September 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: alpha linux bug! 24 years, 11 months

Neal D. Becker

>>>>> "Kyle" == Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com> writes: Kyle> nbecker(a)fred.net writes: >> I previously reported that 21.2b19 would not work when compiled with >> any version of egcs I had on alpha-linux-gnu. >> >> I just tried 21.1.17. It worked fine! >> >> So, I've got good news and bad news. >> >> For a start, I think we need to fix all the warnings about an integer >> being cast to a pointer. Kyle> Ummm, how many warnings would this be? Didn't count, but quite a few - I'm thinking on the order of 20-30 maybe?

2 participants
1 comments

alpha linux bug! 24 years, 11 months

Neal D. Becker

I previously reported that 21.2b19 would not work when compiled with any version of egcs I had on alpha-linux-gnu. I just tried 21.1.17. It worked fine! So, I've got good news and bad news. For a start, I think we need to fix all the warnings about an integer being cast to a pointer.

2 participants
1 comments

Is there still lost traffic on xemacs-patches? 24 years, 11 months

Jim Horning

For sometime I have noticed that I do not get all the traffic on the xemacs-patches list. There were some messages a while back with regards to problems on xemacs-patches listserv and I had attributed it to that. Is this still the case? It's not to bad to go out to the web site an retrieve the missing ones, I don't rebuild that often, but it would be nicer to receive them all in the first place. Regards, Jim -- Senior Staff Engineer, Digital Design Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control P.O. Box 650003, M/S L14-01, Dallas, TX 75265-0003 (972)603-1560 mailto:jim.horning＠lmco.com

1 participants
0 comments

Re: xemacs-patches sending mails twice ?? 24 years, 11 months

Adrian Aichner

>>>>> "Stef" == Stef Epardaud <stef(a)lunatech.com> writes: Stef> hi, lately i've received mails from xemacs-patches twice in Stef> my mailbox, the first time correct, the second time with the Stef> headers as the body. can anyone tell wether it happens to Stef> others than me ? Stef, I see the same problem. Kyle, I see these strange mails coming in via domino01.lido-tech (pa48.gdansk.ppp.tpnet.pl [212.160.44.48]) and crystal.WonderWorks.COM. Do you know what's going on here? Could pa48.gdansk.ppp.tpnet.pl be the culprit? Regards, Adrian Here is all the header information for one of the patches I sent in: Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.8.5/8.7.1) with ESMTP id DAA10665 for <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 03:34:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from majordom＠localhost) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) id DAA11902 for xemacs-patches-out; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 03:25:29 -0400 Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.COM [192.203.206.1]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA11888 for <xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 03:25:22 -0400 Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM id QQhilh00307; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from domino01.lido-tech (pa48.gdansk.ppp.tpnet.pl [212.160.44.48]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id DAA11854 for <xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 03:25:09 -0400 Received: from gdnadm02.lido-tech ([192.168.32.165]) by domino01.lido-tech (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 412567F9.002E357A; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:24:43 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 03:25:09 -0400 From: aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com X-Gnus-Mail-Source: pop:aichner＠engine Message-Id: <199909270725.DAA11854(a)gwyn.tux.org> To: undisclosed-recipients:; Sender: owner-xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: <xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org> Content-Type: text X-Content-Length: 5566 Status: Content-Length: 5566 Lines: 150 Xref: ZJ75T ecf:889 -- Adrian Aichner Teradyne GmbH, European Design Center Integra Test Division Telephone +49/89/41861(0)-208 Dingolfinger Strasse 2 Fax +49/89/41861-217 (What is a Fax?) D-81673 MUENCHEN E-mail adrian.aichner(a)teradyne.com

