,7 +37,7 ＠＠
;;; Code:
;;;###autoload
-(defcustom pending-delete-mode nil
+(defcustom pending-delete-mode t
"Non-nil when Pending Delete mode is enabled. In Pending Delete mode, typed
text replaces the selected region. Normally, you shouldn't modify this
variable by hand, but use the function `pending-delete-mode' instead. However,
- 10 participants
- 15 comments
It is a great link for sale on quality ink products.
20 years, 1 month
emile lamontagne
emile lamontagne
If you want to reduce the expenditure on brand name inks, just check our
site for a wide selection of inks on sale.
Select from a full selection of ink products online.
If you need the latest information on the sale, please contact the customer
support.
Check our discount store for a full range of ink products on sale.
Select quality products provided by Apple, Lexmark, Brother, NEC, Xerox,
Canon, Compaq and more others online. Customers have the right to choose and
save.
http://jqlf.vjOa.smilingunity.com/5w9/
Check out the timely shipping service. For US orders, it takes 2 to 3 days.
Buton Sunday the nations defense minister said there is no deadline for the
troops to be out.to talk about schemes and coverages. And the Patriots
coaches deservedly are credited for devising
has been undermined by notalents, or inadequate talents."We, right here in
this room," McGinestdiscredited6 circumambulate 7encompassing cucking
stoolegalitarians
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
[Success] XEmacs 21.5-b19 "chives" (+CVS-20050224) i586-pc-win32
20 years, 1 month
Adrian Aichner
Adrian Aichner
This build contains initial region-tests.el results.
It also contains my pending patch to sorted output of
M-x show-memory-usage
[I could swear I sent this early today, but can't find it in the
drafts, nor the mailman queue.]
Best regards,
Adrian
> XEmacs Build Report generated by emacs-version
> 21.5 (beta19) "chives" (+CVS-20050224) XEmacs Lucid
> with system-configuration
> i586-pc-win32
> follows:
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\Installation:
> (Output from most recent run of ./configure)
OS version:
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
OS: Windows_NT
XEmacs 21.5-b19 "chives" (+CVS-20050224) configured for `i586-pc-win32'.
Building XEmacs using "NMAKE".
Building XEmacs using make flags " ".
Building XEmacs in source tree "c:\\Hacking\\cvs.xemacs.org\\XEmacs\\xemacs-21.5-clean".
For src, using compiler "cl -nologo -W3 -DSTRICT -Zi -O2 -G5 -Ob2 -MDd -c -TP -Ic:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\inc -Ic:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\src -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\xpm-3.4k" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\xpm-3.4k\lib" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\libpng-1.0.2" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\zlib" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\tiff-v3.4\libtiff" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\jpeg-6b" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\compface" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\zlib" -DHAVE_MS_WINDOWS -DHAVE_XPM -DFOR_MSW -DHAVE_GIF -DHAVE_PNG -DHAVE_TIFF -DHAVE_JPEG -DHAVE_XFACE -DHAVE_ZLIB -DHAVE_MENUBARS -DHAVE_SCROLLBARS -DHAVE_TOOLBARS -DHAVE_WIDGETS -DHAVE_DIALOGS -DHAVE_NATIVE_SOUND -DMULE -DPDUMP -DUSE_KKCC -DSYSTEM_MALLOC -DDEBUG_XEMACS -D_DEBUG -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DWIN32_NATIVE -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPATH_VERSION=\"21.5-b19\" -DPATH_PROGNAME=\"xemacs\" -DEMACS_VERSION=\"21.5-b19\" -DEMACS_PROGNAME=\"xemacs\" -DSTACK_TRACE_EYE_CATCHER=xema!
cs_21_5_b19_i586_pc_win32 -DPATH_PREFIX=\"..\" -DEMACS_MAJOR_VERSION=21 -DEMACS_MINOR_VERSION=5 -DEMACS_BETA_VERSION=19 -DXEMACS_CODENAME=\""chives"\" -DXEMACS_EXTRA_NAME=\"(+CVS-20050224)\" -DEMACS_CONFIGURATION=\"i586-pc-win32\" -DPATH_PACKAGEPATH=\""~\\.xemacs;;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\site-packages;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\mule-packages;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\xemacs-packages"\"".
