August 1998 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Neal D. Becker

Looks interesting. Any documentation?

1 participants
0 comments

SL Baur

Per Abrahamsen <abraham(a)dina.kvl.dk> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes: >> I see nothing wrong with `point-at-eol' and `point-at-bol'. > When Lars first suggested these functions, I asked why he didn't just > use the existing `eolp' and `bolp' functions. Thus, the names > confused _me_, no matter what the logic behind them is. Well, that's one of the reasons why I asked you to join the XEmacs beta list when I became XEmacs maintainer. I'm very sorry that you and Kyle came (back) in somewhat after things got moving again. Many of the mistakes I made in that period of time have since been corrected and the rest will get corrected post-21.0[1]. Footnotes: [1] Yes Hrvoje, that means all the things you've been beating on me about.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Seppuku and x_IO_error_handler() 27 years

SL Baur

Karl M Hegbloom <karlheg(a)inetarena.com> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > Since X won't be free anymore, This is a lie and fud. The Closed Group's version of X11 is no longer free, but XFree86 is committed to keeping a free version of X11.[1] I've been in contact with them on this issue and I have no reason to mistrust them. I think it's important that we back the XFree86 folks rather than run off and fork a whole new distribution. Footnotes: [1] http://sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk/XFree86/news/pr-980407.html

2 participants
1 comments

w09-toner 27 years

aa1250＠yahoo.com

BENCHMARK PRINT SUPPLY 1091 REDSTONE LANE ATLANTA GA 30338 CALL----> 770-399-0953 FOR TONER SUPPLIES ORDERS/PRICING ONLY CALL----> 770-399-5505 CUSTOMER SERVICE/SUPPORT ISSUES CALL----> 770-399-5614 E-MAIL REMOVAL COMPLAINTS LINE OR BY E-MAIL TO -----> http://remove-list.com OUR LASER PRINTER/FAX/COPIER TONER CARTRIDGE PRICES NOW AS LOW AS $39 & UP. SPECIALS WEEKLY ON ALL LASER PRINTER SUPPLIES. WE CARRY MOST ALL LASER PRINTER CARTRIDGES, FAX SUPPLIES AND COPIER TONERS AT WAREHOUSE PRICES INCLUDING: HEWLETT PACKARD SERIES 2/3/4/2P/4P/5P/4L/5L/3SI/4SI/5SI IBM/LEXMARK OPTRA SERIES 4019/4029/4039/4049/4059 EPSON SERIES 2/1100/1500/6000/7000/8000 NEC SERIES 90/95 CANON COPIER PC SERIES INCLUDING 3/6RE/7/11/320/720/10/20/25 ETC... HP FAX SERIES 700/720/5000/7000/FX1/FX2/FX3/FX4/FX5 CANON FAX ALL MODELS PRICES CHANGE WEEKLY PLEASE CALL TO GET THE MOST RECENT PRICING/AVAILABILTY AND SPECIALS OF THE WEEK!!!! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE MAKE NOTE OF THE FOLLOWING BEFORE YOU CALL: -----> WE DO NOT HAVE CATALOGS OR PRICE LISTS BECAUSE OUR PRICES CHANGE WEEKLY!! -----> WE DO NOT FAX QUOTES OR PRICES BECAUSE OUR ORDER LINE IS NOT SET UP TO DO THAT -----> WE DO NOT SELL TO RESELLERS OR BUY FROM DISTRIBUTERS -----> WE DO NOT CARRY : BROTHER -MINOLTA-KYOSERA- PANASONIC - XEROX - FUJITSU - OKIDATA - SHARP!! -----> WE DO NOT CARRY ANY COLOR PRINTER SUPPLIES!!!!! -----> WE DO NOT CARRY DESKJET/INKJET OR BUBBLEJET SUPPLIES!!!! NEW,NEW,NEW $10 MAIL IN REBATE ON SELECTED CARTRIDGES SIMPLY ORDER YOUR NEW CARTRIDGE, WHEN IT ARRIVES MAIL BACK YOUR REBATE CERTIFICATE WITH ANY USED CARTRIDGE FOR INSTANT CREDIT WE ACCEPT ALL MAJOR CREDIT CARDS OR COD ORDERS CORPORATE ACCOUNTS AVAILABLE WITH APPROVED CREDIT ALL PACKAGES SHIPPED UPS GROUND UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Seppuku and x_IO_error_handler() 27 years

