Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
wmperry(a)aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes:
> I would say that the file munging routines under win32 should NOT change
> the path separators.
Can you explain this request in some detail? Why should the file munging
routines leave the separators alone?
At least file-name-(non)*directory shouldn't. I would say that
file-truename or expand-file-name should be the only ones to give you full
path separator conversion.
In my view, file-name-(non)*directory are only asking you to analyze the
string, not look on the filesystem or do anything destructive to the
string. If it were expected to do file-system related stuff, I would think
it would check if directories exist, etc, etc.
*shrug* - just don't want to change that code I guess. It worked fine
up to now. :)
-Bill P.