1 participants
0 comments

Re: XEmacs 21.1.7 "Biscayne" Released 24 years, 11 months

john s jacobs anderson

>>>>> "SM" == Sean Murphy <murphys(a)Teltec.DCU.IE> writes: SM> Hi Vin (or whoever reads this), Great work on XEmacs. i think vin is away for a bit, so... SM> I had a look at the website, but it was not all obvious to me SM> how to find out what is in the changelogs. It seemed that I SM> had to download the entire distribution just to see what was SM> in the changelogs. Perhaps this is not the case. no, that's the case, and it's my fault. SM> In any case, I think it would be a good idea to put the SM> changelog on up on the website (if it's not there already) and SM> add a link in your mail. i'm working on it. 8^)= i grabbed the release announcement off my news feed, but am waiting until work today to get the NEWS and other files from the tarball (dialup connection vs. OCsomething) thanks for reminding me, however. john. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ John S Jacobs Anderson Apprentice Geek jacobs(a)azstarnet.com Journeyman Molecular Biologist <URL:http://www.azstarnet.com/~jacobs/> <- GeneHack:bioinfo*linux*opinion

1 participants
0 comments

Re: xemacs-patches sending mails twice ?? 24 years, 11 months

Didier Verna

Stef Epardaud <stef(a)lunatech.com> wrote: > hi, lately i've received mails from xemacs-patches twice in my mailbox, > the first time correct, the second time with the headers as the body. > can anyone tell wether it happens to others than me ? yes -- / / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/ - / / - / / /_/ / ENST, INFRES C201.1 mailto:verna＠inf.enst.fr /_/ / /_/ / /__ / 46 rue Barrault Tel. +33 (1) 45 81 73 46 75013 Paris, France Fax. +33 (1) 45 81 31 19

2 participants
1 comments

xemacs-patches sending mails twice ?? 24 years, 11 months

Stef Epardaud

hi, lately i've received mails from xemacs-patches twice in my mailbox, the first time correct, the second time with the headers as the body. can anyone tell wether it happens to others than me ? -- # Stef Epardaud, # There is no limit to the power of computing ... # Java Defeater # ... except men maybe ? # Earth # Lunatech Research, # Solar System # soon we will quit researching and start finding...

1 participants
0 comments

Re: crash 24 years, 11 months

Michael Harnois

On 27 Sep 1999 09:00:26 +0200, Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> said: > Which version is this? Is this before or after the change to > x_any_window_to_frame? What exactly did you do when this > happended This is the latest CVS. I was pulling on a scrollbar. -- Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA mharnois(a)willinet.net aa0bt(a)aa0bt.ampr.org A witty saying proves nothing. -- Voltaire

1 participants
0 comments

XEmacs 21.1.7 "Biscayne" Released 24 years, 11 months

Vin Shelton

XEmacs-21.1.7 "Biscayne" is available from ftp.xemacs.org. Get it from: ftp://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/xemacs/xemacs-21.1/xemacs-21.1.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/xemacs/xemacs-21.1/xemacs-21.1.7-elc.tar.gz ftp://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/xemacs/xemacs-21.1/xemacs-21.1.7-info.tar.gz A patch to upgrade from 21.1.6 is also available: ftp://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/xemacs/xemacs-21.1/xemacs-21.1.6-21.1.7.patch.gz [The patch tarball only includes patches from xemacs-21.1.6.tar.gz to xemacs-21.1.7.tar.gz; you will still need to retrieve the elc and info tarballs.] XEmacs-21.1 is the stable branch of XEmacs. As such, only bugfix submissions are allowed into these releases. This release fixes a large number of bugfixes; consultant the ChangeLogs for details. In addition, at the urging of Jan Vroonhof, I have copied xpm-button.el into the core lisp package. This will cause a lisp shadowing which can be safely ignored. The 21.1.x series of releases is being named for US National Parks. Biscayne is a National Park located in South Florida. For more information see: http://www.nps.gov:80/bisc/. Vin Shelton

2 participants
1 comments

Re: packages update messed up? 24 years, 11 months

Michael Sperber

>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Miller <jmiller(a)smart.net> writes: Jeff> 2 more questions. How long has that been the case (the .xemacs dir ) Jeff> to store package-index? Forever, with a slight jitter over the development period of 21.2. (It moved into ~/.xemacs/xemacs-packages and then back, I think.) Jeff> If I say "List and install" why doesn't it use the package-index Jeff> under $prefix/xemacs-$ver/etc ? It just starts downloading it from Jeff> xemacs.org. I guess cause it doesn't find one under ~/.xemacs? A bug, obviously. I'll look into it as soon as I can catch my breath. -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta September 1999