For lib-src, using compiler "cl -nologo -W3 -DSTRICT -Zi -O2 -G5 -Ob2 -MDd -Ic:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lib-src -Ic:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\src -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DWIN32_NATIVE".
Compiling as C++.
Installing XEmacs in "c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\XEmacs-21.5-b19".
Package path is "~\\.xemacs;;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\site-packages;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\mule-packages;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\xemacs-packages".
Compiling in support for Microsoft Windows native GUI.
Compiling in international (MULE) support.
Compiling in support for XPM images.
Compiling in support for GIF images.
Compiling in support for PNG images.
Compiling in support for TIFF images.
Compiling in support for JPEG images.
Compiling in support for X-Face message headers.
Compiling in support for GZIP compression/decompression.
Compiling in support for toolbars.
Compiling in support for dialogs.
Compiling in support for widgets.
Compiling in support for native sounds.
Using portable dumper.
Using system malloc.
Using DLL version of C runtime library.
Compiling in debugging support (no slowdown).
Compiling with optimization.
Using new experimental GC algorithms.
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\xemacs-21.5-clean-cvs-update.err
> keeping lines matching
> "^--\[\[\|\]\]$\|^\(cd\|n?make\)\s-\|errors?\|warnings?\|pure.*\(space\|size\)\|hides\b\|strange\|shadowings\|^Compil\(ing\s-+in\|ation\)\|^Using\|not\s-+found\|^While\s-+compiling.*\(
\s-+.+\)*\|^Note:\|Installing\|[Ff]ile(s) copied\|\s-+tests\s-+\|^[A-Z] [^ ]+$\|^Wrong number of arguments:\|^ \*\* "
> and then deleting lines matching
> "confl.*with.*auto-inlining\|^Formatting:"
cd c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\
Compilation started at Fri Feb 25 01:27:02 2005 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
? gunzip-error.txt
? nt/xemacs-21.5-clean-make-all-texinfo-error.err
P version.sh
M lisp/ChangeLog
M lisp/diagnose.el
cvs server: Updating tests
cvs server: Updating tests/DLL
Compilation finished at Fri Feb 25 01:28:16
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\xemacs-21.5-clean-make-install.err
> keeping lines matching
> "^--\[\[\|\]\]$\|^\(cd\|n?make\)\s-\|errors?\|warnings?\|pure.*\(space\|size\)\|hides\b\|strange\|shadowings\|^Compil\(ing\s-+in\|ation\)\|^Using\|not\s-+found\|^While\s-+compiling.*\(
\s-+.+\)*\|^Note:\|Installing\|[Ff]ile(s) copied\|\s-+tests\s-+\|^[A-Z] [^ ]+$\|^Wrong number of arguments:\|^ \*\* "
> and then deleting lines matching
> "confl.*with.*auto-inlining\|^Formatting:"
cd c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\
nmake /f xemacs.mak install
Compilation started at Fri Feb 25 01:28:43 2005 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Installing XEmacs in "c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\XEmacs-21.5-b19".
Using load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lisp\)
Using module-load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\modules)
While compiling the end of the data in file c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lisp\diagnose.el:
** the function sort-numeric-fields is not known to be defined.
Using load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lisp\)
Using module-load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\modules)
Installing in c:\Program Files\XEmacs\XEmacs-21.5-b19 ...
1 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
11 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
496 File(s) copied
161 File(s) copied
585 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
1 File(s) copied
Compilation finished at Fri Feb 25 01:33:32
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\xemacs-21.5-clean-make-check-temacs.err
> keeping lines matching
> "^--\[\[\|\]\]$\|^\(cd\|n?make\)\s-\|errors?\|warnings?\|pure.*\(space\|size\)\|hides\b\|strange\|shadowings\|^Compil\(ing\s-+in\|ation\)\|^Using\|not\s-+found\|^While\s-+compiling.*\(
\s-+.+\)*\|^Note:\|Installing\|[Ff]ile(s) copied\|\s-+tests\s-+\|^[A-Z] [^ ]+$\|^Wrong number of arguments:\|^ \*\* "
> and then deleting lines matching
> "confl.*with.*auto-inlining\|^Formatting:"
cd c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\
nmake /f xemacs.mak check-temacs
Compilation started at Fri Feb 25 01:33:55 2005 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Using load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lisp\)
Using module-load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\modules)
base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
byte-compiler-tests.el: 66 of 66 tests successful (100%).
