SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Not that I care myself -- I use X now. But as someone who used
> XEmacs (not FSF Emacs) on terminals for some time, I know I'd be
> monstrously annoyed by such a "feature". In applications like
> Gnus and VM your frame is split most of the time, making every
> minibuffer operation imply screen repaint. In an emulator, this
> is acceptable. On a terminal... hardly.
I don't believe any one is arguing against the fact you have
identified a most undesirable feature. I'm certainly not. I can
hold back naming a 21.0 release if you really wish it,
I will not press the matter -- if others feel that the repaint is
endurable, I'll take no grudge with releasing 21.0 without fixing it.
21.0 has waited too long as is.
but if it doesn't core dump, what real difference does it make
if
the patch to fix it comes in 21.0.63 or 21.1.1?
The difference is that 21.0 will be unusable to the users on
terminals. 21.1.1 might take some time to release, no?