August 1998 - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

[Success] 21.0 Danish Landrace on Solaris 2.6 26 years, 3 months

Holger Schauer

Hi ! No problems so far. uname -a: SunOS streetlife.coling.uni-freiburg.de 5.6 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1 ./configure 'sparc-sun-solaris2.6' '--cflags=-O6' '--prefix=/home/schauer/misc/' '--with-dialogs=lucid' '--site-includes=/home/schauer/misc/include' '--site-libraries=/home/schauer/misc/lib' '--with-pop' '--with-site-lisp' XEmacs 21.0 "Danish Landrace" configured for `sparc-sun-solaris2.6'. Where should the build process find the source code? /home/schauer/misc/src/packages/xemacs/xemacs-21.0-b52 What installation prefix should install use? /home/schauer/misc/ What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use? `s/sol2.h' and `m/sparc.h' What compiler should XEmacs be built with? gcc -O6 Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? yes What window system should XEmacs use? x11 Where do we find X Windows header files? /usr/dt/include /usr/X11R6/include Where do we find X Windows libraries? /usr/dt/lib /usr/openwin/lib Additional header files: /home/schauer/misc/include Additional libraries: /home/schauer/misc/lib Runtime library search path: /home/schauer/misc/lib:/usr/dt/lib:/usr/openwin/lib Compiling in support for XAUTH. Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for PNG image handling. Compiling in support for X-Face message headers. Compiling in support for (builtin) GIF image handling. Compiling in support for JPEG image handling. Compiling in native sound support. Compiling in support for GNU DBM. Compiling in support for CDE. Compiling in support for ToolTalk. Compiling in EXPERIMENTAL support for Drag'n'Drop ( CDE ). Compiling in support for proper session-management. Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Motif dialog boxes. Compiling in DLL support. movemail will use "dot-locking" for locking mail spool files. Using POP for mail access Holger -- --- http://www.coling.uni-freiburg.de/~schauer --- "Was für'n Agent??? Und wieso benutzt ihr nicht einfach alle die Standardlösung Outlook Express (früher MS News)? Ist IMHO das beste und übersichtlichste Programm für PC und dazu noch kostenlos!" -- Aus "Wie starte ich einen Endlosthread ?", Teil 1239

1 participants
0 comments

Re: X-error in get_mouse_position 26 years, 3 months

Holger Schauer

>>>>"GE" == Gunnar Evermann schrieb am 16 Aug 1998 11:44:37 +0200: GE> evaluating the following results in an X Error on stderr. (Linux GE> 2.0.35, Xfree86 3.3.2, fvwm2). I don't see your problems on a Solaris 2.6 setup, with fvwm 2.0.46 running on an OpenWin 3.5 (i.e. a remote Solaris 2.5 machine). I just get (nil nil) as a result. For the record: "21.0 \"Danish Landrace\" XEmacs Lucid" Holger -- --- http://www.coling.uni-freiburg.de/~schauer --- "Was für'n Agent??? Und wieso benutzt ihr nicht einfach alle die Standardlösung Outlook Express (früher MS News)? Ist IMHO das beste und übersichtlichste Programm für PC und dazu noch kostenlos!" -- Aus "Wie starte ich einen Endlosthread ?", Teil 1239

1 participants
0 comments

20.1-b51 crash on Solaris 26 years, 3 months

Raymond Toy

FYI: Solaris 2.5.1, X11R6.3, gcc 2.7.2 I was running with sparcworks on xemacs. I moved the scrollbar on one of the source windows and got the following crash. The lisp backtrace is: scrollbar-line-up(#<window on "parake20.f" 0xc9e>) # (condition-case ... . error) # (catch top-level ...) The C backtrace is below. Ray #0 0xeeff452c in kill () #1 0x78f98 in fatal_error_signal (sig=11) at emacs.c:262 #2 <signal handler called> #3 0x12404c in add_margin_runes (dl=0x76e120, db=0x989bd0, start=19, count=1, layout=GL_OUTSIDE_MARGIN, side=2, window=540227584) at redisplay.c:2721 #4 0x124878 in create_left_glyph_block (w=0x333800, dl=0x76e120, overlay_width=10060308) at redisplay.c:3052 #5 0x11fec0 in generate_display_line (w=0x333800, dl=0x76e120, bounds=48049, start_pos=47991, start_col=2841600, prop=0xefffdd04, type=2) at redisplay.c:739 #6 0x127178 in regenerate_window (w=0x333800, start_pos=47991, point=3356680, type=2) at redisplay.c:4253 #7 0x12bdc8 in update_line_start_cache (w=0x333800, from=47912, to=48837, point=47914, no_regen=0) at redisplay.c:7024 #8 0x12afa4 in point_in_line_start_cache (w=0x333800, point=47914, min_past=1) at redisplay.c:6480 #9 0xfa65c in vmotion_1 (w=0x333800, orig=47914, vtarget=-1, ret_vpos=0xefffdfb8, ret_vpix=0x0) at indent.c:569 #10 0xfaa04 in vmotion (w=0x333800, orig=47914, vtarget=-1, ret_vpos=0xefffdfb8) at indent.c:649 #11 0x1807c8 in window_scroll (window=540227584, n=1, direction=-1, errb=ERROR_ME_NOT) at window.c:4051 #12 0x90d98 in Fscrollbar_line_up (window=540227584) at scrollbar.c:700 #13 0x8173c in funcall_recording_as (recorded_as=-1607428388, nargs=1, args=0xefffe188) at eval.c:3197 #14 0x82fa0 in call1 (fn=-1607428388, arg0=540227584) at eval.c:3238 #15 0xbd7a0 in execute_command_event (command_builder=0x470380, event=546978260) at event-stream.c:4341 #16 0xbe070 in Fdispatch_event (event=546978260) at event-stream.c:4685 #17 0x61150 in Fcommand_loop_1 () at cmdloop.c:579 #18 0x60f60 in command_loop_1 (dummy=-1607540732) at cmdloop.c:494 #19 0x7ddd8 in condition_case_1 (handlers=-1607540636, bfun=0x60f3c <command_loop_1>, barg=-1607540732, hfun=0x612dc <cmd_error>, harg=-1607540732) at eval.c:1653 #20 0x613f0 in command_loop_2 (dummy=-1607540732) at cmdloop.c:256 #21 0x7dbbc in internal_catch (tag=-1607462812, func=0x613a4 <command_loop_2>, arg=-1607540732, threw=0x0) at eval.c:1328 #22 0x60b70 in initial_command_loop (load_me=398244) at cmdloop.c:305 #23 0x7a86c in xemacs_21_0_sparc_sun_solaris2_5_1 (argc=1, argv=0xefffe884, envp=0xefffe88c, restart=0) at emacs.c:1702 #24 0x7afc4 in main (argc=0, argv=0xefffe884, envp=0xefffe88c) at emacs.c:2119