38 tests skipped because can't defadvice.
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
database-tests.el: No tests run.
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
lisp-tests.el: 3672 of 3672 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
mule-tests.el: 232 of 236 tests successful ( 98%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
Unexpected error (void-function executable-find) while executing interpreted code.
Unexpected error (void-function executable-find) while executing byte-compiled code.
os-tests.el: No tests run.
Unexpected error (void-function executable-find) while executing interpreted code
Unexpected error (void-function executable-find) while executing byte-compiled code
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
regexp-tests.el: 350 of 350 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
region-tests.el: 28 of 28 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
syntax-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
2 tests skipped because c-mode unavailable.
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
tag-tests.el: 6 of 6 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
weak-tests.el: 140 of 140 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
byte-compiler-tests.el: 66 of 66 tests successful (100%).
c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
database-tests.el: No tests run.
extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
lisp-tests.el: 3672 of 3672 tests successful (100%).
md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
mule-tests.el: 232 of 236 tests successful ( 98%).
os-tests.el: No tests run.
regexp-tests.el: 350 of 350 tests successful (100%).
region-tests.el: 28 of 28 tests successful (100%).
symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
syntax-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
tag-tests.el: 6 of 6 tests successful (100%).
weak-tests.el: 140 of 140 tests successful (100%).
Compilation finished at Fri Feb 25 01:36:25
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\xemacs-21.5-clean-make-check.err
> keeping lines matching
> "^--\[\[\|\]\]$\|^\(cd\|n?make\)\s-\|errors?\|warnings?\|pure.*\(space\|size\)\|hides\b\|strange\|shadowings\|^Compil\(ing\s-+in\|ation\)\|^Using\|not\s-+found\|^While\s-+compiling.*\(
\s-+.+\)*\|^Note:\|Installing\|[Ff]ile(s) copied\|\s-+tests\s-+\|^[A-Z] [^ ]+$\|^Wrong number of arguments:\|^ \*\* "
> and then deleting lines matching
> "confl.*with.*auto-inlining\|^Formatting:"
cd c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\
nmake /f xemacs.mak check
Compilation started at Fri Feb 25 01:38:15 2005 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
byte-compiler-tests.el: 104 of 104 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
database-tests.el: No tests run.
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
lisp-tests.el: 3672 of 3672 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
mule-tests.el: 232 of 236 tests successful ( 98%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
os-tests.el: 10 of 20 tests successful ( 50%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
regexp-tests.el: 350 of 350 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
region-tests.el: 28 of 28 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
syntax-tests.el: 60 of 60 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
tag-tests.el: 6 of 6 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
weak-tests.el: 140 of 140 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
byte-compiler-tests.el: 104 of 104 tests successful (100%).
c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
database-tests.el: No tests run.
extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
lisp-tests.el: 3672 of 3672 tests successful (100%).
md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
mule-tests.el: 232 of 236 tests successful ( 98%).
os-tests.el: 10 of 20 tests successful ( 50%).
regexp-tests.el: 350 of 350 tests successful (100%).
region-tests.el: 28 of 28 tests successful (100%).
symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
syntax-tests.el: 60 of 60 tests successful (100%).
tag-tests.el: 6 of 6 tests successful (100%).
weak-tests.el: 140 of 140 tests successful (100%).
Compilation finished at Fri Feb 25 01:40:52
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
[Success] XEmacs 21.5-b19 "chives" (+CVS-20050224) i586-pc-win32
20 years, 1 month
Adrian Aichner
Adrian Aichner
> XEmacs Build Report generated by emacs-version
> 21.5 (beta18) "chestnut" (+CVS-20050203) XEmacs Lucid
> with system-configuration
> i586-pc-win32
> follows:
Initial region-tests.el results, including my diagnose.el patch for
sorted
show-memory-usage
output.
