2:47 p.m.
QUERY
Sorry to bug you again, but as long as you're interested enough to try
to get it right, I'm gonna ask:
>>>> "SY" == Steve Youngs
<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au> writes:
SY> [...]
# Experimental rule to build latin-unity-tables.el.
-latin-unity-tables.el: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc
- $(BOOT_XEMACS) -l latin-unity-utils -f latin-unity-dump-tables
- ＠echo "*** You may see a few warnings about ISO 8859/3. ***"
- ＠echo "*** This is OK; it doesn't use all code points. ***"
+#latin-unity-tables.el: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc
+# $(BOOT_XEMACS) -l latin-unity-utils -f latin-unity-dump-tables
+# ＠echo "*** You may see a few warnings about ISO 8859/3. ***"
+# ＠echo "*** This is OK; it doesn't use all code points. ***"
Is this deletion necessary? It's definitely possible that people with
= 21.5.6 would want to rebuild the table, depending on their needs
and possible changes in ISO 8859 -- I think Latin-10 is still pending,
and maybe -7 and -8. These would be reflected in the Unicode Consortium
tables, and eventually in our etc/unicode stuff.
If it's necessary, how about a rule
.PHONY: build-table
build-table: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc
$(BOOT_XEMACS) -l latin-unity-utils -f latin-unity-dump-tables
＠echo "*** You may see a few warnings about ISO 8859/3. ***"
＠echo "*** This is OK; it doesn't use all code points. ***"
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
10:03 p.m.
New subject: [Q Re: [V PACKAGES (latin-unity)] Fix build. (generate latin-unity-tables.el)
|--==> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
SJT> QUERY
SJT> Sorry to bug you again, but as long as you're interested enough to try
SJT> to get it right, I'm gonna ask:
That's cool.
>>>>>"SY" == Steve Youngs
<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au> writes:
SY> [...]
SJT> # Experimental rule to build latin-unity-tables.el.
SJT> -latin-unity-tables.el: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc
SJT> - $(BOOT_XEMACS) -l latin-unity-utils -f latin-unity-dump-tables
SJT> - ＠echo "*** You may see a few warnings about ISO 8859/3. ***"
SJT> - ＠echo "*** This is OK; it doesn't use all code points. ***"
SJT> +#latin-unity-tables.el: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc
SJT> +# $(BOOT_XEMACS) -l latin-unity-utils -f latin-unity-dump-tables
SJT> +# ＠echo "*** You may see a few warnings about ISO 8859/3. ***"
SJT> +# ＠echo "*** This is OK; it doesn't use all code points. ***"
SJT> Is this deletion necessary?
No, I just commented it out for cleanliness because it wasn't going to
be used by the XPRM. But having it in there won't hurt anything.
It's going to be needed if/when building the tables becomes a safe
thing to do for everyone, so feel free to uncomment it again.
Anyone who wanted to build their own tables could simply 'make
latin-unity-tables.el' from latin-unity's source directory.
SJT> If it's necessary, how about a rule
SJT> .PHONY: build-table
SJT> build-table: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc
[...]
This would work too, but I wouldn't do it because if/when the tables
are _always_ built this would need to be renamed to
"latin-unity-tables.el". It might get forgotten.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au>---|
5:53 p.m.
New subject: [Q Re: [V PACKAGES (latin-unity)] Fix build. (generate latin-unity-tables.el)
Steve Youngs <sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au> writes:
SJT> Is this deletion necessary?
No, I just commented it out for cleanliness because it wasn't going to
be used by the XPRM. But having it in there won't hurt anything.
It's going to be needed if/when building the tables becomes a safe
thing to do for everyone, so feel free to uncomment it again.
Anyone who wanted to build their own tables could simply 'make
latin-unity-tables.el' from latin-unity's source directory.
SJT> If it's necessary, how about a rule
SJT> .PHONY: build-table
SJT> build-table: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc
[...]
This would work too, but I wouldn't do it because if/when the tables
are _always_ built this would need to be renamed to
"latin-unity-tables.el". It might get forgotten.
Have you decided what to do with the package now? I would like to
release new packages and would prefer to see this change committed
beforehand, so I can put out the new version of the package.
Thanks,
norbert.
7:01 a.m.
New subject: [Q Re: [V PACKAGES (latin-unity)] Fix build. (generate latin-unity-tables.el)
>>>> "viteno" == Norbert Koch
<viteno(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> This would work too, but I wouldn't do it because if/when
the
> tables are _always_ built this would need to be renamed to
> "latin-unity-tables.el". It might get forgotten.
viteno> Have you decided what to do with the package now? I would
viteno> like to release new packages and would prefer to see this
viteno> change committed beforehand, so I can put out the new
viteno> version of the package.
Steve's method is fine, but I'm still working on other stuff in
latin-unity. Just put in a note that there are known bugs in
latin-unity that haven't been fixed, and the maintainer (that's me)
apologizes for the delay and welcomes inquiries about problems.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
7495
days inactive
7502
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Norbert Koch -
Stephen J. Turnbull -
Steve Youngs