>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Stephen> We all do value XEmacs, its history, the codebase, and you, our
Stephen> community. We are sad that XEmacs has fallen so far out of
Stephen> competition with GNU Emacs, but it's time to admit that is the case,
Stephen> and think about what we want to do now. Several alternative paths
Stephen> have been suggested:
I never thought of it being a competition (at least not for many, many
years).
Stephen> 1. Close up shop and release the resources to other projects.
What does that really mean, since XEmacs is open source?
Stephen> 2. Close up shop and move en masse to GNU Emacs development.
Stephen> 3. Fork current GNU Emacs, and gradually recreate an XEmacs-
Stephen> flavored GNU-Emacs-compatible language and editor.
Stephen> 4. Maintain infrastructure as a "caretaker" project, for the
Stephen> benefit of continuing users, and in case somebody wants to
Stephen> pick up the ball.
[snip]
Stephen> We would like to hear your thoughts. If you have private patches you
Stephen> can contribute to XEmacs 21.5, please let us know about them. They
Stephen> can be integrated. XEmacs 21.4 is very near end-of-life, but Vin
Stephen> Shelton is still maintaining it.
Stephen> We thank you for your support and contributions over the years!
And thank you and all of the contributors over the many years!
As a user from the original Lucid Emacs days, this is a rather sad
day. I have never switched to Emacs because there was never a reason
to. XEmacs always did everything I needed to do (fairly limited).
I blame myself for this state of affairs for not contributing
more. But like all of you, other things get in the way.
I don't have any suggestions on the way forward, but [3] seems like
not such a good idea.
Best wishes to all of you and many thanks for your hard work!
--
Ray
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Hi Steve
The situation you describe is no news to anyone involved in the XEmacs
project. The project has been in this very state for many years now
with small bursts of activity. Nothing more can be expected from
contributors putting their spare time into a project. Thank you all
for this.
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Several alternative paths have been suggested:
>
> 1. Close up shop and release the resources to other projects.
Which resources?
> 2. Close up shop and move en masse to GNU Emacs development.
Probably not. Those who considered that as an option left a long time
ago.
> 3. Fork current GNU Emacs, and gradually recreate an XEmacs-
> flavored GNU-Emacs-compatible language and editor.
Unrealistic, IMHO. The core features that differentiate XEmacs are
fundamental and developers would presumably have a lot of work ahead
of them recreating these in a fork.
> 4. Maintain infrastructure as a "caretaker" project, for the
> benefit of continuing users, and in case somebody wants to
> pick up the ball.
That'd be my personal preference. Basically just leave it the way it
is. Shout if you need help for keeping life-support going or to tell
us all to fork the repo in case it is taken down.
Perhaps someday a prince will come and kiss Sleeping Beauty.
Cheers
Marcus
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
>>> "Andrés" == Andrés Ramírez <sunshavi(a)fastmail.fm> writes:
> Regards
> ps: just for the record on my setup menu-bar, toolbar, scrollbar are
> disabled. On the screenshot I started emacs with "-Q"
emacs -q (scrollbar black)
emacs -Q (scrollbar grey-white)
So there is some bizarre system-init file somewhere which screws up the
scrollbar. Any idea where?
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
> Hi Uwe. My comments below.
> My version:
> extra/libxaw 1.0.13-1 [installed]
> X11 Athena Widget library
Ok mine is
1.0.7-1 which is a bit older.
> Nothing special for the scrollbar
> Btw, I have noticed in your screenshot even the toolbar is grayed. Are
> You using a theme on your destop environment?.
Well I am using TDE, trinity a KDE3 fork (Kubuntu)
> Or perhaps smth on
> "~/.Xdefaults"?
Yes I have .Xdefaults setting, but the same for Xemacs as for GNU emacs,
but only the GNU emacs scrollbar is black, here are my settings:
XEmacs.foreground: black
XEmacs.background: grey99
XEmacs.font: -*-courier-bold-r-*-*-18-180-*-*-*-*-*-*
XEmacs.geometry: 95x43+20+5
Emacs.foreground: black
Emacs.background: grey98
Emacs.font: -*-courier-bold-r-*-*-18-180-*-*-*-*-*-*
Emacs.geometry:105x63+20+5
> Regards
> ps: just for the record on my setup menu-bar, toolbar, scrollbar are
> disabled. On the screenshot I started emacs with "-Q"
Aha, when I do this for emacs, indeed the scrollbar is «normal» grey.
Now I am puzzled, what could that be?