Good night,
Adrian
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\Installation:
> (Output from most recent run of ./configure)
OS version:
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
OS: Windows_NT
XEmacs 21.5-b19 "chives" (+CVS-20050224) configured for `i586-pc-win32'.
Building XEmacs using "NMAKE".
Building XEmacs using make flags " ".
Building XEmacs in source tree "c:\\Hacking\\cvs.xemacs.org\\XEmacs\\xemacs-21.5-clean".
For src, using compiler "cl -nologo -W3 -DSTRICT -Zi -O2 -G5 -Ob2 -MDd -c -TP -Ic:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\inc -Ic:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\src -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\xpm-3.4k" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\xpm-3.4k\lib" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\libpng-1.0.2" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\zlib" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\tiff-v3.4\libtiff" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\jpeg-6b" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\compface" -I"c:\Hacking\libs4xemacs\zlib" -DHAVE_MS_WINDOWS -DHAVE_XPM -DFOR_MSW -DHAVE_GIF -DHAVE_PNG -DHAVE_TIFF -DHAVE_JPEG -DHAVE_XFACE -DHAVE_ZLIB -DHAVE_MENUBARS -DHAVE_SCROLLBARS -DHAVE_TOOLBARS -DHAVE_WIDGETS -DHAVE_DIALOGS -DHAVE_NATIVE_SOUND -DMULE -DPDUMP -DUSE_KKCC -DSYSTEM_MALLOC -DDEBUG_XEMACS -D_DEBUG -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DWIN32_NATIVE -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPATH_VERSION=\"21.5-b19\" -DPATH_PROGNAME=\"xemacs\" -DEMACS_VERSION=\"21.5-b19\" -DEMACS_PROGNAME=\"xemacs\" -DSTACK_TRACE_EYE_CATCHER=xema!
cs_21_5_b19_i586_pc_win32 -DPATH_PREFIX=\"..\" -DEMACS_MAJOR_VERSION=21 -DEMACS_MINOR_VERSION=5 -DEMACS_BETA_VERSION=19 -DXEMACS_CODENAME=\""chives"\" -DXEMACS_EXTRA_NAME=\"(+CVS-20050224)\" -DEMACS_CONFIGURATION=\"i586-pc-win32\" -DPATH_PACKAGEPATH=\""~\\.xemacs;;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\site-packages;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\mule-packages;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\xemacs-packages"\"".
For lib-src, using compiler "cl -nologo -W3 -DSTRICT -Zi -O2 -G5 -Ob2 -MDd -Ic:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lib-src -Ic:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\src -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DWIN32_NATIVE".
Compiling as C++.
Installing XEmacs in "c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\XEmacs-21.5-b19".
Package path is "~\\.xemacs;;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\site-packages;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\mule-packages;c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\xemacs-packages".
Compiling in support for Microsoft Windows native GUI.
Compiling in international (MULE) support.
Compiling in support for XPM images.
Compiling in support for GIF images.
Compiling in support for PNG images.
Compiling in support for TIFF images.
Compiling in support for JPEG images.
Compiling in support for X-Face message headers.
Compiling in support for GZIP compression/decompression.
Compiling in support for toolbars.
Compiling in support for dialogs.
Compiling in support for widgets.
Compiling in support for native sounds.
Using portable dumper.
Using system malloc.
Using DLL version of C runtime library.
Compiling in debugging support (no slowdown).
Compiling with optimization.
Using new experimental GC algorithms.
