March 1999 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

Cannot delete multiple packages via pui-list-packages 26 years, 1 month

Adrian Aichner

In the *Packages* buffer I select a few packages to get rid of with d. Then I execute with x. d runs `pui-toggle-package-delete-key' x runs `pui-install-selected-packages' After the first package gets de-installed by `package-admin-delete-binary-package' I get thrown to 'done because the function returns nil. part of pui-install-selected-packages': (when (catch 'done (mapcar (lambda (pkg) (if (not (package-admin-delete-binary-package pkg (package-admin-get-install-… [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Re: run-in-place needs support 26 years, 1 month

Neal D. Becker

>>>>> "SL" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: SL> nbecker <nbecker(a)fred.net> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: >> You can simply run-in-place. The problem is, to complete the job we >> need a new target: SL> ... >> Otherwise you won't have utils like gnuclient on your path. SL> We were discussing this earlier. I think XEmacs *should* add this SL> stuff to the run-time path. SL> I'm not … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Re: (image-mode.el) Symbol's function definition is void: exec-installed-p 26 years, 1 month

Jan Vroonhof

Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.org> writes: > But it also means that dependant packages also get pulled in. This is bad > if the dependencies are for features that you never use. If this is really a problem I think one should use requires that are not at toplevel. Most of the time I think this causes more trouble then it is worth. See for instance infamous the defvar inside let problem that props up occasionanly. Jan

2 participants
1 comments

Re: failed compilation of xemacs-21.2.11 26 years, 1 month

Enrico Scholz

Adrian Aichner <aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes: > [...] > Enrico, > > I don't have makeinfo available for my Windows NT native build of > XEmacs. > > What I do is this: > > I let XEmacs build the info files from the texi sources, which takes > about 4 minutes for me. > You need to have the texinfo package installed for that. This is > what I have installed: > > texinfo 1.14 XEmacs TeXinfo support. > > Just load the attached … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Patch for Solaris 'cc' 26 years, 1 month

Amir J. Katz

As I reported earlier today, building on Solaris 2.5 with Sun's SPARCWorks compiler went OK, except for the linking stage of temacs. I checked the mailing list archives and saw that someone else had already encountered the same problem and had devised the same ugly workaround (manually fixing the Makefile). Since it's no longer an isolated incident[1], I decided to hack a patch for this. The following patch works in my environment[2], but may be incorrect in other combinations of Solaris … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Re: (image-mode.el) Symbol's function definition is void: exec-installed-p 26 years, 1 month

Jan Vroonhof

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > What do you consider fair use of autoloads and what do you consider > misuse? I don't have strong opinions either way on this. One could > argue that autoloads are only for the user, ie. for convenience in > building a .emacs and having M-x some-unloaded-function Do The Right > Thing. I think I am currently in the "only for users camp". lisp authors should be required to make the dependencies explicit as they can be expected to … [View More]

3 participants
2 comments

loadable modules 26 years, 1 month

Giacomo Boffi

i was not able to load the sample module 'sample' in XEmacs 21.2 "Calliope" [Lucid] (i586-pc-linux) of Wed Mar 3 1999 here it is a mockup of my session: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % cd ~/src/xemacs-21.2/modules/sample % make ../../lib-src/ellcc -I. -I../../src -c sample.c ELLMAKEDOC=../../lib-src/make-docfile ../../lib-src/ellcc \ --mode=init --mod-output=sample_i.c \ --mod-name=sample --mod-version=1.0.0 \ --mod-title="Sample loadable … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Fix for double font-locking reverted buffers 26 years, 1 month

Jan Vroonhof

SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes: > +;; sb 1999-03-03 -- The above comment no longer appears to be operative as > +;; the first call to normal-mode *will* restore the font-lock state and > +;; this call forces a second font-locking to occur when reverting a buffer, > +;; which is wasteful at best. Are you sure it will restore the font-lock state or is just that the normal find-file hooks us the normal mechanism to turn it on? i.e. what happens when I am editing in a … [View More]

1 participants
0 comments

Re: failed compilation of xemacs-21.2.11 26 years, 1 month

SL Baur

Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz(a)wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com> writes: ... >> But we should definitely fix the manuals so that makeinfo shuts >> up, because there will be no peace in the valley until we do. >> > Yes, fixing wasn't very difficulty. I've attached a patch which should > solve the problem. Works for me. I've applied this patch to 21.0 and 21.2, thanks.

1 participants
0 comments

Friday's betas are on schedule 26 years, 1 month

SL Baur

and should be uploaded in the afternoon JST (+0900). A Sumo[1] update will be made some time earlier. Lisp package updates currently consist of reftex-1.12 [*] Reftex.el-3.43 c-support-1.12 [*] Fix autoload lossage w3-1.13[*] Fix steve build lossage ediff & viper Updates from Michael Kifer [*] Already uploaded to the FTP area. Footnotes: [1] I have been informed that the next Sumo tournament begins on the 14th. Get your VCRs ready. :-)

1 participants
0 comments

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta March 1999