Richard Stallman <rms(a)gnu.org&gt; writes: And, in addition, not to work on those that contribute only to XEmacs. That's a possibility, but I don't consider it likely. After a year and a half, I'm parsing that message just like I did at the time I received it. But you did say that you have never asked me not to work on XEmacs, which is false, as witnessed by the message above. Of course, I don't consider your doing so a "terrible crime", but I do consider it stooping *very* low -- and I know I don't want to follow you there, ever. Your further explanation why I should not work on XEmacs was also "interesting", but I think I'll spare the readership more old messages. I mailed that one because you forced me so by claiming that you've never asked me to work on XEmacs, thus insulting my recollection and intelligence. I agree in the principle; however, my conscience is clear. If you have something to say, say it. You've never had compunctions about doing that.