wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch&gt; writes: > > > wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > > > > > GCC_VERSION=`some magic here` > > > > > > dnl Search for GCC specific build problems we know about > > > if test "$GCC" = "yes"; then > > > case `uname -s`:`uname -m`:$GCC_VERSION in > > > > If this could be made into a real patch than this is approved and > > retroactively recommended for every XEmacs known to man. > > Unfortunately, I don't have the time to hack on it right now... have to get > back to real work and housebreaking the new puppy. :) I made it into real patch. PROBLEMS file is not exactly clear about what version is OK and what version is not. Does egcs 1.0 means from egcs-1.0 to egcs-1.0.3a? Also, I don't have access to systems other than Solaris 2.6 (sparc), Debian GNU/Linux potato (i686) and RedHat Linux 5.2 (sparc), so I cannot test on other platforms. egcs test is not tested yet because I don't have egcs here. Could someone please test this patch before I send it to xemacs-patches? You need to run autoconf after applying this patch. Thanks.