21.0-b60 Bug in tm - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

2025

January

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

21.0-b60 Bug in tm

Re: 21.0 TTY [not a] show-stopper

Re: Feedback on pui-list-packages

Raymond Toy

Wednesday, 6 January 1999 Wed, 6 Jan '99

4:06 p.m.

(permalink)

A colleague of mine noticed that in the latest versions of tm (1.15) and vm (1.14), there's a small bug. tm-vm uses vm-sprintf, but that no longer exists in vm. Can vm-summary-sprintf be used instead? Ray

Reply

Show replies by date

Kyle Jones

Thursday, 7 January Thu, 7 Jan

8:10 a.m.

(permalink)

Raymond Toy writes:

A colleague of mine noticed that in the latest versions of tm (1.15) and vm (1.14), there's a small bug. tm-vm uses vm-sprintf, but that no longer exists in vm. Can vm-summary-sprintf be used instead?

Not without some modifications, as the parameter list for vm-summary-sprintf is different than vm-sprintf. This will probably work: (defun vm-sprintf (var msg &optional tok) (vm-summary-sprintf (symbol-value var) msg tok))

Reply

9499

days inactive

9500

days old

xemacs-beta@xemacs.org

Manage subscription

1 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Kyle Jones
Raymond Toy