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\xemacs-21.5-clean-cvs-update.err
> keeping lines matching
> "^--\[\[\|\]\]$\|^\(cd\|n?make\)\s-\|errors?\|warnings?\|pure.*\(space\|size\)\|hides\b\|strange\|shadowings\|^Compil\(ing\s-+in\|ation\)\|^Using\|not\s-+found\|^While\s-+compiling.*\(
\s-+.+\)*\|^Note:\|Installing\|[Ff]ile(s) copied\|\s-+tests\s-+\|^[A-Z] [^ ]+$\|^Wrong number of arguments:\|^ \*\* "
> and then deleting lines matching
> "confl.*with.*auto-inlining\|^Formatting:"
cd c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\
Compilation started at Fri Feb 25 01:27:02 2005 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
? gunzip-error.txt
? nt/xemacs-21.5-clean-make-all-texinfo-error.err
P version.sh
M lisp/ChangeLog
M lisp/diagnose.el
cvs server: Updating tests
cvs server: Updating tests/DLL
Compilation finished at Fri Feb 25 01:28:16
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\xemacs-21.5-clean-make-all.err
> keeping lines matching
> "^--\[\[\|\]\]$\|^\(cd\|n?make\)\s-\|errors?\|warnings?\|pure.*\(space\|size\)\|hides\b\|strange\|shadowings\|^Compil\(ing\s-+in\|ation\)\|^Using\|not\s-+found\|^While\s-+compiling.*\(
\s-+.+\)*\|^Note:\|Installing\|[Ff]ile(s) copied\|\s-+tests\s-+\|^[A-Z] [^ ]+$\|^Wrong number of arguments:\|^ \*\* "
> and then deleting lines matching
> "confl.*with.*auto-inlining\|^Formatting:"
cd c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\
nmake /f xemacs.mak all
Compilation started at Thu Feb 24 10:53:38 2005 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Installing XEmacs in "c:\\Program Files\\XEmacs\\XEmacs-21.5-b19".
Using load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lisp\)
Using module-load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\modules)
Using load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lisp\)
Using module-load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\modules)
Compilation finished at Thu Feb 24 10:56:55
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\xemacs-21.5-clean-make-check-temacs.err
> keeping lines matching
> "^--\[\[\|\]\]$\|^\(cd\|n?make\)\s-\|errors?\|warnings?\|pure.*\(space\|size\)\|hides\b\|strange\|shadowings\|^Compil\(ing\s-+in\|ation\)\|^Using\|not\s-+found\|^While\s-+compiling.*\(
\s-+.+\)*\|^Note:\|Installing\|[Ff]ile(s) copied\|\s-+tests\s-+\|^[A-Z] [^ ]+$\|^Wrong number of arguments:\|^ \*\* "
> and then deleting lines matching
> "confl.*with.*auto-inlining\|^Formatting:"
cd c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\
nmake /f xemacs.mak check-temacs
Compilation started at Fri Feb 25 01:33:55 2005 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Using load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\lisp\)
Using module-load-path (c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\modules)
base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
byte-compiler-tests.el: 66 of 66 tests successful (100%).
38 tests skipped because can't defadvice.
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
database-tests.el: No tests run.
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
lisp-tests.el: 3672 of 3672 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
mule-tests.el: 232 of 236 tests successful ( 98%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
Unexpected error (void-function executable-find) while executing interpreted code.
Unexpected error (void-function executable-find) while executing byte-compiled code.
os-tests.el: No tests run.
Unexpected error (void-function executable-find) while executing interpreted code
Unexpected error (void-function executable-find) while executing byte-compiled code
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
regexp-tests.el: 350 of 350 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
region-tests.el: 28 of 28 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
syntax-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
2 tests skipped because c-mode unavailable.
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
tag-tests.el: 6 of 6 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
weak-tests.el: 140 of 140 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
byte-compiler-tests.el: 66 of 66 tests successful (100%).
c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
database-tests.el: No tests run.
extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
lisp-tests.el: 3672 of 3672 tests successful (100%).
md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
mule-tests.el: 232 of 236 tests successful ( 98%).
os-tests.el: No tests run.
regexp-tests.el: 350 of 350 tests successful (100%).
region-tests.el: 28 of 28 tests successful (100%).
symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
syntax-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
tag-tests.el: 6 of 6 tests successful (100%).
weak-tests.el: 140 of 140 tests successful (100%).
