>>>>> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes:
>>>>> "Vin" == Vin Shelton <acs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Vin> In 21.1.10 on Linux x86, both methods 1 and 2 work as
Vin> advertised for different buffers in the same window.
APA> Thanks, Vin!
Vin> - vin
>>>>> On 10 Jun 2000, Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> said:
APA> Hello All!
APA> I have become an enthusiastic fan of
APA> C-button1 mouse-track-insert
APA> recently.
APA> 1.
APA> I pick the point where I want to insert something, hold down the Ctrl
APA> key, and drag thru the selection I want to insert.
APA> 2.
APA> As an alternative, double clicking on the word I want to insert (while
APA> holding Ctrl pressed) will also insert at the point current when Ctrl
APA> was pressed.
APA> The little gripe I have is this.
APA> Method 1 works even when picking a selection in another buffer, method
APA> 2 does not, in my native NT builds of XEmacs-21.1.10-close-to-11 and
APA> XEmacs-21.2-b34-with-latest-CVS-changes.
APA> Could somebody please let me know whether method 2 works under X (UNIX
APA> or even cygwin builds on Windows NT) with the selection being made in
APA> another buffer?
APA> Does anyone even have an explanation/workaround/solution?
I was wrong here:
APA> Turns out mswindows implements this in mouse.el, while x used
APA> x-mouse.el.
mouse has the code in question and is dumped for x and mswindows.
msw-mouse and x-mouse seem unrelated to these problems.
APA> I can't find a solution for this problem, but here is the symptom:
APA> When doing a mouse-track-insert from another buffer using double-click
APA> the default
APA> 'default-mouse-track-click-hook
APA> gets called under mswindows instead of the desired
APA> 'mouse-track-insert-click-hook
Why is this not a problem under X windows?
APA> Adrian
APA> Best regards,
APA> Adrian