Karl M. Hegbloom

>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: sb> Karl M Hegbloom <karlheg(a)inetarena.com> writes in sb> xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: >> Since X won't be free anymore, sb> This is a lie and fud. What does `fud' mean? sb> The Closed Group's version of X11 is no longer free, but sb> XFree86 is committed to keeping a free version of X11.[1] I've sb> been in contact with them on this issue and I have no reason sb> to mistrust them. sb> I think it's important that we back the XFree86 folks rather sb> than run off and fork a whole new distribution. I had it wrong then... It guess the fork has already happened, and the free side of the tree is in the XFree86 camp.

3 participants
2 comments

Re: point-at-{eol,bol} 27 years

Hrvoje Niksic

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi(a)gnus.org> writes: > Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes: > > > > Under Emacs, these newish functions are called `line-end-position' > > > and `line-beginning-position'. It would be nice it the same was the > > > case under XEmacs. > > > > Oh, so Stallman has ignored the existing XEmacs name once again. > > Yes. But I think these names are better names than the ones I > originally came up with -- point-at-{eol,bol}. This was my first thought too, but remember that we already have `point', `point-min', and `point-max'. I see nothing wrong with `point-at-eol' and `point-at-bol'. If we do change the name, then we also have to support the old names. Which sounds like needless work to me. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Oh lord won't you buy me a color TV...

2 participants
1 comments

Re: flyspell package? 27 years

SL Baur

Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > Perhaps someone could create an XEmacs 21.0 package for it? Been there done that.

2 participants
1 comments

Re: ~/.xemacs will not be package hierarchy root for long 27 years

Didier Verna

sperber(a)Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes: > > IMPORTANT NOTE: In a future version of XEmacs, the user-specific > > package hierarchy will move from ~/.xemacs to ~/.xemacs/packages. Good stuff to hear on a monday morning :-)

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Seppuku and x_IO_error_handler() 27 years

Gunnar Evermann

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > Mauro Condarelli <MC5686(a)mclink.it> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > ...[re supporting non-Linux Unix] > > If we;re going to take that stance we will have a lot less problems... > > and a lot less users. > > A year or so from now, if things keep going the way they have been, > nearly all of our users will be on either Linux or some flavor of > Microsoft Windows. Linux has been the most popular Unix to run XEmacs > on[1] since 19.14. I don't believe that's true. :-( > > This is not to say that I'm in favor of dropping portable Unix > support. I'm not. It's just not as important as it used to be. > > Footnotes: > [1] With regards to counts of downloads of binary kits from the FTP site. OK, but I think most 'commercial' Unices run on 'real' multiuser Systems or on larger clusters of workstations, while Linux for the most part just supports one user, i.e. you might be right in turns of the number installed versions but maybe not in terms of users. e.g. I think I downloaded two binary kits (for Solaris) and in both cases, the installed version was (is) used by somewhere between 50 and 100 users. BTW. I don't want to start a Linux vs. 'commercial' Unix flameware. I really like Linux, but most larger installations (universities or companies) use a 'commercial' Unix. Gunnar -- Gunnar Evermann Natural Language Systems Group, University of Hamburg EMail: Gunnar.Evermann(a)nats.informatik.uni-hamburg.de

1 participants
0 comments

Showstoppers for 21.0 (continued) 27 years

Ben Wing

I was hoping that people would step up and volunteer to be responsible for making sure that the various individual problem areas get fixed Real Soon Now. As always, comments are welcome. Ben (typed by Martin)

1 participants
0 comments

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta August 1998