February 2000 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Re: widget and tabs fix 24 years, 9 months

Jake Colman

>>>>> "kkm" == Kirill 'Big K' Katsnelson <kkm(a)dtmx.com> writes: kkm> A question. I have fixed all errors and warnings which C++ compiler kkm> gave, except for conversion errors between char* and unsigned kkm> char*. This is an error in C++: kkm> unsigned char str[20]; strset (str, 'z', 19); kkm> I do not really want to use casts at such places - they certainly do kkm> not improve on readability of the code. Any luck avoiding these? Most compiler have a compile-time option to suppress this warning. -- Jake Colman Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 946-0300 Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320 902 Plaza II Beeper: (800) 928-4640 Jersey City, NJ 07311 E-mail: colman(a)ppllc.com E-mail: jcolman(a)jnc.com web: http://www.ppllc.com microsoft: "where do you want to go today?" linux: "where do you want to go tomorrow?" BSD: "are you guys coming, or what?"

1 participants
0 comments

Re: widget and tabs fix 24 years, 9 months

Karl Kleinpaste

Jens Lautenbacher <jtl(a)schlund.de> writes: > Has this ever worked for _anyone_ under X? Yes, tabs under .28 are properly black-on-wheat for me, as set by customize.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: widget and tabs fix 24 years, 9 months

Jens Lautenbacher

Karl Kleinpaste <karl(a)justresearch.com> writes: > Very nice, and almost there; many thanx. Unfortunately, the > customization of the tab face still doesn't take, as seen in the MIMEd > .gif below. Has this ever worked for _anyone_ under X? it certainly didn't work for me, but I was under the impression that I made a mistake or that it would be a well known bug, so I never got around to report it :-( jtl

1 participants
0 comments

21.2.29 build failure with canna 24 years, 9 months

Yoshiki Hayashi

There's some report at xemacs-beta-ja that XEmacs 21.2.29 can't build with --with-canna option. Typical error is like this: EMACSBOOTSTRAPLOADPATH="/export/home2/syrinx/can/work/Emacs/Xemacs/21.2/xemacs.can/src/../lisp/:/export/home2/syrinx/can/work/Emacs/Xemacs/21.2/xemacs.can" EMACSBOOTSTRAPMODULEPATH="/export/home2/syrinx/can/work/Emacs/Xemacs/21.2/xemacs.can/src/../modules/:/export/home2/syrinx/can/work/Emacs/Xemacs/21.2/xemacs.can" ./temacs -batch -l /export/home2/syrinx/can/work/Emacs/Xemacs/21.2/xemacs.can/src/../lisp/update-elc.el Fatal error: assertion failed, file alloc.c, line 2495, abort() *** Error code 134 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `update-elc.stamp' Current working directory /export/home2/syrinx/can/work/Emacs/Xemacs/21.2/xemacs.can/src *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `src' He said he can compile XEmacs using --with-canna=no. Abort occurs at: void dumpopaque (void *varaddress, size_t size) { if (dumpopaqueidx >= countof (dumpopaquevec)) abort (); With below change, now DEFVAR_INT and stuff is stored at dumpopaquevec, which size is 200. 2000-02-10 Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> * symeval.h (struct symbol_value_magic): Remove "next" kludge and use a value field instead. (symbol_value_forward_forward): Use value field. (DEFVAR_SYMVAL_FWD): Use value field. (DEFVAR_SYMVAL_FWD_INT): Added. Dumps the int with dumpopaque. [...] I grepped the source code: grep '^[ \t]*DEFVAR_$INT\|CONST_INT\|BOOL\|CONST_BOOL\|LISP_MAGIC\|INT_MAGIC\|BOOL_MAGIC$' *.c | wc -l 234 grep '^[ \t]*DEFVAR_$INT\|CONST_INT\|BOOL\|CONST_BOOL\|LISP_MAGIC\|INT_MAGIC\|BOOL_MAGIC$' mule-canna.c | wc -l 130 Wow! More than half comes from mule-canna.c. It's possible some of them are #ifdef'ed out, but there's 234 entry which might be in dumpopaquevec. And no wander why people not using canna, includes myself, saw no problem. Now I know the problem, but I don't know that code enough to provide a fix. Olivier? -- Yoshiki Hayashi

1 participants
0 comments

Re: tab breakage yet again (XEmacs 21.2.29 is released.) 24 years, 9 months

Jens Lautenbacher

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)iskon.hr> writes: > Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: > > > Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)iskon.hr> writes: > > > > > If you look at the code, you'll see that it's not *that* hard to > > > support the three widget sets. They all use the Xt framework, so > > > stuff like XtNextEvent, XtAddInput, etc. work on all without > > > modification. > > > > The problem is that they all have subtly different bugs... > > And so has Gtk. I've hacked Gtk, and it's no bed of roses, in fact > it's buggy as hell, and about as inefficient. The story of Gtk being > "fast and lean" belong to 1990's. Ugh oh... gtk is for sure not any longer "fast and lean"... it's still fast enough, though. And for the bugs: Gtk is besides Motif/lesstif (and QT, which isn't considered here) the only of the used widget libs that has proven to be able to deliver big, nice looking and working GUI applications. It's the only one that is in active development AND bugfixing mode (this is sure right for lesstif, too, but they strive for emulation, which limits the way it can be changed) I don't see any big Xaw apps being made any longer. GTK is simply _supported_. Neither do I see anything using the lucid widget set (for obvious reasons) jtl

1 participants
0 comments

Re: tab breakage yet again (XEmacs 21.2.29 is released.) 24 years, 9 months

Hrvoje Niksic

Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes: > Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)iskon.hr> writes: > > > If you look at the code, you'll see that it's not *that* hard to > > support the three widget sets. They all use the Xt framework, so > > stuff like XtNextEvent, XtAddInput, etc. work on all without > > modification. > > The problem is that they all have subtly different bugs... And so has Gtk. I've hacked Gtk, and it's no bed of roses, in fact it's buggy as hell, and about as inefficient. The story of Gtk being "fast and lean" belong to 1990's.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: XEmacs 21.2.29 is released. 24 years, 9 months

Michael Harnois

And how does a poor soul like me get it to build? EMACSBOOTSTRAPLOADPATH="/usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/../lisp/:/usr/src/xemacs-build" EMACSBOOTSTRAPMODULEPATH="/usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/../modules/:/usr/src/xemacs-build" ./temacs -batch -l /usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/../lisp/update-elc.el Fatal error: assertion failed, file /usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/alloc.c, line 2495, abort() make[1]: *** [dump-elcs] Aborted make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/xemacs-build/src' cd ./src && make all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/xemacs-build/src' EMACSBOOTSTRAPLOADPATH="/usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/../lisp/:/usr/src/xemacs-build" EMACSBOOTSTRAPMODULEPATH="/usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/../modules/:/usr/src/xemacs-build" ./temacs -batch -l /usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/../lisp/update-elc.el Fatal error: assertion failed, file /usr/src/xemacs-21.2/src/alloc.c, line 2495, abort() make[1]: *** [update-elc.stamp] Aborted make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/xemacs-build/src' make: *** [src] Error 2 -- Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA mdharnois(a)home.com aa0bt(a)aa0bt.ampr.org If God lived on Earth, people would knock out all His windows. -- Yiddish saying

1 participants
0 comments

Installing 21.2.x in parallel with 21.1.x 24 years, 9 months

Jake Colman

I built and installed 21.1.x from sources and installed it off of my home directory (prefix=$HOME). I also installed all the packages in the default locations relative to my home directory. I'd like to download the latest beta release from the CVS server and install it (and it's associated packages) such that it will not conflict with my 21.1.x installation. How can I do this? I did read the web pages at cvs.xemacs.org but I'm not sure how I can follow these instructions and keep the two installation safely in parallel. TIA! -- Jake Colman Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 946-0300 Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320 902 Plaza II Beeper: (800) 928-4640 Jersey City, NJ 07311 E-mail: colman(a)ppllc.com E-mail: jcolman(a)jnc.com web: http://www.ppllc.com microsoft: "where do you want to go today?" linux: "where do you want to go tomorrow?" BSD: "are you guys coming, or what?"

1 participants
0 comments

Re: tab breakage yet again (XEmacs 21.2.29 is released.) 24 years, 9 months

Raymond Toy

>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes: Stephen> I'm working on something similar to this. I use VM, and Stephen> the standard buffer-tab filter selects up to 6 buffers Stephen> with the sme mode. But for each folder VM has up to Stephen> three buffers (the folder buffer itself, a Summary Stephen> buffer, and possibly a Presentation buffer). What I need Stephen> to do is (1) filter the extraneous buffers out (done) and Stephen> (2) arrange that the tab callback sets up the right Stephen> configuration in the frame. Can you post or mail me the filter stuff? I'd really like to see just the summary buffers on the tabs in my VM frame. Thanks, Ray

1 participants
0 comments

Re: tab breakage yet again (XEmacs 21.2.29 is released.) 24 years, 9 months

Jan Vroonhof

Hamish Macdonald <hamishm(a)lucent.com> writes: > Presumably c) is not a show-stopper if those who want gtk don't *care* > about multiple display support, I personally want both :-) > and gtk is just another windowing > alternative. Yes. But then the number of toolkits has just increased by one. It would be much nicer if you could (at least eventually) drop support for the rest. Jan

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta February 2000