Which means I should accept the new host key! But why do the buildslaves update fail? A quick look at the logs shows a message about a real url beeing http://anonscm.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs. That message wasn't there before I think. But after that there is a "hg update ... -r real" But there is no real revision. Bug in buildbot or bad configuration? Ideas are welcome. Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Need to look into buildbot for this. The setup just specifies that we use Mercurial and that we build using GNU Autoconf. Quite convenient when it works. A nightmare when debugging ;-) I don't think I made any changes to the buildmaster during the maintenance at Alioth so my guess is that the new setup somehow triggered this odd behavior. I'll try some more debugging later today (and hope that someone comes up with the solution when I'm away ;-) Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Mats Lidell writes: While you're our best expert on buildbot at the moment, it's always a good idea to post all of the log that might be relevant. Somebody might see something that you don't. At least, that's what happens to me when I post logs.... People on debian-i18n are in pain too. One partial answer was: This is mostly likely related to the alioth migration the past weekend. A thread about changed hostnamed and lost Access Control Lists and stuff has emerged at debian-devel(a)l.d.o, no conclusion has been seen yet. I am sure this will be properly resolved soon but as it stands now it's really really messy. A good starting point for those who want to read more: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00886.html I don't know if that URL will be of any help, but given that lots of folks have trouble, I suppose it's possible that it will just fix itself. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Yes it works (and I have done it a few times before ;-) I just wanted to check since the build slaves had problems. After fixing the login the pull works fine for my private area on the same machine as the build slaves. Now it is time to fix the buildslaves.... Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: Huh - works for me. Could you try again? (Also, just to be sure, could you try pulling via ssh instead of http?) -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Have you tried a fresh clone? I just did this and it worked fine for me: hg clone ssh://sperber-guest＠hg.debian.org//hg/xemacs/xemacs test Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: It appears Debian crippled their /bin/sh and their /usr/bin/mail. (Typical ...) I've tried to work around it, but I don't know how to add the "X-XEmacs-Changeset" header with the crippled /usr/bin/mail. Help welcome! -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Vin Shelton writes: Not with the URL you used. They've changed the anonymous URLs to refer to anonscm.debian.org, but unlike hg which tells you about it (to the confusion of poor Mats and his buildbots), CVS can't tell you about it, I guess. But, oops, again: cvs -d :pserver:anonymous＠anonscm.debian.org:/xemacs status was rejected for failed authorization. cvs -d :ext:unwelcome-guest＠cvs.debian.org:/cvs/xemacs status worked for me, though. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Ar an seachtú lá is fiche de mí Bealtaine, scríobh Vin Shelton: You should be able to use your Alioth username (unwelcome-guest is Stephen’s; I have no problem using Michael Sperber’s, as we do for hg). They have, however, needlessly and stupidly changed the path to the CVS root from /cvsroot/xemacs to /cvs/xemacs, and I needed to do the following before a checked-out tree would update for me: find . -name Root | while read; do echo ':ext:sperber-guest＠cvs.debian.org:/cvs/xemacs' > $REPLY; done -- “Apart from the nine-banded armadillo, man is the only natural host of Mycobacterium leprae, although it can be grown in the footpads of mice.” -- Kumar & Clark, Clinical Medicine, summarising improbable leprosy research _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Vin Shelton wrote: They changed the addresses of the repositories. I had to re-checkout the whole repo with a new set of parameters: cvs:ext:didier-guest＠cvs.debian.org:/cvs/xemacs checkout XEmacs/packages shoud do it (s/didier/vin-or-whatever/). -- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Michael Sperber writes: On my Debian system mail is mailx, which doesn't document any way to add arbitrary headers. I don't know how much more crippled you can get than that (except for cat | sendmail, q.v. :-). sendmail < mail-with-all-user-headers xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org doesn't work? IIRC sendmail-compatible MTAs will provide Date and Message-ID fields if you don't, as they are required by RFC 5322 (and all predecessors). So you need From, To, Subject, X-XEmacs-Changeset, and a blank line. Anything else? _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta