XEmacs Packages have been pre-released (2008-10-13-10)
16 years, 1 month
Norbert Koch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey there everyone.
I have just added the following packages to the 'Pre-Releases'
directory:
New Packages in Pre-Release:
===========================
prog-modes-2.17-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
Previously Announced Packages Still in Pre-Release:
==================================================
apel-1.33-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 10.6
auctex-1.50-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 11.84
calendar-1.38-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
cedet-common-1.01-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.0pre4
dired-1.19-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 7.16
easypg-1.02-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 0.0.16
ediff-1.75-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.75
edit-utils-2.40-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
edt-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
efs-1.34-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.24
eieio-1.06-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.0pre4
elib-1.13-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.0
erc-0.22-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: Version 5.1.2 Revision: 1.796.2.6
eshell-1.16-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 0fc80a3f6bb3bb59f42e9ff83cc8b89bf90fe658
eudc-1.40-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.32
fsf-compat-1.17-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
games-1.18-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.04
general-docs-1.05-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
gnus-1.93-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 5.10.8
guided-tour-0.52-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
hm--html-menus-1.24-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 5.9
hyperbole-1.17-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 5.0
igrep-1.16-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.111
latin-euro-standards-1.08-pkg.ta upstream version: 1.08
leim-1.27-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
locale-1.28-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
mail-lib-1.80-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
mh-e-1.31-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 7.4.2
mule-base-1.53-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
mule-ucs-1.17-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 0.84
net-utils-1.56-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: N/A
oo-browser-1.05-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 4.08
os-utils-1.41-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
pcl-cvs-1.68-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: R-2_9_9
pcomplete-1.05-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.1.6
perl-modes-1.14-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
ps-print-1.12-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 6.5.6
psgml-1.45-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.3.2
python-modes-1.10-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 426
scheme-1.17-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
sh-script-1.24-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.0f
skk-1.24-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 10.62a
speedbar-1.29-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 1.0pre4
text-modes-1.95-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
tm-1.39-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
tramp-1.40-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 2.0.56
vc-1.45-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
viper-1.63-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 3.09
vm-8.07-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 8.0.12-devo
w3-1.35-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 4.0pre47
x-symbol-1.11-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: 4.5.1
xemacs-base-2.18-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
xemacs-devel-1.78-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: none
xetla-1.02-pkg.tar.gz upstream version: steve(a)eicq.org--2005/xetla--main--1.1--version-0
Detailed Changes:
================
- ------- ChangeLog Entries from xemacs-packages/prog-modes/ChangeLog -------
2008-10-13 Norbert Koch <viteno(a)xemacs.org>
* Makefile (VERSION): XEmacs package 2.17 released.
2008-10-10 Ville Skyttä <scop(a)xemacs.org>
* rpm-spec-mode.el (rpm-increase-release-with-macros): Anchor
another tag search regexp at beginning of line, drop unneeded concat.
(rpm-spec-mode-version): Set to 0.12.2x.
2008-10-10 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com>
* rpm-spec-mode.el (rpm-spec-field-value): Tags must start at
beginning of line, anchor search regexp there.
Installing These:
================
Manually:
- --------
1) Download the packages that you want to install from:
/ftp.xemacs.org:/pub/xemacs/beta/experimental/packages/
2) Unpack them to: [1]
/usr/local/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages/
3) Re-start XEmacs.
Using XEmacs Package Tools (XEmacs 21.[245].x):
- ----------------------------------------------
1) Tools -> Packages -> Add Download Site -> Pre-Releases
2) Tools -> Packages -> List and Install
3) Select the packages you wish to install (there are brief
instructions at the bottom of the packages buffer).
4) Packages -> Install/Remove Selected
5) Re-start XEmacs.
Using XEmacs Package Tools (XEmacs 21.1.14):
- -------------------------------------------
1) Options -> Manage Packages -> Add Download Site -> Pre-Releases
2) Options -> Manage Packages -> List and Install
3 - 5) As per XEmacs 21.[245].x.
norbert - XEmacs Package Release Manager.
Footnotes:
[1] Note: Mule packages should be installed into:
/usr/local/lib/xemacs/mule-packages/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFI8wplgu3ywdHdhM0RAp10AJ93eultT7tKv8zSWMLllpwmCTV+WQCg2UOu
X3TSc8M2tbyUtZhT6mkQYYQ=
=TrYN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Re: Trying the HEAD (or TIP or whatever)
16 years, 1 month
Sean MacLennan
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:57:48 -0400
"David A. Cobb" <superbiskit(a)cox.net> wrote:
> Built successfully as previously reported.
>
> The as-built version is fatally crippled without some packages.
>
> Trying Tools>Packages>List_and_Install
> gets me "symbols definition is void 'allow-remote-paths'"
>
> So I did (setq allow-remote-paths t) and tried again.
> And CRASH!
Try (setq allow-remote-paths nil)
I believe you need efs installed for allow-remote-paths to work.
Cheers,
Sean
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Re: Trying the HEAD (or TIP or whatever)
16 years, 1 month
Rodney Sparapani
David A. Cobb wrote:
> Built successfully as previously reported.
>
> The as-built version is fatally crippled without some packages.
>
> Trying Tools>Packages>List_and_Install
> gets me "symbols definition is void 'allow-remote-paths'"
>
> So I did (setq allow-remote-paths t) and tried again.
> And CRASH!
>
> Attachments:
> (1) ls -lR of /usr/local/iib/xemacs to show that I manually downloaded a
> few critical packages, and it didn't help.
I think it is supposed to be /usr/local/share now.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Re: [issue] XEmacs often crashes when "VI emulation" is activated. (RHEL4)
16 years, 1 month
Daniel Novotny
----- "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> Daniel Novotny writes:
> > > If it's a compiler issue, it may have to do with misuse of
> register
> > > variables. You could try compiling without the register
> declaration.
> >
> > Interesting, when I comment out the register declaration specifier
> > on all the variables, I am getting another error elsewhere in the
> code:
> > 100% reproducible the same thing again, a segfault
> > I attach the "where" backtrace in this mail
>
> That backtrace is partial, and just shows XEmacs trying to print out
> an error it encountered inside the error handler. This is hard to
> avoid since XEmacs is known to be in a bad state when it hits an
> internal error (AKA "impossible" condition).
>
> We need to see the whole backtrace.
OK, I didn't realize that, attaching the whole backtrace
Daniel Novotny
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Trying to build from source on Ubuntu 8.04 Linux
16 years, 1 month
Stephen J. Turnbull
BTW, sending to xemacs-buildreports is likely to get you ignored;
moving to xemacs-beta.
David A. Cobb writes:
> However, sad to say, the build ends with some undefined symbols in
> a GTK+ routine.
Actually, those are just null macros. It was careless coding practice
to use #if instead of #ifdef, but it shouldn't be a problem.
The real problem is that the code hasn't been updated in quite a
while, and GCC has gotten pickier in the meantime. You could update
to current Mercurial head, or for now try applying this patch:
diff -r 1af222c75869 src/glyphs-gtk.c
--- a/src/glyphs-gtk.c Mon May 21 05:02:43 2007 +0000
+++ b/src/glyphs-gtk.c Wed Oct 01 01:47:14 2008 +0900
＠＠ -796,7 +796,7 ＠＠
find_keyword_in_vector (instantiator, Q_file);
IMAGE_INSTANCE_GTK_PIXMAP (ii) = pixmap;
- IMAGE_INSTANCE_GTK_MASK (ii) = 0;
+ IMAGE_INSTANCE_PIXMAP_MASK (ii) = 0;
IMAGE_INSTANCE_PIXMAP_WIDTH (ii) = gdk_image->width;
IMAGE_INSTANCE_PIXMAP_HEIGHT (ii) = gdk_image->height;
IMAGE_INSTANCE_PIXMAP_DEPTH (ii) = gdk_image->depth;
＠＠ -1614,7 +1614,7 ＠＠
alist = Fcons (Fcons (Q_hotspot_y, make_int (yhot)),
alist);
- alist = xbm_mask_file_munging (alist, filename, Qnil, console_type);
+ alist = xbm_mask_file_munging (alist, filename, Qt, console_type);
{
Lisp_Object result = alist_to_tagged_vector (Qxbm, alist);
＠＠ -2972,7 +2972,7 ＠＠
IMAGE_INSTANCE_TYPE (p) = IMAGE_COLOR_PIXMAP;
/* Make sure there aren't two pointers to the same mask, causing
it to get freed twice. */
- IMAGE_INSTANCE_GTK_MASK (p) = 0;
+ IMAGE_INSTANCE_PIXMAP_MASK (p) = 0;
break;
default:
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
FAQ Q5.0.7: How can I use antialiased fonts under X11?
16 years, 1 month
Vladimir G. Ivanovic
A recent change to the XEmacs FAQ recommends setting the menubar font
when using XFT thusly:
#define MONO Mono
#define SANS Sans
#define PTSIZEM 12
#define PTSIZES 11
...
XEmacs.menubar.font: SANS:size=PTSIZES
This has no discernible effect as far as I can tell, but
XEmacs*xftFont: SANS:size=PTSIZES
does change the menubar font.
I configured XEmacs as suggested (./configure --enable-mule
--with-xft=emacs,menubars) and ran it with -vanilla.
Has anyone else gotten 'XEmacs.menubar.font' to work? If so, under
what conditions?
BTW, does anyone else feel as I do that the recommendation *in this
example* of using #defines obscures rather than clarifies what's going
on? I see no point in #defining Mono to be MONO (it's harder to read
uppercase) and the difference between PTSIZEM and PTSIZES is one
character (again in uppercase) out of seven. Since either 'M-x
replace-string' or 'M-x query-replace' work well, I don't see the need
to avoid "boring hand substitution", especially at the expense of
legibility. (Also note that "~.Xresources" should be "~/.Xresources".)
--- Vladimir
Linux 2.6.25-gentoo-r8 #3 PREEMPT x86_64
GNOME 2.22.3
FreeType 2.3.7
xfs 1.0.8
xorg-server 1.5.0
--
Vladimir G. Ivanovic
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Re: What is with this error message?
16 years, 1 month
Wei Weng
It's me FKtPp ;) wrote:
> sorry, but we've switched to Mercurial.
>
> Please refer to: http://www.xemacs.org/Develop/hgaccess.html
>
> BTW, it's very difficult to find a direct link to this page.. Should
> web pages be updated?
>
> Thanks,
> FKtPp
>
Ok, I just installed Mercurial (well, not *just*, last night actually:), and I
used this to check out:
hg clone http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs-beta
And the same configure parameters to configure, I still got this error message:
gui-x.o: In function `popup_selection_callback':
/home/wweng/Projects/xemacs-beta/src/gui-x.c:310: undefined reference to
`x_focus_timestamp_really_sucks_fix_me_better'
menubar-x.o: In function `pre_activate_callback':
/home/wweng/Projects/xemacs-beta/src/menubar-x.c:515: undefined reference to
`x_focus_timestamp_really_sucks_fix_me_better'
Oh I "cvs co"ed the source into xemacs-21.5 directory and "hg clone"ed source
into xemacs-beta directory, so I can avoid the mistake that somehow I rebuilt
the source from CVS, not from Mercurial.
Thanks
Wei
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Opening /very/ big files
16 years, 1 month
Didier Verna
Hi there,
somebody recently asked me if it was possible to have XEmacs only load
parts of files in buffers instead of loading the whole files. They have
files that can grow up to 1Go or more, which fills up their memory.
I don't think that's possible, but the idea (I guess) would be to have
some sort of a window on the file that moves around as the user
navigates in the file.
Any ideas or alternate solutions about this ?
--
Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.
Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com
EPITA/LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
Tel. +33 (0)1 44 08 01 85 Fax. +33 (0)1 53 14 59 22
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta