Cliff Liu writes:
Spell check cause segmentation fault, so does M-x report-emacs-bug
What version of XEmacs?
The backtrace is nearly useless, because it is related to a stripped
binary. Even the function names are unreliable (they're usually OK,
but sometimes a function gets optimized away completely or is declared
static, and the name of a nearby function is substituted).
I believe Red Hat supplies a debug package for XEmacs which provides
the necessary symbols to give better localization and argument values.
Please try to get that package and get a better backtrace.
Without that, we can look, but it dramatically improves chances of
finding something if we have the symbols and function arguments.
XEmacs-Beta mailing list