Steve Youngs writes:
What's the general census of opinion of this little thing, is it
something that could go into edit-utils? Are there any reasons why it
shouldn't be included?
My vote is to go ahead and add it. What's a few hundred bytes of .el;
think of how much space we devote to silly things like vanity photos
and .wav files.
IMO there are 3 reasons *not* to add code to the packages:
1) the feature provided is clearly useless
2) it doesn't work reliably
3) it works but the code is ugly (code that comes from xemacs.org
should be exemplary of good coding standards; many people learn
Elisp by following the provided examples)
Since vertical-mode doesn't meet any of these 3 criteria, I say, "why
The only question I have is whether it does the right thing at EOB.