March 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Cannot delete multiple packages via pui-list-packages 25 years, 9 months

Adrian Aichner

In the *Packages* buffer I select a few packages to get rid of with d. Then I execute with x. d runs `pui-toggle-package-delete-key' x runs `pui-install-selected-packages' After the first package gets de-installed by `package-admin-delete-binary-package' I get thrown to 'done because the function returns nil. part of pui-install-selected-packages': (when (catch 'done (mapcar (lambda (pkg) (if (not (package-admin-delete-binary-package pkg (package-admin-get-install-dir pkg nil))) ----------------------------------> (throw 'done nil))) pui-deleted-packages) t) (message "Packages deleted") ) This is because the last form in `package-admin-delete-binary-package', calling `package-delete-name' returns nil always! ;; Delete the package from the database of installed packages. (package-delete-name package))) What to do? Jan? Adrian -- Adrian Aichner Teradyne GmbH, European Design Center Integra Test Division Telephone +49/89/41861(0)-208 Dingolfinger Strasse 2 Fax +49/89/41861-217 (What is a Fax?) D-81673 MUENCHEN E-mail adrian.aichner(a)teradyne.com

1 participants
0 comments

Re: run-in-place needs support 25 years, 9 months

Neal D. Becker

>>>>> "SL" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: SL> nbecker <nbecker(a)fred.net> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: >> You can simply run-in-place. The problem is, to complete the job we >> need a new target: SL> ... >> Otherwise you won't have utils like gnuclient on your path. SL> We were discussing this earlier. I think XEmacs *should* add this SL> stuff to the run-time path. SL> I'm not sure what the point of a install target for run-in-place is. SL> It's my normal mode of operation and I typically keep the built trees SL> in fixed locations so I can add them to my WM menus. You run-in-place because you're just building/installing on one machine, so make install is pointless. Now you want to use it. So you symlink /usr/local/bin/xemacs -> ..../src/xemacs. That's fine, but what about gnuclient, etags, etc? Seems to me it makes perfect sense that you want symlinks for them too. Is run-in-place supposed to be useful? If so, should gnuclient work? If so you either have symlinks or else add lots of strange stuff to your path. I think most people (or at least many) would prefer the symlinks.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: (image-mode.el) Symbol's function definition is void: exec-installed-p 25 years, 9 months

Jan Vroonhof

Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.org> writes: > But it also means that dependant packages also get pulled in. This is bad > if the dependencies are for features that you never use. If this is really a problem I think one should use requires that are not at toplevel. Most of the time I think this causes more trouble then it is worth. See for instance infamous the defvar inside let problem that props up occasionanly. Jan

2 participants
1 comments

Re: failed compilation of xemacs-21.2.11 25 years, 9 months

Enrico Scholz

Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes: > [...] > Enrico, > > I don't have makeinfo available for my Windows NT native build of > XEmacs. > > What I do is this: > > I let XEmacs build the info files from the texi sources, which takes > about 4 minutes for me. > You need to have the texinfo package installed for that. This is > what I have installed: > > texinfo 1.14 XEmacs TeXinfo support. > > Just load the attached build-info.el and then use > M-x makeinfo-xemacs > [...] At work I am using the NT build too and have missed the info files a long while. Then I have copied the unix files, but this way is a little bit circumstantially. That's why I think a note about the possibilities to build info-files or perhaps your script would be very welcome in the README's of the NT build. (Because I am not sure if the NT developers are reading this mailinglist (xemacs-beta) I will send a CC to their mailinglist too) Enrico -- eMail: enrico.scholz(a)wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de talk: ensc(a)ultra.csn.tu-chemnitz.de

