Fine with me, provided that it doesn't clash with APEL (as the README says it was extracted from it, among others). How is it? I added a .cvsignore and tweaked the Makefile a bit a couple of minutes ago. Some tips for the unsupported/ area: 1) Always use "unsupported" in Makefile (CATEGORY) and package-info.in (distribution) so the packages won't be mistaken as official. Also, doing that in CATEGORY allows compilation of the package in the unsupported area. Also add the package to unsupported/package-compile.el and unsupported/johndoe/Makefile. 2) Use two digits in Makefile (VERSION). I don't actually know if it's a requirement for the package system, but for consistency. -- \/ille Skyttä ville.skytta at xemacs.org

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 22:02, Simon Josefsson wrote: Ok. Let's not do a repo moves as long as disk space is not an issue, since it will confuse cvs with people's working dirs. I'll copy pgg to its new location, and you can go and cvs rm the unsupported one. Well, the only reason was that 1.00 < 1.1 < 1.11, which is not an issue since I doubt that too many people have pgg installed at the moment. I'll change it to 0.99 when moving to the official section so Rendhalver's build tools will nicely bump it to 1.00 in the first release. -- \/ille Skyttä ville.skytta at xemacs.org