1 participants
0 comments

Re: CVS 1.10 26 years, 3 months

SL Baur

P E Jareth Hein <jareth(a)camelot.co.jp> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org: > If backing down on the optimization doesn't help, [I've got most of the system except the Linux kernel compiled with pgcc at `-O6 ...'] -mpentium -march=pentium -O2 bombs in the same place. I'm trying just plain -O now. > (taking a look at src/sanity.sh) test devcom3-7 relates to working > with setting watches on files and making sure all operations are > forward compatible (i.e. won't clobber something it doesn't quite > understand). O.K. I'm not sure I care about that.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: lexical-let (was: Re: Faster lisp engine) 26 years, 3 months

Hrvoje Niksic

Per Abrahamsen <abraham(a)dina.kvl.dk> writes: > I'm 100% for the `lexical-let' route, if it would make code (that uses > it) faster. The huge win is that we could use is _now_ to gain > performance in new Emacsen, without sacrificing portability with older > Emacsen. I think `lexical-let' actually makes the code *slower* for older Emacsen, where all the current (X)Emacsen count as "old". > I'd take speed and portability over purity any day. I don't think the lexical-let proposal wins much speed, really. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: Mr Gandhi, what do you think of Western Civilization? Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.

2 participants
1 comments

Re: Macros: Scheme vs Common Lisp 26 years, 3 months

Hrvoje Niksic

sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes: > Hrvoje> It certainly can. Try it! > > Maybe I'm doing the wrong thing. In CLISP: > > > (defmacro foo () (cons (make-symbol "bar") (make-symbol "bar"))) > FOO > > (macroexpand '(foo)) > (#:|bar| . #:|bar|) ; > > They sure look the same to me. Set *PRINT-READABLY* to t, and use an example where it actually makes a different. For instance: > (defmacro foo () (let ((a (make-symbol "foo")) (b (make-symbol "foo"))) (list a b a))) FOO > (macroexpand '(foo)) (#:|foo| #:|foo| #:|foo|) ; T > (setq *print-readably* t) T > (macroexpand '(foo)) (#1=#:|foo| #:|foo| #1#) ; T XEmacs does this by default, with `print-gensym' set to t. Your example would print: (#1=#:bar . #2=#:bar) -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Then... his face does a complete change of expression. It goes from a "Vengeance is mine" expression, to a "What the fuck" blank look.

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Where do you want to go tomorrow? 26 years, 3 months

Hrvoje Niksic

karlheg(a)inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes: > Hrvoje> I'd better base my judgement on knowledge rather than on > Hrvoje> glimpses. I'll try to buy the book Justin recommended. > > >> Tell us what you think of Scheme after that, Please. > > Hrvoje> I will. > > Cool. Do you have any trouble finding computer books where you > live? Not with finding as much as with prices. The "computer books" are usually pretty expensive hard-cover editions that cost 200-400K (divide with 6 to get a price in dollars), which is very expensive given the salaries here. Used books are cheaper, but it's hard to find a used book about programming, especially about something as exotic as Lisp or Scheme. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Thou Who might be our Father Who perhaps may be in Heaven... -- Roger Zelazny

1 participants
0 comments

Re: Faster lisp engine 26 years, 3 months

Karl M. Hegbloom

>>>>> "Olivier" == Olivier Galibert <galibert(a)pobox.com> writes: Olivier> I think that lexical scoping would make a huge difference Olivier> by allowing much tighter optimizations of the compiled Olivier> code. It occured to me yesterday that perhaps instead of changing the `let' and `let*' into lexical versions, the `lexical-let' from `cl' ought to be recoded in C, so that it won't have to do the `aref' it does now... My crystal ball is becoming cloudy. I hope this means I was on the right wavelength for a short time. Is this what is planned? ... back to reading the lists, then to my studies. :-)

4 participants
3 comments

Re: Macros: Scheme vs Common Lisp 26 years, 3 months

Michael Sperber

>>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes: Hrvoje> sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber Hrvoje> [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes: >> (Moreover, expanding the macros cannot tell two uninterned >> symbols with the same name apart, can it?) Hrvoje> It certainly can. Try it! Maybe I'm doing the wrong thing. In CLISP: > (defmacro foo () (cons (make-symbol "bar") (make-symbol "bar"))) FOO > (macroexpand '(foo)) (#:|bar| . #:|bar|) ; They sure look the same to me. -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

1 participants
0 comments

CVS 1.10 26 years, 3 months

SL Baur

I see there's a new stable CVS out. Any success/horror stories, or is this pretty much the same as 1.9.28/1.9.29?

2 participants
1 comments

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

XEmacs-Beta August 1998