nix> (That's a basic warning? I always thought it a bug in nix> desktop.el... ;} ) Stephen> Until we start writing and approving specs (PEPs, Stephen> anyone?), the existing behavior is the spec. Stephen> Anything that changes existing user-visible behavior that Stephen> is not contrary to existing documentation should be Stephen> submitted as a separate change, and flagged as an Stephen> enhancement. Probably it would be a good idea to submit Stephen> for discussion on xemacs-beta first. Stephen> This looks like a good change to me, but the problem here Why is it good to suppress warnings by default? Stephen> is that at the moment we don't have a good way to Stephen> communicate this kind of change to package users. Stephen> -- Stephen> Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp Stephen> University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Stephen> Don't ask how you can "do" free software business; Stephen> ask what your business can "do for" free software. -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/