BTW while with the option lucid, the menus/widget are very Xemacs like,
that menus itself, that is the font of them are not they are the same
small font-difficult-to-read entries as always.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
>>> "Andrés" == Andrés Ramírez <sunshavi(a)fastmail.fm> writes:
Hi Andrés
> Hi Uwe.
> This is my emacs-lucid-git configure script:
> ./configure \
> --prefix=/usr \
> --sysconfdir=/etc \
> --libexecdir=/usr/lib \
> --localstatedir=/var \
> --with-x-toolkit=lucid \
> --mandir=/usr/share/man \
> --pdfdir=/usr/share/doc/emacs/pdf \
> --with-sound \
> --without-gconf \
> --with-xft
> complete Pkgbuild here:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=emacs-lucid-git
That is odd as you can see from my screenshot the scrollbar is completely
black and therefore almost useless.
I will try to run
--with-x-toolkit=lucid
--without-gconf
--with-xft although I think the xft is per default.
Maybe my xaw3dg is too old?
Or to you have a setting for the scrollbar?
Thanks
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Andrés Ramírez writes:
> I have always thought why Lucid-x-toolkit is never updated?
Well, Lucid basically was out of business 20 years ago. The version
we have in XEmacs has been maintained and upgraded over the years (eg,
to add tabs, progress bars, and generic "native" widgets), and I am
sure it has diverged substantially from the version GNU Emacs uses. I
don't know how much they've improved their version but I know they
haven't added the additional widget support we have.
> How the Lucid-x-toolkit got on GNU/Emacs?
I don't know; maybe the record is in their repo history. The rest of
Lucid Emacs was FSF-assigned, but curiously enough, this is the only
part of Lucid Emacs that was not assigned to the FSF (it was used in
other parts of the Lucid Energize suite, so they wouldn't let it go, I
guess). Even more curiously, RMS let it in; I don't know who owns
those copyrights now. (Maybe Richard Gabriel? yes, Richard "Worse Is
Better" Gabriel.)
> Why there is no a 'prelude' (dot emacs distribution) equivalent or
> something like that, just for downloading Xemacs, another tarball and
> enjoy the full Xemacs experience quickly? (even downloading
> automatically some mule-packages from the web)
In 2000, the logic was, Windows, MSFT is no help and you gotta buy a
compiler, OK, we'll provide an installer. Otherwise, all the distros
have it in their packages. It doesn't get quicker than that. After
that, we lost manpower and become ever more dependent on the distros
though we still
> ps: that Lucid toolkit is a great piece of sw. It is still relevant
> on 2015. And is going to be as long as the gtk bug is not closed
> (not going to be closed on the near future)
Hard to believe it's 25 years old, isn't it? The only problem I have
with Lucid is that it's full of Lisp idioms ... but it's not part of
Emacs Lisp, it's a whole extra layer of API.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
>>> "Andrés" == Andrés Ramírez <sunshavi(a)fastmail.fm> writes:
> Hi There.
>> Aha, I did not know about it. I will try out. Does it looks closer to
>> Xemacs this way?
> See it by yourself. (taken from a vncviewer the only way of getting the
> menus on an screenshot)
strange, for me it seems the other way around. Could you send me your
configure options for GNU emacs please.
I configured GNU emacs
./configure --prefix=/opt/emacs25/ --with-x-toolkit=lucid
here is the screenshot
And I configured xemacs with
auto-apt run ./configure --with-mule --with-widgets --with-athena=3d
--with-xpm --with-xface --with-database=berkdb
--with-error-checking=none --with-debug=yes --with-xim=xlib
--with-xim=xlib --with-png --with-zlib --with-jpeg --with-gif
--with-tiff
Here is the screenshot.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
> Hi Guys. Mi comments below.
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:36:36 -0500,
> Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I use this GNU/Emacs version:
> GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw scroll bars) of
> 2015-04-21 on wari
> That is the Lucid version.
Aha, I did not know about it. I will try out. Does it looks closer to
Xemacs this way?
Uwe Brauer
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2015-11-24 - 2015-12-01)
XEmacs Issue Tracking System at http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
573 open ( +0) / 319 closed ( +0) / 892 total ( +0)
Open issues with patches: 13
Average duration of open issues: 2257 days.
Median duration of open issues: 2454 days.
Open Issues Breakdown
new 265 ( +0)
deferred 6 ( +0)
napping 3 ( +0)
verified 58 ( +0)
assigned 145 ( +0)
committed 19 ( +0)
documented 3 ( +0)
done/needs work 15 ( +0)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta