Ar an naoú lá déag de mí Aibréan, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull:
Aidan Kehoe writes:
> That means usually that the DOC file the binary thinks it should use
> doesn’t correspond to its version. We should really version the DOC
> files in the same we we version the .dmp files, and avoid over-writing
I agree that sounds plausible, but somebody on emacs-devel was arguing
against versioning of DOC files any finer than the version of Emacs
(Emacs uses a build number instead of our "corrupted timestamp").
Do you have a link, or a brief summary of what that person’s argument was?
‘Liston operated so fast that he once accidentally amputated an assistant’s
fingers along with a patient’s leg, […] The patient and the assistant both
died of sepsis, and a spectator reportedly died of shock, resulting in the
only known procedure with a 300% mortality.’ (Atul Gawande, NEJM, 2012)
XEmacs-Beta mailing list