acs> acs> Glynn wrote: acs> acs> Why was the code changed? I will cons up an entry for the News acs> file and fix the info node if we want the changes documented, but acs> it seems to me the best course of action is to restore the old acs> functionality. Does anyone else agree with me? Does anyone care? Given that specifications of the form you were trying are working for me for some faces, I assume the new behavior is a bug. I was able to reproduce your particular example not working though. greg