Compilation finished at Fri Feb 25 01:36:25
> Contents of c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\xemacs-21.5-clean-make-check.err
> keeping lines matching
> "^--\[\[\|\]\]$\|^\(cd\|n?make\)\s-\|errors?\|warnings?\|pure.*\(space\|size\)\|hides\b\|strange\|shadowings\|^Compil\(ing\s-+in\|ation\)\|^Using\|not\s-+found\|^While\s-+compiling.*\(
\s-+.+\)*\|^Note:\|Installing\|[Ff]ile(s) copied\|\s-+tests\s-+\|^[A-Z] [^ ]+$\|^Wrong number of arguments:\|^ \*\* "
> and then deleting lines matching
> "confl.*with.*auto-inlining\|^Formatting:"
cd c:\Hacking\cvs.xemacs.org\XEmacs\xemacs-21.5-clean\nt\
nmake /f xemacs.mak check
Compilation started at Fri Feb 25 01:38:15 2005 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
byte-compiler-tests.el: 104 of 104 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
database-tests.el: No tests run.
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
lisp-tests.el: 3672 of 3672 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
mule-tests.el: 232 of 236 tests successful ( 98%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
os-tests.el: 10 of 20 tests successful ( 50%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
regexp-tests.el: 350 of 350 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
region-tests.el: 28 of 28 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
syntax-tests.el: 60 of 60 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
tag-tests.el: 6 of 6 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
weak-tests.el: 140 of 140 tests successful (100%).
0 errors that should have been generated, but weren't
0 wrong-error failures
base64-tests.el: 1234 of 1234 tests successful (100%).
byte-compiler-tests.el: 104 of 104 tests successful (100%).
c-tests.el: 4 of 4 tests successful (100%).
case-tests.el: 1148 of 1148 tests successful (100%).
ccl-tests.el: 4570 of 4570 tests successful (100%).
database-tests.el: No tests run.
extent-tests.el: 194 of 194 tests successful (100%).
hash-table-tests.el: 9866 of 9866 tests successful (100%).
lisp-tests.el: 3672 of 3672 tests successful (100%).
md5-tests.el: 56 of 56 tests successful (100%).
mule-tests.el: 232 of 236 tests successful ( 98%).
os-tests.el: 10 of 20 tests successful ( 50%).
regexp-tests.el: 350 of 350 tests successful (100%).
region-tests.el: 28 of 28 tests successful (100%).
symbol-tests.el: 246 of 246 tests successful (100%).
syntax-tests.el: 60 of 60 tests successful (100%).
tag-tests.el: 6 of 6 tests successful (100%).
weak-tests.el: 140 of 140 tests successful (100%).
Compilation finished at Fri Feb 25 01:40:52
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
Mistreatment of mode-popup-menu by easy-menu-remove (was: auctex LaTeX menu)
20 years, 1 month
Ralf Angeli
Ralf Angeli
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to comp.emacs.xemacs as well.
[Copying this to xemacs-beta. Context for people there: The following
description applies to toggling of math mode in AUCTeX.]
* Rick Baartman (2005-02-24) writes:
> One last little thing, not very important but nevertheless a bug:
> If I use the popup and then turn Math Mode on (C-c ~), the two entries
> expand to 3 as it should, but then if I toggle C-c ~ again, both the Math
> and the LaTeX menus disappear from the popup leaving only Command. I can
> get it back by toggling again, but as I said it now toggles only between 3
> entries and 1 entry.
It seems that this is a bug in `easy-menu-remove' which strips all
menus except the "Command" menu from `mode-popup-menu'. The following
change in easymenu.el should fix this:
--- easymenu.el 12 Apr 2001 20:21:17 +0200 1.5
+++ easymenu.el 24 Feb 2005 19:20:30 +0100
＠＠ -203,7 +203,7 ＠＠
"Remove MENU from the current menu bar."
(when (featurep 'menubar)
(setq easy-menu-all-popups (delq menu easy-menu-all-popups)
- mode-popup-menu (if (< (length easy-menu-all-popups) 1)
+ mode-popup-menu (if (> (length easy-menu-all-popups) 1)
(cons (easy-menu-title)
(reverse easy-menu-all-popups))
(let ((same-as-menu
The patch applies to HEAD of the release-21-4 branch. AFAICS 21.5
suffers from the same problem.
--
Ralf
- 1 participants
- 0 comments
How can I get a news xemacs with sjt-xft ?
20 years, 1 month
Francois Maltey
Francois Maltey
Hello !
