Rick Campbell <rick(a)campbellcentral.org> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
[ My apologies to anyone who's seeing this a second time -- I
don't
think it made it to the list when I first sent it -Rick ]
From: gfoster(a)suzieq.ml.org (Gary D. Foster)
Date: 04 Jan 1999 22:12:38 -0800
Now, after it was out for a while and everyone was (pretty much)
satisfied with it, Martin chose to make a single change... to change
the _default_ behavior and not the underlying code.
But changing the default value is the only part of the whole
situation
that strikes me as a bad thing.
Count me on the side believing the default delete direction change as
being a terrible thing. We already have a well-defined delete forward
key. It is C-d. It requires less hand motion than the function key
and has been in place forever.
Basically, the only arguments that I've seen for changing the
*default* direction of the DEL key can be made equally well for
changing the *default* for delete-pending.
It's the same and it isn't the same. The case of pending-del is
similar to vc. So long as fixing dont-fuck-me-xemacs defaults bloats
.emacs only, they have minimal impact outside of the size of .emacs.
Defaulting to pending-del loads code whether you wish the feature or
not. This is extortion. I firmly believe the user should not be
forced to load code despite the fact it will be immediately turned
off.
There is enough of a difference that I will suffer in silence and fix
the deletion bug in my .emacs. But please, please do not turn on the
terminally brain damaged pending-del by default.
Adding options for people who want emacs to behave like vi or
windoze
or anything else seems fine to me. I'd just prefer that by default it
behave like emacs.
Maybe what we need are styles like CC mode uses. It wouldn't be all
that difficult to implement and if getting sensible behavior required
(setq xemacs-interface-style 'emacs)
in .emacs I could live with that.