Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.ORG&gt; writes: > At 07:22 PM 4/15/00 -0700, Ben Wing wrote: > >hasn't andy already created a bunch of abstract interfaces onto widgets? > > Well, extended the glyph syntax is probably more accurate. But the syntax > is abstract and does work, even if it is very simple. I really don't like the thought of writing a complex gui as a bunch of glyph instantiators either. For things that will be going in the gutter this is doable, but writing something like the `customize' interface from sawmill would be ... not fun.