1 participants
0 comments

Patch for Solaris 'cc' 25 years, 9 months

Amir J. Katz

As I reported earlier today, building on Solaris 2.5 with Sun's SPARCWorks compiler went OK, except for the linking stage of temacs. I checked the mailing list archives and saw that someone else had already encountered the same problem and had devised the same ugly workaround (manually fixing the Makefile). Since it's no longer an isolated incident[1], I decided to hack a patch for this. The following patch works in my environment[2], but may be incorrect in other combinations of Solaris version and compiler versions. FIF[3] Amir. *** configure.orig Thu Mar 4 11:09:36 1999 --- configure Thu Mar 4 11:12:32 1999 *************** *** 12445,12454 **** ld_dynamic_link_flags= ;; ! sco3.2v5* | unixware* | sysv5* | sysv4* | solaris2* | solaris7*) ld_dynamic_link_flags="${wl}-Bexport" ;; sunos4*) ld_dynamic_link_flags= ;; --- 12445,12458 ---- ld_dynamic_link_flags= ;; ! sco3.2v5* | unixware* | sysv5* | sysv4*) ld_dynamic_link_flags="${wl}-Bexport" ;; + solaris2* | solaris7*) + ld_dynamic_link_flags="${wl}-Bdynamic" + ;; + sunos4*) ld_dynamic_link_flags= ;; Footnotes: ========== [1] "Once is an happenstance; twice is a coincidence; three times is a declaration of war" <source unknown> [2] uname -a;cc -V;gmake -v: SunOS picard 5.5 Generic_103093-23 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-10 cc: SC4.0 18 Oct 1995 C 4.0 GNU Make version 3.77 [3] Forewarned Is Forearmed --

1 participants
0 comments

Re: (image-mode.el) Symbol's function definition is void: exec-installed-p 25 years, 9 months

Jan Vroonhof

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > What do you consider fair use of autoloads and what do you consider > misuse? I don't have strong opinions either way on this. One could > argue that autoloads are only for the user, ie. for convenience in > building a .emacs and having M-x some-unloaded-function Do The Right > Thing. I think I am currently in the "only for users camp". lisp authors should be required to make the dependencies explicit as they can be expected to know more. It surely makes it easier to track for somebody else reading the code. What currently also bothers me (independent of this) is that using auto-load looses information. For instance add-minor-mode uses an commandp call on the toggle funtion. However that does not work if that function is just an autoload stub. Jan

3 participants
2 comments

loadable modules 25 years, 9 months

Giacomo Boffi

i was not able to load the sample module 'sample' in XEmacs 21.2 "Calliope" [Lucid] (i586-pc-linux) of Wed Mar 3 1999 here it is a mockup of my session: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % cd ~/src/xemacs-21.2/modules/sample % make ../../lib-src/ellcc -I. -I../../src -c sample.c ELLMAKEDOC=../../lib-src/make-docfile ../../lib-src/ellcc \ --mode=init --mod-output=sample_i.c \ --mod-name=sample --mod-version=1.0.0 \ --mod-title="Sample loadable module" sample.c ../../lib-src/ellcc -I. -I../../src -c sample_i.c ../../lib-src/ellcc --mode=link --mod-output=sample.ell sample.o sample_i.o % cd % xemacs -vanilla M-x load-module <RET> ~/src/xemacs-21.2/modules/sample/sample.ell <RET> Opening dynamic module: ~/src/xemacs-21.2.11/modules/sample/sample.ell: undefined symbol: Qt %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Qt is what the sample function returns previously, i had similar problems with module 'base64'

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Fix for double font-locking reverted buffers 25 years, 9 months

Jan Vroonhof

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > +;; sb 1999-03-03 -- The above comment no longer appears to be operative as > +;; the first call to normal-mode *will* restore the font-lock state and > +;; this call forces a second font-locking to occur when reverting a buffer, > +;; which is wasteful at best. Are you sure it will restore the font-lock state or is just that the normal find-file hooks us the normal mechanism to turn it on? i.e. what happens when I am editing in a major mode that is normally _not_ font-lock-ed an I do M-x turn-on-font-lock RET M-x revert-buffer RET Is the result a font-locked buffer? Jan

1 participants
0 comments

Re: failed compilation of xemacs-21.2.11 25 years, 9 months

SL Baur

Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz(a)wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com> writes: ... >> But we should definitely fix the manuals so that makeinfo shuts >> up, because there will be no peace in the valley until we do. >> > Yes, fixing wasn't very difficulty. I've attached a patch which should > solve the problem. Works for me. I've applied this patch to 21.0 and 21.2, thanks.

1 participants
0 comments

Friday's betas are on schedule 25 years, 9 months

SL Baur

and should be uploaded in the afternoon JST (+0900). A Sumo[1] update will be made some time earlier. Lisp package updates currently consist of reftex-1.12 [*] Reftex.el-3.43 c-support-1.12 [*] Fix autoload lossage w3-1.13[*] Fix steve build lossage ediff & viper Updates from Michael Kifer [*] Already uploaded to the FTP area. Footnotes: [1] I have been informed that the next Sumo tournament begins on the 14th. Get your VCRs ready. :-)

1 participants
0 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta March 1999