In december 2004 I make a new xemacs
cvs -d :pserver:cvs＠cvs.xemacs.org:/pack/xemacscvs login
cvs -d :pserver:cvs＠cvs.xemacs.org:/pack/xemacscvs checkout -d xemacs-21.5-r \
sjt-xft xemacs
cd xemacs-21.5
./configure --with-xft=all --includedir=/usr/include/freetype2 --enable-emule
So I get a very pretty xemacs with antialiased fonts.
I configure my xresources so :
XEmacs.background: White
XEmacs*font: Bitstream Vera Sans:style=Roman:size=12
XEmacs*fontSet: Bitstream Vera Sans:style=Roman:size=12
XEmacs.bold-italic.attributeFont: Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:style=Bold Oblique:size=12
XEmacs.bold.attributeFont: Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:style=Bold:size=12
XEmacs.default.attributeFont: Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:style=Roman:size=12
XEmacs.italic.attributeFont: Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:style=Oblique:size=12
XEmacs.modeline*attributeFont: Bitstream Vera Sans:style=Roman:size=12
Now I use it every-day and I get some coredump with gnus.
So I want to compile a new xemacs.
I do :
cvs -d :pserver:cvs＠cvs.xemacs.org:/pack/xemacscvs login # passwd cvs
cvs -d :pserver:cvs＠cvs.xemacs.org:/pack/xemacscvs co -d xemacs-21.5
sjt-xft xemacs
And cvs complains "cannot find module sjt-xft"
What is the right cvs command ?
- 2 participants
- 1 comments
Wake up! 21.5.19 src/alloc.c: MALLOC_BEGIN bug.
20 years, 1 month
Andrey Slusar
Andrey Slusar
Hi,
src/alloc.c contains:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#ifdef ERROR_CHECK_MALLOC
[...]
#define MALLOC_BEGIN() \
do \
{ \
assert (!in_malloc); \
assert (!regex_malloc_disallowed); \
in_malloc = 1; \
} \
while (0)
[...]
#else /* ERROR_CHECK_MALLOC */
#define MALLOC_BEGIN(block)
[...]
#endif /* ERROR_CHECK_MALLOC */
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
When ERROR_CHECK_MALLOC defined, compiling is ok - MALLOC_BEGIN is
running whithout args in functions xmalloc() and xcalloc(). When is not
defined, XEmacs is not compiled.
This problem is reproduced, when XEmacs 21.5.19 build on the FreeBSD 4.x
systems.
2005-02-23 Andrey Slusar <anrays(a)gmail.com>
* alloc.c (MALLOC_BEGIN): MALLOC_BEGIN is not required args.
Index: src/alloc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /pack/xemacscvs/XEmacs/xemacs/src/alloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.106
diff -u -r1.106 alloc.c
--- src/alloc.c 2005/02/03 16:14:04 1.106
+++ src/alloc.c 2005/02/23 00:01:18
＠＠ -349,7 +349,7 ＠＠
#else /* ERROR_CHECK_MALLOC */
-#define MALLOC_BEGIN(block)
+#define MALLOC_BEGIN()
#define FREE_OR_REALLOC_BEGIN(block)
#define MALLOC_END()
--
Regards,
Andrey.
- 2 participants
- 1 comments
RE: [Bug: 21.5-b19] constrain-to-field is undefined (fill-paragraph-or-region fails)
20 years, 1 month
Philip Aston
Philip Aston
Thanks Jerry, will do.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry James [mailto:james＠xemacs.org]
> Sent: 23 February 2005 16:27
> To: Philip Aston
> Cc: XEmacs Beta
> Subject: Re: [Bug: 21.5-b19] constrain-to-field is undefined
> (fill-paragraph-or-region fails)
>
>
> "Philip Aston" <paston(a)bea.com> wrote:
> > paragraphs.el now uses an undefined function
> constrain-to-field. This
> > breaks several things, including the submission of bug reports and
> > fill-paragraph-or-region. b18 was fine, b19 is broken:
>
> Upgrade your xemacs-base package. The latest version
> contains field.el,
> from which constrain-to-field is autoloaded.
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~james/
>
- 1 participants
- 0 comments